Review Article

Oral Submucous Fibrosis in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Protocol for Management

Table 2

Characteristics of studies excluded from the systematic review.

S. No.Author and YearReason for exclusion

1.Yang et al. (2018) [27]Complete data isn’t available in the manuscript.

2.Chitguppi et al. (2017) [28]Number of cases in the decade not specified separately.

3.Khandelwal et al. (2016) [29]Patient was above 10 years.

4.Singhvi et al. (2016) [30]Number of cases in the decade not specified separately.

5.Prasad et al. (2014) [31]Pediatric OSMF cases are not mentioned separately in the study.

6.Deshpande et al. (2013) [32]Patient was above 10 years.

7.Gupta et al. (2013) [33]Patient was above 10 years.

8.Khandelwal et al. (2012) [34]No cases of pediatric OSMF are discussed in the study.

9.Ahmad MS et al. (2006) [35]All the patients were above 10 years.

10.Eric Oakley et al. (2005) [36]High school students were examined who were above 10 years.

11.Rajendran R (2004) [37]Doesn’t include cases of pediatric OSMF.

12.Shah et al. (2002) [38]Characteristics of areca nut chewing in primary school children have been mentioned but not the prevalence of OSMF.

13.Yusuf et al. (2002) [39]Patient was above 10 years of age.

14.Farrand et al. (2001) [40]Consists of details on areca nut chewing habit in children but not about OSMF caused by it.

15.Ranganathan et al. (2000) [41]Just one case of OSMF in HIV patients is mentioned but age not specified.

16.Shah et al. (2001) [42]Patient was above 10 years of age.

17.Lu et al. (1993) [43]Discusses areca nut habit in children but not OSMF.

18.Anil S et al. (1993) [44]Patient was above 10 years of age.