Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Rotating Machinery
Volume 2012, Article ID 543096, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/543096
Research Article

Predicting Unsteady Loads in Marine Propulsor Crashback Using Large Eddy Simulation

Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Received 15 January 2012; Accepted 17 May 2012

Academic Editor: Jules W. Lindau

Copyright © 2012 Hyunchul Jang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Moin and K. Mahesh, “Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 30, pp. 539–578, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Mahesh, G. Constantinescu, and P. Moin, “A numerical method for large-eddy simulation in complex geometries,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 215–240, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Chang, M. Ebert, Y. L. Young et al., “Propeller forces and structural responses to crashback,” in Proceedings of the 27th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
  4. S. Jessup, C. Chesnakas, D. Fry, M. Donnelly, S. Black, and J. Park, “Propeller performance at extreme off design conditions,” in Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, St. John’s, Canada, 2004.
  5. D. H. Bridges, M. J. Donnelly, and J. T. Park, “Experimental investigation of the submarine crashback maneuver,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 130, no. 1, Article ID 011103, 11 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Hecker and K. Remmers, “Four quadrant open-water performance of propellers 3710, 4024, 4086, 4381, 4382, 4383, 4384 and 4426,” Report NSRADC 417-H01, David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. W. Jiang, R. R. Dong, H. L. Lui, and M. S. Chang, “24-inch water tunnel flow field measurements during propeller crashback,” in Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, vol. 136, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  8. S. Jessup, D. Fry, and M. Donnelly, “Unsteady propeller performance in crashback conditions with and without duct,” in Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, 2006.
  9. M. Donnelly, S. Jessup, and A. Etebari, “Measurement of steady and unsteady duct Loads for propeller 4381 at crashback conditions in the 36 in. water tunnel,” Hydromechanics Department Report NSWCCD-50-TR-2008, Naval Surface Warfare Center, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  10. F. Davoudzadeh, L. K. Taylor, W. C. Zierke, J. J. Dreyer, H. McDonald, and D. L. Whitfield, “Coupled Navier-Stokes and equations of motion simulation of submarine maneuvers, including crashback,” in Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting (FED '97), vol. 2, June 1997. View at Scopus
  11. B. Chen and F. Stern, “Computational fluid dynamics of four-quadrant marine-propulsor flow,” Journal of Ship Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 218–228, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Vyšsohld and K. Mahesh, “Large eddy simulation of crashback in marine propellers,” in Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, 2006.
  13. H. Jang and K. Mahesh, “Large eddy simulation of ducted propulsors in crashback,” in Proceedings of the 27th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
  14. H. Jang and K. Mahesh, “Large eddy simulation of marine propellers in crashback,” in Proceedings of the 28 thSymposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena, Calif, USA, 2010.
  15. A. Verma, H. Jang, and K. Mahesh, “Large eddy simulation of the effect of hull on marine propulsors in crashback,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany, 2011.
  16. M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. H. Cabot, “A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model,” Physics of Fluids A, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1760–1765, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. K. Lilly, “A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method,” Physics of Fluids A, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 633–635, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. MacPherson, J. R. W. Rodgers, C. B. Alien, and C. L. Fenwick, “Sliding and non-matching grid methods for helicopter simulations,” in Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2006, pp. 12857–12869, January 2006, AIAA Paper No. 2006-1070. View at Scopus
  19. R. Steijl and G. Barakos, “Sliding mesh algorithm for CFD analysis of helicopter rotor-fuselage aerodynamics,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 527–549, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Pan, M. J. Chao, and S. K. Chien, “Euler computations of rotor flows on unstructured rotating meshes,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 672–679, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. L. Blades and D. L. Marcum, “A sliding interface method for unsteady unstructured flow simulations,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 507–529, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Donea, A. Huerta, J. P. Ponthot, and A. Rodriguez-Ferran, “Arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian methods,” in The Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, vol. 1, chapter 14, John Wiley & Sons, 2004. View at Google Scholar