Research Article
Physicians’ Perspective of Telemedicine Regulating Guidelines and Ethical Aspects: A Saudi Experience
Table 2
Comparison points between benchmark articles and the current study.
| | Comparison points | Benchmark#1 (Albarrak et al. 2019) | Benchmark#2 (Alanzi et al. [26]) | Benchmark#3 (Kaliyadan et al. [6]) | Benchmark#4 (Nittari et al. [19]) | Benchmark#5 (Atiyeh et al. 2020) | Current study |
| 1 | Physicians’ familiarity with telemedicine guidelines/laws | | | | | | | 2 | Encountering legal issues while using telemedicine modalities in patient care | | | | | | | 3 | Maintaining professional boundaries while interacting with patients on social media | | | | | | | 4 | Reporting or correcting colleagues posting incorrect online health-related information | | | | | | | 5 | Awareness of online self-promotion regulations | | | | | | | 6 | Willingness to pay a social media influencer for advertisement | | | | | | | Total score | | 16.67% | 16.67% | 16.67% | 33.33% | 50% | 100% | Finding difference | | 83.33% | 83.33% | 83.33% | 66.67% | 50% | — |
|
|