Review Article
Intersphincteric Resection and Coloanal Anastomosis in Treatment of Distal Rectal Cancer
Table 3
Functional results of ISR.
| Reference | Year | | Anal manometry | Functional tool | Bowel movements per 24 hours | Complete incontinence (%) | Incontinence to flatus (%) | Faecal soiling (%) | Urgency (%) |
| Braun et al. [15] | 1992 | 63 | No | Mayo clinic classification | 2.2 (1–3) | 75 | 17 | 15 | 22 | Köhler et al. [17] | 2000 | 31 | Yes | General questionnaire | 3.3 (NR) | 30 | 11 | 63 | NR | Kim et al. [18] | 2001 | 48 | No | Kirwan classification | 4.4 (3–6) | NR | NR | NR | NR | Tiret et al. [19] | 2003 | 25 | No | NR | 2.5 (NR) | 50 | 23 | 27 | 19 | Schiessel et al. [22] | 2005 | 121 | Yes | Williams and johnston classification | 2.2 (1–9) | 86.3 | NR | 13.7 | NR | Yoo et al. [45] | 2005 | 17 | No | Cleveland clinic incontinence score | 5.0 (2–9) | NR | 17.6 | 41.2 | 58.8 | Saito et al. [24] | 2006 | 228 | No | Jorge and wexner incontinence score and kirwan score | NR | 32.7 | 29.1 | 29.1 | NR | Chamlou et al. [25] | 2007 | 90 | No | Jorge and wexner incontinence score | 2.3 (NR) | 41 | 25 | 59 | 19 | Yamada et al. [33] | 2009 | 107 | No | Jorge and wexner incontinence score and Kirwan score | 3.7 (2–6) | 42.3 | NR | 27.9 | NR | Han et al. [29] | 2009 | 40 | No | Kirwan classification | 2.7 (NR) | 43 | 29 | 29 | 31 | Krand et al. [30] | 2009 | 47 | No | Kirwan classification | 2.3 (2–5) | 80 | 9 | 11 | 2 | Kuo et al. [46] | 2011 | 22 | No | Wexner incontinence score | 4.7 (NR) | NR | NR | NR | 19 |
|
|