Effect of Chamfer Angle on the Calibration Curves of Five Hole Probes

<table>Calibration curves: <svg height="12.4448pt" id="M85" style="vertical-align:-3.446851pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.99795 46.4152 12.4448" width="46.4152pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M645 631C614 643 545 666 457 666C215 666 23 519 23 283C23 90 158 -16 337 -16C412 -16 489 2 522 10C543 39 590 127 606 167L580 181C519 89 459 18 348 18C201 18 122 136 122 287C122 464 244 632 435 632C544 632 602 595 608 472L639 475C643 526 645 581 645 631Z" id="g113-68"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="668" vert-adv-y="668"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,8.982,3.264)"><path d="M622 479C622 589 545 650 400 650H146L140 618C229 609 230 602 215 527L135 132C117 43 112 41 27 32L18 0H305L313 32C213 40 205 44 222 132L251 284L324 262H365C484 269 622 333 622 479ZM528 477C528 356 420 305 344 305C300 305 276 314 259 321L303 554C311 597 313 600 331 606C345 611 361 614 379 614C463 614 528 580 528 477Z" id="g50-81"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="640" vert-adv-y="640"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,14.885,3.264)"><path d="M409 504C401 567 396 607 392 642C354 654 312 665 266 665C137 665 60 583 60 487C60 374 161 325 225 290C300 250 355 215 355 141C355 68 311 21 235 21C131 21 86 122 71 183L41 176C48 128 61 42 68 21C78 16 93 8 118 0C142 -7 175 -15 216 -15C349 -15 438 69 438 174C438 287 344 333 265 374C186 414 138 449 138 522C138 576 172 631 249 631C336 631 363 562 380 499L409 504Z" id="g190-84"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="474" vert-adv-y="474"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,19.285,3.264)"><path d="M592 498C586 556 582 629 581 675H560C545 656 537 650 510 650H115C87 650 74 652 60 675H40C38 620 33 555 28 495H57C69 539 77 568 89 585C102 607 122 616 205 616H267V123C267 44 259 34 168 28V0H454V28C360 34 352 44 352 123V616H422C498 616 514 608 531 584C542 568 552 543 562 495L592 498Z" id="g190-85"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="617" vert-adv-y="617"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,24.442,3.264)"><path d="M673 0V28C608 34 594 43 563 129C499 303 432 494 370 665L339 656L132 132C98 43 84 37 20 28V0H238V28C162 35 154 45 175 108C188 150 203 192 219 237H432C454 176 474 122 487 83S491 36 428 28V0H673ZM418 280H234C265 362 296 450 328 535H330L418 280Z" id="g190-66"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="691" vert-adv-y="691"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,30.366,3.264)"><path d="M592 498C586 556 582 629 581 675H560C545 656 537 650 510 650H115C87 650 74 652 60 675H40C38 620 33 555 28 495H57C69 539 77 568 89 585C102 607 122 616 205 616H267V123C267 44 259 34 168 28V0H454V28C360 34 352 44 352 123V616H422C498 616 514 608 531 584C542 568 552 543 562 495L592 498Z" id="g190-85"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="617" vert-adv-y="617"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,36.218,3.264)"><path d="M303 0V28C221 34 213 39 213 125V525C213 610 221 616 303 622V650H38V622C120 616 128 610 128 525V125C128 40 120 34 38 28V0H303Z" id="g190-74"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="341" vert-adv-y="341"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,39.338,3.264)"><path d="M614 175C564 76 510 21 408 21C256 21 146 149 146 336C146 488 235 629 402 629C510 629 570 586 597 480L626 488C620 541 614 582 606 638C578 643 510 665 429 665C206 665 44 527 44 316C44 157 153 -15 402 -15C474 -15 558 5 586 11C604 45 629 119 643 165L614 175Z" id="g190-68"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="665" vert-adv-y="665"></glyph.data></g></svg> versus <i>β</i>.</table>

International Journal of Rotating Machinery

fig9

Figure 9

Figure 9: Effect of Chamfer Angle on the Calibration Curves of Five Hole Probes 