Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
Volume 2016, Article ID 7603507, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7603507
Research Article

Software-Assisted Depth Analysis of Optic Nerve Stereoscopic Images in Telemedicine

The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA

Received 22 November 2015; Accepted 15 March 2016

Academic Editor: Malcolm Clarke

Copyright © 2016 Tian Xia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Quigley and A. T. Broman, “The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. A. Cioffi and J. M. Liebmann, “Translating the OHTS results into clinical practice,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 375–377, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. V. Lehmann, C. Y. Mardin, P. Martus, and A. Bergua, “3D vs 2D qualitative and semiquantitative evaluation of the glaucomatous optic disc atrophy using computer-assisted stereophotography,” Eye, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 628–635, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Harper, N. Radi, B. C. Reeves, C. Fenerty, A. F. Spencer, and M. Batterbury, “Agreement between ophthalmologists and optometrists in optic disc assessment: training implications for glaucoma co-management,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 239, no. 5, pp. 342–350, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. S. Khouri, B. C. Szirth, K. S. Shahid, and R. D. Fechtner, “Software-assisted optic nerve assessment for glaucoma tele-screening,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 261–265, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Resnikoff, W. Felch, T.-M. Gauthier, and B. Spivey, “The number of ophthalmologists in practice and training worldwide: a growing gap despite more than 200 000 practitioners,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 783–787, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. M. Kolomeyer, B. C. Szirth, K. S. Shahid, G. Pelaez, N. V. Nayak, and A. S. Khouri, “Software-assisted analysis during ocular health screening,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 2–6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Shahid, A. M. Kolomeyer, N. V. Nayak et al., “Ocular telehealth screenings in an urban community,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 95–100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Azuara-Blanco, L. J. Katz, G. L. Spaeth, S. A. Vernon, F. Spencer, and I. M. Lanzl, “Clinical agreement among glaucoma experts in the detection of glaucomatous changes of the optic disk using simultaneous stereoscopic photographs,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 949–950, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Breusegem, S. Fieuws, I. Stalmans, and T. Zeyen, “Agreement and accuracy of non-expert ophthalmologists in assessing glaucomatous changes in serial stereo optic disc photographs,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 742–746, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. S. Abrams, I. U. Scott, G. L. Spaeth, H. A. Quigley, and R. Varma, “Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 1662–1667, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Bergua, C. Y. Mardin, and F. K. Horn, “Tele-transmission of stereoscopic images of the optic nerve head in glaucoma via internet,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 439–444, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. M. Vessani, R. Moritz, L. Batis, R. B. Zagui, S. Bernardoni, and R. Susanna, “Comparison of quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment by general ophthalmologists to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 253–261, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. E. Morgan, N. J. L. Sheen, R. V. North, Y. Choong, and E. Ansari, “Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 879–884, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Parkin, G. Shuttleworth, M. Costen, and C. Davison, “A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 1347–1351, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Nakagawa, T. Suzuki, Y. Hayashi et al., “Quantitative depth analysis of optic nerve head using stereo retinal fundus image pair,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 13, no. 6, Article ID 064026, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Nakagawa, Y. Hayashi, Y. Hatanaka et al., “Three-dimensional reconstruction of optic nerve head from stereo fundus images and its quantitative estimation,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS '07), pp. 6747–6750, Lyon, France, August 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Andersson, A. Heijl, and B. Bengtsson, “Optic disc classification by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and by physicians with varying experience of glaucoma,” Eye, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1401–1407, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Wollstein, D. F. Garway-Heath, L. Fontana, and R. A. Hitchings, “Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy,” Ophthalmology, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 2272–2277, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Muramatsu, T. Nakagawa, A. Sawada, Y. Hatanaka, T. Yamamoto, and H. Fujita, “Automated determination of cup-to-disc ratio for classification of glaucomatous and normal eyes on stereo retinal fundus images,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 16, no. 9, Article ID 096009, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. D. Abràmoff, W. L. M. Alward, E. C. Greenlee et al., “Automated segmentation of the optic disc from stereo color photographs using physiologically plausible features,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1665–1673, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Xu, H. Ishikawa, G. Wollstein et al., “Automated assessment of the optic nerve head on stereo disc photographs,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 2512–2517, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. K. Mesiwala, M. Pekmezci, T. C. Porco, and S. C. Lin, “Optic disc parameters from optovue optical coherence tomography: comparison of manual versus automated disc rim determination,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 367–371, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Januschowski, G. Blumenstock, C. E. Rayford II, K.-U. Bartz-Schmidt, U. Schiefer, and F. Ziemssen, “Stereometric parameters of the optic disc. Comparison between a simultaneous non-mydriatic stereoscopic fundus camera (KOWA WX 3D) and the Heidelberg scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRT IIII),” Ophthalmologe, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 957–962, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Patel, B. Szirth, A. Kolomeyer, and A. Khouri, “Software assisted depth analysis of normal optic nerve simultaneous non-mydriatic stereoscopic images,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, p. 642, 2012. View at Google Scholar