Effect of Chamfer Angle on the Calibration Curves of Five Hole Probes

<table>Calibration curves: <svg height="12.4448pt" id="M76" style="vertical-align:-3.446851pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.99795 45.2634 12.4448" width="45.2634pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M645 631C614 643 545 666 457 666C215 666 23 519 23 283C23 90 158 -16 337 -16C412 -16 489 2 522 10C543 39 590 127 606 167L580 181C519 89 459 18 348 18C201 18 122 136 122 287C122 464 244 632 435 632C544 632 602 595 608 472L639 475C643 526 645 581 645 631Z" id="g113-68"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="668" vert-adv-y="668"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,8.982,3.264)"><path d="M622 479C622 589 545 650 400 650H146L140 618C229 609 230 602 215 527L135 132C117 43 112 41 27 32L18 0H305L313 32C213 40 205 44 222 132L251 284L324 262H365C484 269 622 333 622 479ZM528 477C528 356 420 305 344 305C300 305 276 314 259 321L303 554C311 597 313 600 331 606C345 611 361 614 379 614C463 614 528 580 528 477Z" id="g50-81"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="640" vert-adv-y="640"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,14.885,3.264)"><path d="M592 498C586 556 582 629 581 675H560C545 656 537 650 510 650H115C87 650 74 652 60 675H40C38 620 33 555 28 495H57C69 539 77 568 89 585C102 607 122 616 205 616H267V123C267 44 259 34 168 28V0H454V28C360 34 352 44 352 123V616H422C498 616 514 608 531 584C542 568 552 543 562 495L592 498Z" id="g190-85"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="617" vert-adv-y="617"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,20.66,3.264)"><path d="M381 665C170 665 44 498 44 318C44 125 188 -15 369 -15C552 -15 703 117 703 333C703 534 550 665 381 665ZM359 629C491 629 601 517 601 306C601 114 502 21 390 21C249 21 146 158 146 346S248 629 359 629Z" id="g190-80"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="747" vert-adv-y="747"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,27.688,3.264)"><path d="M592 498C586 556 582 629 581 675H560C545 656 537 650 510 650H115C87 650 74 652 60 675H40C38 620 33 555 28 495H57C69 539 77 568 89 585C102 607 122 616 205 616H267V123C267 44 259 34 168 28V0H454V28C360 34 352 44 352 123V616H422C498 616 514 608 531 584C542 568 552 543 562 495L592 498Z" id="g190-85"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="617" vert-adv-y="617"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,32.844,3.264)"><path d="M673 0V28C608 34 594 43 563 129C499 303 432 494 370 665L339 656L132 132C98 43 84 37 20 28V0H238V28C162 35 154 45 175 108C188 150 203 192 219 237H432C454 176 474 122 487 83S491 36 428 28V0H673ZM418 280H234C265 362 296 450 328 535H330L418 280Z" id="g190-66"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="691" vert-adv-y="691"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,39.397,3.264)"><path d="M495 163C480 117 462 85 444 65C421 39 387 34 332 34C290 34 256 36 236 47C218 57 213 77 213 131V526C213 612 222 616 301 622V650H40V622C122 616 128 611 128 526V126C128 41 120 34 36 28V0H489C498 31 519 126 525 157L495 163Z" id="g190-77"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="538" vert-adv-y="538"></glyph.data></g></svg> versus <i>β</i>.</table>

International Journal of Rotating Machinery

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: Effect of Chamfer Angle on the Calibration Curves of Five Hole Probes 