International Journal of Tissue Engineering

International Journal of Tissue Engineering / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 754245 |

Maryam A. Shafiq, Behrad Y. Milani, Ali R. Djalilian, "In Vivo Evaluation of a Decellularized Limbal Graft for Limbal Reconstruction", International Journal of Tissue Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 754245, 6 pages, 2014.

In Vivo Evaluation of a Decellularized Limbal Graft for Limbal Reconstruction

Academic Editor: Raymund E. Horch
Received30 Jun 2013
Revised15 Oct 2013
Accepted07 Jan 2014
Published12 Feb 2014


Corneal and limbal epithelial function is highly dependent on its underlying matrix. In this study, we report the in vitro and in vivo effects of a decellularized limbal matrix on corneal and limbal epithelial differentiation and repair. We demonstrate that a limbal matrix helps to maintain epithelial cells in a more proliferative and less differentiated state. We introduce a novel focal injury model to the limbus using an excimer laser and further show that transplanting a decellularized limbal graft after the limbal injury helps to promote epithelialization and reduce corneal haze formation. These results suggest that a decellularized limbal graft may be therapeutically beneficial in clinical cases of focal limbal deficiency.

1. Introduction

The corneal epithelium forms a barrier that is critical to the integrity and clarity of the cornea. The absence of the epithelium or a compromise in its function renders the cornea susceptible to infections, secondary loss of optical clarity, and ultimately loss of vision. The corneal epithelium is maintained by a reservoir of stem and progenitor cells that are located in the limbal region—the junction between the cornea and the sclera [14]. Damage to the limbus can lead to the loss of the stem cells which in turn leads to conjunctival epithelial growth over the cornea—a condition known as limbal stem cell deficiency [5, 6].

A number of tissue engineering approaches for the reconstruction of the corneal and limbal epithelium have been investigated [712]. In most clinical applications, limbal epithelial cells are expanded in vitro and then transplanted to the diseased corneal surface [13, 14]. Various substrates for culturing corneal epithelial cells have been reported [1517]. Currently human amniotic membrane is the most common substrate and carrier for ex vivo cultured human corneal epithelial cells [18, 19]. Previously, we reported the use of a decellularized cornea as a matrix for expanding corneal cells in vitro [20]. We demonstrated that decellularized human corneas provide a scaffold that can support the growth of corneal epithelial cells and stromal fibroblasts.

In this study, we extend our previous experiments by first showing that cells grown over a decellularized limbal matrix maintain a more limbal phenotype when compared to cells cultured over the central cornea. Next, we use a novel laser based limbal injury model to show that decellularized limbal grafts promote epithelial cell regrowth in vivo and reduce corneal scarring and neovascularization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Human corneal epithelial cultures were initiated from fresh cadaver corneas kindly provided by the Illinois Eye Bank [21]. Briefly, the corneas were rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then incubated in 2 mg/mL of Dispase II (Invitrogen) in PBS for 1 h at 37°C. The epithelial sheets were peeled off and digested in 0.25% trypsin-EDTA at 37°C for 30 min. Cells were washed and then resuspended in keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM; Invitrogen), DMEM plus Ham’s F12, and fibroblast conditioned media in a ratio of 1 : 1 : 1. The cells were then plated on the basement membrane side of the decellularized cornea at a density of  cells/cornea.

2.2. Fibroblast Conditioned Media (CM)

After isolating epithelial cells (as described above), the remaining stroma was cut into  mm pieces and incubated in 0.1% collagenase (Sigma) in DMEM at 37°C for 1.5 h on a shaker. The isolated keratocytes were expanded and differentiated into fibroblasts by culturing in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. After 1-2 passages, when the cells had reached at least 80%–90% confluence, the media were changed to DMEM without serum. Twenty-four hours later the media were collected and used immediately. This fibroblasts conditioned media (CM) was mixed in keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM; Invitrogen), plus DMEM + Ham’s F12 in equal ratio.

2.3. Decellularization of Human Cornea

Corneas were subjected to a stepwise treatment with nonsurfactant treatment involving incubation in 1.5 M sodium chloride (NaCl) solution for 48 h with NaCl change after 24 h in the first step. In the second step, corneas were treated with DNAse 5 U/mL and RNAse 5 U/mL (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h. Corneas were then washed with PBS for 72 h with PBS changed every 24 h. The decellularization procedure was carried out at room temperature under continuous agitation.

2.4. Laser Induced Limbal Injury Model

A novel laser ablation technique was used to create reproducible focal injuries to the limbal epithelium in vivo. This technique was developed to have precise control over the size and depth of destroyed epithelium and underlying stroma. This was done using a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser system in adult Lewis rats. The rats were placed under anesthesia using an injection of ketamine hydrochloride (100 mg/kg IP) and xylazine (5 mg/kg IP) hydrochloride intraperitoneally. For local anesthesia, one drop of proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% was applied to the eye. A 1.5 mm spot size was used to ablate a limbal area of  mm2 in size and 100 μm in depth.

As a comparison to the laser ablation model, alkali injury and mechanical epithelium debridement injury models were also studied in a mouse’s eyes (data not shown). Mechanical debridement was performed using a 23 G needle to remove the epithelium in a focal area. Alkali injury was done using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with concentrations ranging from 0.25 M to 1 M applied to the eye for 30 seconds.

2.5. Transplantation of a Decellularized Limbal Graft in a Rat Eye

Lamellar transplantation of decellularized limbal grafts was performed on rat eyes following laser injury (Figure 1). The process of preparing the graft for transplantation involved a lamellar dissection to separate the anterior half of the limbus and discarding the posterior stroma, Descemet’s membrane, and the endothelial cells. This decellularized limbal graft was secured to the lasered area of the rat eye using interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures. Immediately after the procedure, antibiotic ointment (Bacitracin) was applied to the eye. The antibiotics were given once a day for 7 days. In control rats, only laser injuries were performed without transplantation of a graft. After one week, the rats were euthanized and the eyes were enucleated and subjected to immunohistologic evaluation.

2.6. Slit-Lamp Imaging

The clinical status of the ocular surface in rats was assessed on days 0, 3, and 7 after transplantation. Using a slit-lamp microscope, the degree of opacity, inflammation, and neovascularization was monitored. Epithelialization was assessed by fluorescein staining of the cornea.

2.7. Immunohistologic Evaluation

The corneas were embedded in OCT then cut into 10 μm sections. The tissue sections were briefly fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min followed by permeabilization in 0.3% Triton-X in tris buffered saline (TBS) for 10 min at room temperature. The sections were blocked with 10% donkey serum with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBS for 1 h at room temperature. The primary antibodies used were mouse anti-p63 (1 : 100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-Ki67 (1 : 50 Epitomics) or goat anti-keratin 12 antibody (1 : 50, Santa Cruz). The primary antibodies were incubated either overnight at 4°C or for 2 h at room temperature.

A fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated donkey anti-rabbit or anti-mouse or rhodamine conjugated donkey anti-goat (all 1 : 300–400, Jackson ImmunoResearch) was applied for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. For negative control, the primary antibody incubation step was omitted or instead an isotype control was used. Slides were cover-slipped with mounting medium with or without DAPI and images were visualized using a Zeiss Axiovert fluorescence microscope and photographed with an AxioCam (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) camera.

3. Results

3.1. In Vitro Evaluation of Epithelial Cells on Decellularized Cornea and Limbus

In a previous study, we showed that our decellularization method maintained the integrity of the extracellular matrix and basement membrane in the limbal area [20]. In this study, we evaluated the cellular phenotype of the epithelial cells cultured over the limbal and central corneal. The epithelial cells grown on the decellularized limbus presented with a higher degree of proliferation compared to those in the central cornea (Figure 2). Likewise, a higher percentage of cells expressed the limbal stem cell marker DeltaNp63 in the limbal versus central matrix. The results of this experiment show that the decellularized limbal matrix helps support a limbal (i.e., less differentiated and more proliferative) phenotype in the epithelial cells.

3.2. Excimer Laser Focal Limbal Injury Model

We initially tested mechanical and chemical (alkali) measures to create focal limbal injuries. Mechanical debridement was found to only remove the epithelium with minimal injury to the underlying stroma. On the other hand, alkali injury resulted in extensive damage to the surrounding tissue leading to significant inflammation and corneal opacification (data not shown). The extent of limbal injury was highly variable with the alkali injury. The excimer laser, however, created consistent and reproducible levels of epithelial and stromal damage. Upon examination with slit-lamp microscope, a positive fluorescein staining in cornea after laser injury confirmed the absence of the epithelium. Also, upon gross inspection, the laser epithelium removal did not induce excessive inflammation in the cornea (Figure 3). The laser injury method was chosen to study the decellularized limbal grafts.

3.3. In Vivo Evaluation of Decellularized Limbal Grafts after Focal Limbal Injury

We studied the in vivo effects of decellularized limbal tissue in the rat eye following laser ablation of the limbus. The eyes were followed for a period of one week (Figure 3). While both grafted and nongrafted control eyes completely epithelialized within 3 days, the eyes that received grafts healed faster with minimal fluorescein staining and stromal haze. In contrast, the eyes without a graft demonstrated late staining with fluorescein (indicating a compromised epithelial barrier) and greater stromal haze (Figure 4). In addition, the non-grafted eyes demonstrated greater degree of peripheral neovascularization compared to the eyes that received a decellularized limbal graft (Figure 5).

The eyes were removed and sectioned for histological analysis. The grafts were found to have stratified epithelium growing on top with the presence of inflammatory cells in the stroma. Epithelial cells growing on the graft displayed positive staining for keratin 12, a marker for corneal epithelial differentiation (Figure 4).

A total of 8 grafts were performed. In successful grafts, we observed epithelialization of the graft in one week. But in the earlier cases, where thicker grafts had been used, we observed ingrowth of host corneal epithelial cells into the host-graft junction. The host cornea became opaque and neovascularization occurred, resulting in separation and extrusion of the graft.

4. Discussion

In this study, we have first shown that a decellularized limbal matrix can maintain a more limbal phenotype in vitro. Specifically, the corneal epithelial cells grown on the decellularized limbus had higher expression of the proliferation maker Ki67 and stem cell marker DeltaNp63 compared to those in the central cornea. These results highlight the critical role of the basement membrane in maintaining the limbal stem cell/progenitor cells. Previous studies have similarly demonstrated the importance of the limbal microenvironment in the limbal stem cell function [22].

We then proceeded with in vivo experiments to test the effect of decellularized limbal constructs. We devised a novel laser ablation method to create well defined and reproducible limbal injuries. Chemical injuries have traditionally been used to create limbal injuries and limbal stem cell deficiency [23, 24]. However, in our model we wanted to specifically create only focal injury and NaOH was found to cause excessive and variable degrees of stromal destruction. The main advantage of using the excimer laser is the opportunity to control the ablation depth to remove the epithelium and the immediate underlying matrix.

The excimer laser has been in use for over two decades in refractive surgery. The Nidek EC-5000 laser system used in this study uses a 193 nm wavelength laser to efficiently remove corneal layers while limiting collateral thermal damage to the surrounding tissues [25]. The components of the corneal stroma, such as proteins, glycosaminoglycans, and nucleic acids, absorb energy of this wavelength and prevent any secondary mechanical shock-waves from transmitting through the eye, thus reducing any unwanted damage [26]. Our study is the first to use excimer to create an experimental model of limbal injury. It will be interesting to further investigate this limbal stem cell deficiency model with various degrees of limbal injury

Our in vivo results showed that the limbal extracellular matrix has a therapeutic effect on healing the epithelium and corneal surface. It was evident that as early as 7 days, the corneal surface damaged by laser ablation had healed better and appeared clearer with very little haze and neovascularization compared to the control nongrafted eyes. The grafts were covered by epithelium demonstrating a corneal phenotype. At one week the grafts did not show any infiltration of fibroblasts into the transplanted graft. The keratocytes in the cornea are normally in a quiescent state which suggests that a longer time must be required to see any cell growth into the graft. It has been shown that any surgical incision or mechanical stress on the cornea that damages the tissue causes the keratocytes within 200–300 μm of the cut to undergo apoptosis within a few hours after the surgery [27]. This creates a region of tissue devoid of cells surrounding the site of injury. A study on decellularized porcine corneal grafts observed a period of 4 weeks after grafting before infiltration of rabbit keratocytes [28]. Therefore, a longer study period is required to observe the migration of fibroblasts into the graft.

In summary, we have reported early in vivo data that a decellularized limbal graft can promote epithelial healing and restoration of the corneal epithelium. This opens the possibility of using decellularization grafts in corneal and limbal tissue engineering.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. M. Davanger and A. Evensen, “Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium,” Nature, vol. 229, no. 5286, pp. 560–561, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Schermer, S. Galvin, and T.-T. Sun, “Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. C. G. Tseng, “Concept and application of limbal stem cells,” Eye, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 141–157, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. M. Lavker, S. C. G. Tseng, and T.-T. Sun, “Corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus: looking at some old problems from a new angle,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 433–446, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. J. Y. Chen and S. C. G. Tseng, “Corneal epithelial wound healing in partial limbal deficiency,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1301–1314, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. J. W. Huang and S. C. G. Tseng, “Corneal epithelial wound healing in the absence of limbal epithelium,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 96–105, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. P. de Miguel, J. L. Alio, F. Arnalich-Montiel et al., “Cornea and ocular surface treatment,” Current Stem Cell Research and Therapy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 195–204, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Han, I. R. Schwab, T. K. Madsen, and R. R. Isseroff, “A fibrin-based bioengineered ocular surface with human corneal epithelial stem cells,” Cornea, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 505–510, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Griffith, R. Osborne, R. Munger et al., “Functional human corneal equivalents constructed from cell lines,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5447, pp. 2169–2172, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. J. Carlsson, F. Li, S. Shimmura, and M. Griffith, “Bioengineered corneas: how close are we?” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 192–197, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Nishida, M. Yamato, Y. Hayashida et al., “Functional bioengineered corneal epithellial sheet grafts from corneal stem cells expanded ex vivo on a temperature-responsive cell culture surface,” Transplantation, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 379–385, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Menzel-Severing, “Emerging techniques to treat limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency,” Discovery Medicine, vol. 11, no. 56, pp. 57–64, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Pauklin, T. A. Fuchsluger, H. Westekemper, K.-P. Steuhl, and D. Meller, “Midterm results of cultivated autologous and allogeneic limbal epithelial transplantation in limbal stem cell deficiency,” Developments in Ophthalmology, vol. 45, pp. 57–70, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Osei-Bempong, C. Henein, and S. Ahmad, “Culture conditions for primary human limbal epithelial cells,” Regenerative Medicine, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 461–470, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Li, D. Carlsson, C. Lohmann et al., “Cellular and nerve regeneration within a biosynthetic extracellular matrix for corneal transplantation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 26, pp. 15346–15351, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Shimmura, C. J. Doillon, M. Griffith et al., “Collagen-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based membranes for corneal stroma scaffolds,” Cornea, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. S81–S88, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  17. T. V. Chirila, “An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application,” Biomaterials, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 3311–3317, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. J.-F. Tsai and R. Y.-N. Tsai, “Ex vivo expansion of corneal stem cells on amniotic membrane and their outcome,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 305–309, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Grueterich, E. M. Espana, and S. C. G. Tseng, “Ex vivo expansion of limbal epithelial stem cells: amniotic membrane serving as a stem cell niche,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 631–646, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. A. Shafiq, R. A. Gemeinhart, B. Y. J. T. Yue, and A. R. Djalilian, “Decellularized human cornea for reconstructing the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma,” Tissue Engineering C, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 340–348, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. R. Djalilian, A. Namavari, A. Ito et al., “Down-regulation of Notch signaling during corneal epithelial proliferation,” Molecular Vision, vol. 14, pp. 1041–1049, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  22. T. Kawakita, E. M. Espana, H. He, W. Li, C.-Y. Liu, and S. G. G. Tseng, “Intrastromal invasion by limbal epithelial cells is mediated by epithelial-mesenchymal transition activated by air exposure,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 381–393, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  23. S.-E. Ti, D. Anderson, A. Touhami, C. Kim, and S. C. G. Tseng, “Factors affecting outcome following transplantation of ex vivo expanded limbal epithelium on amniotic membrane for total limbal deficiency in rabbits,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2584–2592, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  24. F. L. Gimeno, V. Lavigne, S. Gatto, J. O. Croxatto, L. Correa, and J. E. Gallo, “Advances in corneal stem-cell transplantation in rabbits with severe ocular alkali burns,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1958–1965, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Sakimoto, M. I. Rosenblatt, and D. T. Azar, “Laser eye surgery for refractive errors,” The Lancet, vol. 367, no. 9520, pp. 1432–1447, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. E. E. Manche, J. D. Carr, W. W. Haw, and P. S. Hersh, “Excimer laser refractive surgery,” Western Journal of Medicine, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. E. Fini, “Keratocyte and fibroblast phenotypes in the repairing cornea,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 529–551, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. X.-C. Lin, Y.-N. Hui, Y.-S. Wang, H. Meng, Y.-J. Zhang, and Y. Jin, “Lamellar keratoplasty with a graft of lyophilized acellular porcine corneal stroma in the rabbit,” Veterinary Ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 61–66, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Maryam A. Shafiq et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.