Research Article
An Efficient Evolutionary Task Scheduling/Binding Framework for Reconfigurable Systems
Table 6
Comparison of schedulers based on number of reused tasks (after learning).
| Benchmark |
Number or task reuse | Percentage | | | | | |
| S1 | 38 | 26 | 41 | −32 | 8 | S2 | 139 | 79 | 131 | −43 | −6 | S3 | 17 | 10 | 13 | −41 | −24 | S4 | 74 | 33 | 79 | −55 | 7 | S6 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 60 | 60 | S7 | 36 | 17 | 31 | −53 | −14 | S8 | 18 | 13 | 21 | −28 | 17 | S9 | 128 | 56 | 123 | −56 | −4 | S10 | 181 | 74 | 183 | −59 | 1 | S11 | 88 | 51 | 90 | −42 | 2 | DFG2 | 37 | 24 | 38 | −35 | 3 | DFG6 | 21 | 20 | 22 | −5 | 5 | DFG7 | 49 | 38 | 48 | −22 | −2 | DFG12 | 86 | 73 | 85 | −15 | −1 | DFG14 | 7 | 5 | 8 | −29 | 14 | DFG16 | 32 | 27 | 32 | −16 | 0 | DFG19 | 50 | 42 | 49 | −16 | −2 |
| Average | 59 | 35 | 59 | −29 | 4 |
|
|