Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5817823, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5817823
Clinical Study

Pregnancy Predictors after Intrauterine Insemination in Cases of Unexplained Infertility: A Prospective Study

Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Received 27 April 2016; Accepted 11 August 2016

Academic Editor: Stefania A. Nottola

Copyright © 2016 Ishita Ganguly et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Bagis, B. Haydardedeoglu, E. B. Kilicdag, T. Cok, E. Simsek, and A. H. Parlakgumus, “Single versus double intrauterine insemination in multi-follicular ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a randomized trial,” Human Reproduction, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1684–1690, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Nuojua-Huttunen, C. Tomas, R. Bloigu, L. Tuomivaara, and H. Martikainen, “Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome,” Human Reproduction, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 698–703, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. S. Guzick, S. A. Carson, C. Coutifaris et al., “Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 3, pp. 177–183, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Effectiveness and treatment of unexplained infertility,” Fertility Sterility, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. S111–S114, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  5. Z. Pandian, A. Gibreel, and S. Bhattacharya, “In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD003357, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Aboulghar, R. Mansour, G. Serour, A. Abdrazek, Y. Amin, and C. Rhodes, “Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of unexplained infertility should be limited to a maximum of three trials,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 88–91, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. P. Polyzos, S. Tzioras, D. Mauri, and A. Tatsioni, “Double versus single intrauterine insemination for unexplained infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized trials,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1261–1266, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. M. Isa, B. Abu-Rafea, S. A. Alasiri et al., “Accurate diagnosis as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination treatment of infertile Saudi patients,” Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 184–189, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Ashrafi, M. Rashidi, A. Ghasemi et al., “The role of infertility etiology in success rate of intrauterine insemination cycles: an evaluation of predictive factors for pregnancy rate,” International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 100–107, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Montanaro Gauci, T. F. Kruger, K. Coetzee, K. Smith, J. P. Van Der Merwe, and C. J. Lombard, “Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme,” Andrologia, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 135–141, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. R. Hansen, A. L. He, A. K. Styer et al., “Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1575–1583, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. S. Kamath, P. T. K. Bhave, T. K. Aleyamma et al., “Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination: a prospective study of factors affecting outcome,” Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 129–134, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. J. Tomlinson, J. B. Amissah-Arthur, K. A. Thompson, J. L. Kasraie, and B. Bentick, “Infertility: prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1892–1896, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. R. R. Zainul, F. B. Ong, M. H. Omar et al., “Predictors of intrauterine insemination success,” Medical Journal of Malaysia, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 599–607, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Y. Tay, V. R. Raj, A. Kulenthran, and O. Sitizawiah, “Prognostic factors influencing pregnancy rate after stimulated intrauterine insemination,” Medical Journal of Malaysia, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 286–289, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  16. G. Ibérico, J. Vioque, N. Ariza et al., “Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1308–1313, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. P. Dickey, S. N. Taylor, P. Y. Lu, B. M. Sartor, P. H. Rye, and R. Pyrzak, “Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1088–1095, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. X. Wang, G. W. Warnes, M. J. Davies, and R. J. Norman, “Overweight infertile patients have a higher fecundity than normal-weight women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1710–1712, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. C. Dodson and A. F. Haney, “Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 457–467, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. M. Kolibianakis, K. A. Zikopoulos, H. M. Fatemi et al., “Endometrial thickness cannot predict ongoing pregnancy achievement in cycles stimulated with clomiphene citrate for intrauterine insemination,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 115–118, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Yaman, T. Ebner, K. Jesacher, M. Sommergruber, G. Radner, and G. Tews, “Sonographic measurement of endometrium thickness as a predictive value for pregnancy through IVF,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 256–259, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Merviel, M. H. Heraud, N. Grenier, E. Lourdel, P. Sanguinet, and H. Copin, “Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Esmailzadeh and M. Faramarzi, “Endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 432–437, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Kovacs, S. Z. Matyas, K. Boda, and S. G. Kaali, “The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome,” Human Reproduction, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2337–2341, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Noyes, H.-C. Liu, K. Sultan, G. Schattman, and Z. Rosenwaks, “Endometrial thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization,” Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 919–922, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. A. Land, D. A. Courtar, and J. L. H. Evers, “Patient dropout in an assisted reproductive technology program: implications for pregnancy rates,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 278–281, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. Leushuis, J. W. van der Steeg, P. Steures et al., “Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 537–552, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus