Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
Volume 2011, Article ID 308685, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/308685
Clinical Study

Should Endovascular Repair Be Reimbursed for Low Risk Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients? Evidence from Ontario, Canada

1Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8P 1H1
2Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC), London, ON, Canada
3Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada

Received 3 February 2011; Revised 15 April 2011; Accepted 16 April 2011

Academic Editor: Bhagwan Satiani

Copyright © 2011 Jean-Eric Tarride et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Medical Advisory Secretariat, “Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Tech. Rep., Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Toronto, Canada, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee, “OHTAC Recommendation Based on the Final Report of the Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute Field Evaluation of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (EVAR) in Ontario December 15,” Tech. Rep., 2006. View at Google Scholar
  3. T. F. Lindsay, “Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery consensus statement on endovascular aneurysm repair,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 172, no. 7, pp. 867–868, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee, “OHTAC Recommendation Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms for Low Surgical Risk Patients,” Tech. Rep., 2010. View at Google Scholar
  5. N. Hay, F. McCracken, J. Richardson, E. George, and D. Barnett, “Endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: NICE technology appraisal guidance,” Heart, vol. 95, no. 21, pp. 1798–1800, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, “Endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Faizer, G. DeRose, D. K. Lawlor, K. A. Harris, and T. L. Forbes, “Objective scoring systems of medical risk: a clinical tool for selecting patients for open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1102–e2, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. E. Tarride, G. Blackhouse, G. De Rose et al., “Cost-effectiveness analysis of elective endovascular repair compared with open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms for patients at a high surgical risk: a 1-year patient-level analysis conducted in Ontario, Canada,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 779–787, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. C. Jonk, R. L. Kane, F. A. Lederle, R. MacDonald, A. H. Cutting, and T. J. Wilt, “Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 205–215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Chambers, D. Epstein, S. Walker et al., “Endovascular stents for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and economic model,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 13, no. 48, pp. 215–318, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. C. Young, N. A. Awad, M. Johansson, D. Gillespie, M. J. Singh, and K. A. Illig, “Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair based on aneurysm size,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Blackhouse, R. Hopkins, J. M. Bowen et al., “A cost-effectiveness model comparing endovascular repair to open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Canada,” Value in Health, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 245–252, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Fotis, G. Tsoumakidou, T. Katostaras et al., “Cost and effectiveness comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-center experience,” Journal of Vascular Nursing, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Mani, M. Björck, J. Lundkvist, and A. Wanhainen, “Similar cost for elective open and endovascular AAA repair in a population-based setting,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. M. Epstein, M. J. Sculpher, A. Manca et al., “Modelling the long-term cost-effectiveness of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 183–190, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. H. Hollier, L. M. Taylor, and J. Ochsner, “Recommended indications for operative treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1046–1056, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. L. Chaikof, J. D. Blankensteijn, P. L. Harris et al., “Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1048–1060, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. Muszbek, M. M. Thompson, C. V. Soong, J. Hutton, P. Brasseur, and M. R. H. M. van Sambeek, “Systematic review of utilities in abdominal aortic aneurysm,” European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 283–289, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. A. Lederle, J. A. Freischlag, T. C. Kyriakides et al., “Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 302, no. 14, pp. 1535–1542, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Soulez, E. Thérasse, A. A. T. Monfared et al., “Pain and quality of life assessment after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients at low risk,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1093–1100, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Aljabri, K. Al Wahaibi, D. Abner et al., “Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1182–e2, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. L. Ballard, A. M. Abou-Zamzam, T. H. Teruya et al., “Quality of life before and after endovascular and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 797–803, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. F. Dick, V. Grobéty, F. F. Immer et al., “Outcome and quality of life in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a single center experience,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 987–994, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. M. Greenhalgh, “Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9478, pp. 2187–2192, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. E. M. Lottman, R. J. F. Laheij, P. W. M. Cuypers, M. Bender, and J. Buth, “Health-related quality of life outcomes following elective open or endovascular AAA repair: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 323–329, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Prinssen, E. Buskens, J. D. Blankensteijn et al., “Quality of life after endovascular and open AAA repair. Results of a randomised trial,” European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. E. Ware, K. K. Snow, M. Kosinski et al., SF-36 Health Survey, Manual and Interpretation Guide, Nimrod Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1993.
  28. P. Dolan, “Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states,” Medical Care, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1095–1108, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Prinssen, E. L. G. Verhoeven, J. Buth et al., “A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 16, pp. 1607–1618, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J.-P. Becquemin, J.-C. Pillet, F. Lescalie et al., “A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1167–1173, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. R. Hopkins, J. Bowen, K. Campbell et al., “Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR,” Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1011–1022, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. L. De Bruin, A. F. Baas, J. Buth et al., “Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 20, pp. 1881–1889, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus