Research Article
An Efficient Evolutionary Task Scheduling/Binding Framework for Reconfigurable Systems
Table 3
Schedulers comparison for total execution time (after learning phase).
| Benchmark | Total execution time | Percentage | | | | | |
| S1 | 500 | 660 | 520 | −24 | −4 | S2 | 1140 | 1690 | 1160 | −33 | −2 | S3 | 280 | 390 | 280 | −28 | 0 | S4 | 755 | 1370 | 660 | −45 | 14 | S6 | 140 | 140 | 120 | 0 | 17 | S7 | 400 | 700 | 430 | −43 | −7 | S8 | 360 | 440 | 345 | −18 | 4 | S9 | 975 | 1950 | 950 | −50 | 3 | S10 | 1075 | 2620 | 1075 | −59 | 0 | S11 | 900 | 1230 | 866 | −27 | 4 | DFG2 | 660 | 830 | 584 | −20 | 13 | DFG6 | 305 | 360 | 322 | −15 | −5 | DFG7 | 385 | 555 | 436 | −31 | −12 | DFG12 | 725 | 870 | 723 | −17 | 0 | DFG14 | 120 | 160 | 103 | −25 | 17 | DFG16 | 275 | 380 | 288 | −28 | −5 | DFG19 | 435 | 540 | 460 | −19 | −5 |
| Average | 555 | 876 | 548 | −28 | 2 |
|
|