Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 242174, 3 pages
Research Article

The Australian Community Does Not Support Gender Selection by IVF for Social Reasons

1Monash IVF, Epworth Hospital, Bridge Rood, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia
2Roy Morgan Research, 401 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

Received 10 September 2013; Accepted 26 November 2013

Academic Editor: Samir Hamamah

Copyright © 2013 Kovacs Gab et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. K. Griffin, L. J. Wilton, A. H. Handyside, G. H. G. Atkinson, R. M. L. Winston, and J. D. A. Delhanty, “Diagnosis of sex in preimplantation embryos by fluorescent in situ hybridisation,” British Medical Journal, vol. 306, no. 6889, p. 1382, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Assisted Reproduction Treatment Act (Victoria), 1988,
  3. National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research 2004 (as revised in 2007 to take into account the changes in legislation), Section 11, June 2007; Sex selection.
  4. J. Macfarlane, “Select your baby's sex for £14,000: how British couples are being sent to Cyprus for illegal fertility treatments,” Mail on Sunday 13th February 2011,
  5. R. Kippen, A. Evans, and E. Gray, “Australian attitudes toward sex-selection technology,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 1824–1826, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus