Research Article
An Efficient Evolutionary Task Scheduling/Binding Framework for Reconfigurable Systems
Table 5
Comparison of schedulers based on number of reused tasks (before learning).
| Benchmark |
Number HW task reuse | Percentage | | | | | |
| S1 | 38 | 22 | 37 | −42 | −3 | S2 | 139 | 74 | 128 | −47 | −8 | S3 | 17 | 6 | 10 | −65 | −41 | S4 | 74 | 28 | 67 | −62 | −9 | S6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | −20 | −20 | S7 | 36 | 8 | 27 | −78 | −25 | S8 | 18 | 9 | 14 | −50 | −22 | S9 | 128 | 53 | 118 | −59 | −8 | S10 | 181 | 54 | 173 | −70 | −4 | S11 | 88 | 40 | 78 | −55 | −11 | DFG2 | 37 | 23 | 38 | −38 | 3 | DFG6 | 21 | 19 | 19 | −10 | −10 | DFG7 | 49 | 36 | 42 | −27 | −14 | DFG12 | 86 | 72 | 84 | −16 | −2 | DFG14 | 7 | 4 | 5 | −43 | −29 | DFG16 | 32 | 26 | 26 | −19 | −19 | DFG19 | 50 | 42 | 49 | −16 | −2 |
| Average | 59 | 31 | 54 | −42 | −13 |
|
|