Clinical Study

Higher Volume at Time of Breast Conserving Surgery Reduces Re-Excision in DCIS

Table 1

(a) Comparison of patients who underwent BCS, BCS-AM, and TM procedures.

BCSBCS-AMTM
No. of patients20115153

Age (mean)585954
Age (median)585854
DCIS grade
 Grade I17105
 Grade II885315
 Grade III968833
DCIS size
 <1 cm67449
 1-2 cm37226
 2–5 cm27199
 >5 cm912
 N/A616527
Necrosis
 Yes12410640
 No774513
Calcifications
 Yes14710937
 No534216
Multifocality
 Yes11210134
 No895019
ER
 71–100%1128319
 41–70%8103
 11–40%520
 0–10%292623
 N/A47308
PR
 71–100%22158
 41–70%15135
 11–40%24164
 0–10%937628
 N/A47318
ER/PR
 Both 71–10029198
 Both <10192519
Margin**
 Positive, <1 mm11761*1
 1-2 mm239*0
 3–5 mm17170
 6–9 mm640
 ≥10 mm3760*52
Re-excision12961***2
Residual DCIS6533*0

BCS: breast conserving surgery; BCS-AM: BCS plus additional margin; TM: total mastectomy. , total <.0001, .
(b) Indications for surgery and re-excision, categorized by surgeon.

Surgeon ASurgeon BSurgeon CSurgeon DTotal%

Indication for surgery
 Palpable mass51045246.8
 Nonpalpable mass14000144.0
 Calcifications5596596727778.7
 Mammographic lesion5315597019756.0
 Sonographic lesion8060144.0
 MRI lesion61171257.1

Surgical procedure
 Needle localization6085406725271.6
 Surgery bracket10240164.5

Indication for re-excision
 DCIS at margin61811134831.4
 Clearance <1 mm222813167951.6
 Clearance <2 mm94421912.4
 Clearance <3 mm511074.6