Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Zoology
Volume 2009, Article ID 979512, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/979512
Research Article

Comparative Reproduction Aspects of the Deep-water Shrimps Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus (Decapoda, Aristeidae) in the Greek Ionian Sea (Eastern Mediterranean)

1Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources, 46.7 km Athens-Sounio, Mavro Lithari, P.O. Box 712, 19013 Anavissos Attika, Greece
2Departement of Zoology-Marine Biology, School of Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 157 84 Athens, Greece

Received 26 May 2008; Accepted 23 September 2008

Academic Editor: Alan Hodgson

Copyright © 2009 K. Kapiris and M. Thessalou-Legaki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In the eastern Ionian Sea, the deep-water shrimps Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus constitute a virgin fishing resource, since their maximum abundance depth exceeds commercial exploitation depths. The two sympatric species share a number of common reproductive features, such as summer reproduction. A slight temporal shift in mating activity, ovarian maturation, and spawning period was observed between species. The most notable difference was the more pronounced seasonality in reproductive activity of Aristeus antennatus compared to that of A. foliacea as evidenced by the frequency of inseminated females and functionally mature males, as well as by the shorter ovarian maturation period. Nevertheless, regarding the whole life span, both sexes of Aristeus antennatus exhibit a more extended reproductive activity in comparison to A. foliacea. No notable differentiation of both species existed in comparison to other Mediterranean regions.

1. Introduction

The two red shrimps, Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) and Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) (Decapoda, Aristeidae), constitute the main target species for the demersal deep-water fishery in the Western and Central Mediterranean, captured exclusively by trawlers on muddy bottoms, especially near submarine trenches and canyons. Recently, new evidence from Greek waters suggested that both resources are adequate for exploitation at depths greater than 400 m, where at present almost no traditional commercial trawling exists [13].

A. foliacea is a cosmopolitan species while the geographical distributionof Aristeus antennatus is confined in the Mediterranean and the eastern-central Atlantic. Nevertheless, Aristeus antennatus is eurybathic with a documented depth of occurrence ranging from 80 to 3300 m ([4] and references therein), while A. foliacea has been recorded until now at depths from 123 to 1100 m ([5] and references therein). Another important feature is the longitudinal differentiation of the two species along the Mediterranean: A. foliacea increases in abundance from the western to the eastern Mediterranean, while the opposite is true for Aristeus antennatus.

For both species, an actual or potential commercial interest has resulted in studies on their fisheries biology and ecology, mostly concentrated in the western and central Mediterranean (see references in [4, 5]). Relatively less information exists on their reproductive biology (e.g., [611]), while larval life and recruitment are still obscure.

As opposed to the western Mediterranean, the two red shrimps coexist in the eastern Ionian both horizontally and vertically in an almost virgin condition. This was considered as an excellent opportunity for obtaining comparable data on their reproduction. In addition, such data, obtained for the first time for the eastern Mediterranean, could serve in the comparison of life history traits along the Mediterranean.

2. Materials and Methods

Shrimps were collected on a monthly basis (December 1996 to November 1997) in the Greek Ionian Sea between Peloponnisos and Zakynthos Island (depth range: 446–728 m) (Figure 1), using a commercial trawl (18 mm at the cod end). In totally, 90 hauls were carried out, in which 37301 A. foliacea specimens (17148 females, 20153 males) and 8574 A. antennatus individuals (7272 females, 1302 males) were caught. They were sexed and measured for carapace length (CL, mm) to the nearest 0.01 mm. The wet body weight (BW, g) was also measured with 0.001 g accuracy.

979512.fig.001
Figure 1: Map of the research area (A = deep waters of the North Ionian Sea, B = sampling area with sampling stations (#)).

Ovarian maturity stages and spermatophore presence in the thelycum (inseminated specimens) were recorded from fresh specimens by macroscopic observation using the empirical scales of [12] for A. foliacea (N = 1202) and [13] for Aristeus antennatus (N = 1487). Four stages of development were established based on the ovarian color and size: stage I: undeveloped; stage II: developing; stage III: mature; stage IV: spawning. In the present study, recently spent individuals (SPs) were separated from those belonging to stage I. For the sake of comparison with other studies, three size groups have been defined for females: CL < 30 mm (small), 30 < CL < 40 mm (medium), and CL > 40 mm (large).

The gonad wet weight (GWW, g) and the gonad dry weight (GDW, g) (the gonads were dried in a Mement Rost Frei oven at 80° for 1 hour) were measured to the nearest 0.0001 g from 214 and 83, randomly chosen, individuals of A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus, respectively. The relationship between gonad wet weight and gonad dry weight for each species was expressed in terms of linear regressions F = a + bx, where F = dry weight and X = wet weight, a = constant and b = slope. The difference between the dry and wet gonad weights is the estimated water content. Gonadosomatic index (GSI) was estimated from, randomly chosen, 502 females of A. foliacea and 384 females of Aristeus antennatus as 100*(GWW/BW), where BW = body weight.

Data from the spawning season (June-August) were used for the determination of CL50mf (the size at which 50% of females have reached maturity, stage IV) by applying a typical sigmoid symmetrical curve (logistic regression method in statgraphics 5.1 plus) P = 1/[1+e(ax+bCL)], where P is the percentage of sexually mature individuals by size class (CL), and a, b are constants [14]. The same equation was used for the estimation of CL50sf (size at which 50% of females bore spermatophore on their thelycum).

Male maturity was checked, in a great subsample, by the presence of the spermatophores in the terminal ampoullae of vasa deferentia [13] in 1525 and 503 males of A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus, respectively. CL50sm (size at which 50% of males are reproductive) was determined as above.

Statistical differences between the two species were tested by the nonparametric Mann-Whitney, Kruskall-Whallis, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests [15]. We deemed only those independent variables with P < .05 to be significant.

3. Results

3.1. Spermatophore Presence

Mating activity of both species, as depicted by the frequency of females bearing spermatophores on their thelycum (Figure 2), was found to be consistently high (>75%) for a long period (from spring to the beginning of autumn). It seemed, however, that, although A. foliacea’s mating activity decreased, it did not cease totally in late autumn-early winter as in Aristeus antennatus, and was already pronounced earlier (February). The occurrence of the inseminated individuals among the months was not statistically different between the two species (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P > .05). In both species, there was a statistically significant difference between female median CL with and without spermatophores (Mann-Whitney test, P < .05). Thus inseminated females were on average larger than noninseminated (CL ±SD): mated  mm CL versus noninseminated  mm CL in A. foliacea, and inseminated  mm CL versus noninseminated  mm CL in Aristeus antennatus, in the whole study period. The smallest mated female was 25 mm and 18 mm CL, for A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus, respectively.

979512.fig.002
Figure 2: Monthly spermatophore occurrence in Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus females from the eastern Ionian Sea.

During the study period, a size segregation was obvious in both species regarding the start of mating after oviposition (Table 1): only the largest females were found mated just after the reproductive season (see below) in November (A. foliacea) or January (Aristeus antennatus), followed progressively thereafter by medium sized females. It is worth noting that few mated small individuals (CL < 30 mm) of A. foliacea occurred only in July, whereas those of Aristeus antennatus were present from May to October in comparable frequencies to other size groups. As a result, larger females of both species exhibited a longer mating period than smaller ones. During the reproductive period (April–September), all females of A. foliacea sized between 34 and 53 mm CL were carrying spermatophores on their thelycum. Similarly, in the period May–September, all Aristeus antennatus females between 37 and 55 mm CL were inseminated.

tab1
Table 1: Monthly spermatophore and mature ovaries occurrence (%) per size group for A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus.
3.2. Ovary Maturation

Although females with immature ovaries of both aristeids were present throughout the year, all females caught from October to March in A. foliacea and from October to April in Aristeus antennatus exhibited immature ovaries (Figure 3). In both species, the ovarian maturation process (appearance of stages III and IV) seemed to be rapid, lasting one to two months. The first mature females of A. foliacea were observed (both stages III and IV = 2.6%) in spring and summer, especially in April and peaking in June (both stages III and IV = 88%) and decreasing progressively during the rest of summer (July, August). In Aristeus antennatus, the first females with mature ovaries (stages III, IV) were found one month later (May, both stages III and IV = 11.3%), increasing in June (both stages III and IV = 52%), and reaching a maximum in July (both stages III and IV = 92%). Spent individuals appeared in July (16%) for A. foliacea and already in June (27%) for Aristeus antennatus. It seems, therefore, that although both sympatric species are summer breeders, A. foliacea has a rather earlier and more extended spawning period than Aristeus antennatus, in which reproduction processes seem to be more accelerated.

fig3
Figure 3: Monthly occurrence of ovarian maturity stages of Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus females from the eastern Ionian Sea.

The smallest female of A. foliacea with developed ovaries (stage III) measured 36 mm CL and that of Aristeus antennatus 26 mm CL.

In accordance with the observation concerning the relationship between female size and mating period, medium and larger females of both species showed earlier ovarian maturation than smaller ones (Table 1). In spring, especially April and May, only large A. foliacea exhibited developed ovaries (CL range: 52–66 mm), while in summer, medium sized females entered mature condition (CL range: 32–56 mm). Finally, at the end of the reproduction period in September, only large females were still reproductive (CL range: 5056 mm). It is worth mentioning that smaller A. foliacea females did not contribute to the reproductive pool. In Aristeus antennatus, on the other hand, large- and medium-sized females showed comparable percentages in ovary maturation during end of spring-early summer (May and June) (CL range: 32–56 m), whereas smaller individuals, CL range: 26–64 mm, became mature in July. Thus A. foliacea large females have a more extended reproductive period (6 months) than medium sized (3 months), while small ones are not reproductive. In Aristeus antennatus, on the other hand, large and medium females with mature ovaries occur for a four-month period, while smaller ones appear only during the peak of the reproductive season.

Regarding female functional maturity (i.e., the cooccurrence of inseminated and individuals with mature ovaries), more than 60% of females with resting ovaries (stage I) in both species had already mated. This percentage increased to more than 90% in females with a more advanced ovarian stage. A considerable number of inseminated females were found after oviposition (38% in A. foliacea and 44% in Aristeus antennatus).

3.3. Gonad Weight and Gonadosomatic Index

The mean gonad wet and dry weight per maturity stage are given in Table 2 for both species. There is a statistically significant difference among the medians of both gonad weights per stage in both aristeids (Kruskall-Wallis test, P = .011). Both gonads weights increased from immature to mature specimens and the obtained values of the spent individuals were between the stages I and II for both species. The included water in the gonads decreased from the first to fourth stage due to the yolk storage.

tab2
Table 2: Mean wet gonad weight, dry gonad weight (g), water content (% of wet gonad weight) and standard deviation (±SD) prematurity stage in A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus females.

Females A. foliacea presented statistically higher mean values of gonad wet weight in stages 1, IV and gonad dry weight in stages I, II, SP than those of Aristeus antennatus (Mann-Whitney test, P < .05). Females Aristeus antennatus presented a statistically higher mean value of gonad wet weight in stage II (Mann-Whitney test, P < .05). Almost all the values of water content in the gonads of A. foliacea per stage were statistically significantly higher than those of Aristeus antennatus (Mann-Whitney test, P < .05). The relationship between the gonad wet weight (GWW) and gonad dry weight (GDW) for each species was expressed by the equations

For both species, average GSI increased with ovarian maturity (Table 3), spent ovary GSI being between that of stage II and I. Monthly average GSI varied seasonally (Figure 4) reaching a maximum in summer (June, July) (7.1%) for A. foliacea and in the same season (July, August) (7.2%) for Aristeus antennatus. The average GSI did not statistically differ among the months between the two decapods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P > .05).

tab3
Table 3: Female average gonadosomatic index (±SD) of A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus according to the ovarian maturity stage.
979512.fig.004
Figure 4: Temporal variation of gonadosomatic index (GSI), of Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus from the eastern Ionian Sea.
3.4. Size at First Female Maturity

Based on the percentages of fully mature ovaries and the presence of spermatophore by size class, the 50% size at first maturity (CL50mf and CL50sf, resp.) was determined (Table 4). In both species, CL50sf (36.84 mm CL for A. foliacea, 26.03 mm CL for A. antennatus) was lower than CL50mf, (38.84 mm CL for A. foliacea, 29.45 mm CL for A. antennatus) indicating that gonad maturity follows insemination. Both estimates of size at first maturity showed that Aristeus antennatus females attain maturity at a smaller size than A. foliacea.

tab4
Table 4: Elements of the logistic model (P = 1/[1+e(ax+bCL)]) for the mature (CLmf), mated (CLsf) females and mature males (CLsm) of A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus.
3.5. Maturity of Males

The presence of the spermatophores in the terminal ampoullae in males among the months did not differ statistically between the two sexes (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P > .05). Although, in A. foliacea, the occurrence of reproductive males was consistently very high during the whole study period (87–100%), it varied widely in Aristeus antennatus (Figure 5). In the latter species, spermatophore-bearing males existed in high percentages before and at the beginning of female reproductive period (January to May), while only spermatophore-deprived males existed in the middle of the reproductive period (June), increasing thereafter until its end. In accordance with the absence of Aristeus antennatus-inseminated females during November and December; no male was found reproductive at that period. The smallest reproductive male measured 26 mm and 20 mm CL, in A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus, respectively. As in females, Aristeus antennatus males seemed to mature at a significantly smaller size than those of A. foliacea (P = .001) (Table 4).

979512.fig.005
Figure 5: Monthly occurrence of reproductive males of Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus from the eastern Ionian Sea.

4. Discussion

In the Greek Ionian Sea, fishing pressure in depths beyond 500 m is almost absent. As a result, both aristeids constitute an unexploited resource for this area, with a potential to support a viable fishery [2, 3]. The unexploited status of both red shrimps is reflected in the presence of relatively higher percentage of large shrimp in comparison to other Mediterranean regions [16]. The relative abundance of the two species in the study area [3] conforms to the general longitudinal differentiation of the two species along the Mediterranean: A. foliacea shows greater abundances in the central-eastern part, while Aristeus antennatus in the western part.

The results of the present study demonstrated the high-reproductive capacity of both red shrimps in the study area. A remarkable succession concerning maturing, mating, oocytes’ release of both species, and sexes was shown. This seasonality is a common phenomenon within the Dendrobranchiata [17]. According to [18, 19], the most feasible pattern of these processes during a month, at least in Aristeus antennatus, is the following: initial ovary development, molting, mating, vitellogenesis, and spawning.

Nevertheless, in the study area A. foliacea presented weaker seasonality in mating than Aristeus antennatus in which a remarkable synchronism in fertilization exists as depicted by the sharp increase of inseminated females just before and during the reproductive season. The main mating period (>50% mated females) lasts longer in the eastern Ionian (10 months for A. foliacea and 7 months for Aristeus antennatus) than in Sardinian waters (8 months for A. foliacea and 6 months for Aristeus antennatus) [7] or the Balearic Islands (4 months for Aristeus antennatus) [18, 19].

The longer mating and reproductive period of larger individuals in both species from the eastern Ionian has been also pointed out from other localities (e.g., A. foliacea: [20] in the western Ionian Sea; Aristeus antennatus: [21, 22]). In Aristeus antennatus, this longer period of spermatophore carrying in the thelycum could be related to possible recoupling of these individuals during the same reproductive period resulting in more than one spawning [18, 19]. Nevertheless, based on the mature follicle presence and the duration of ovarian maturation, [23] it is concluded that a single batch of oocytes should develop at each reproductive period. It is worth mentioning that in the eastern Ionian, in spite the fact that males in general and especially those capable of mating are drastically decreased in the middle of the reproductive season (June to August), spermatophore presence in females remains at the same levels. This discrepancy can be possibly explained the ability of males to mate with multiple females: as it is already known from studies in the western Mediterranean, the species forms aggregations of reproductive females in a similar to the present study depth range and copulation takes place with males represented in low percentages in the beginning of the shoal formation (see [4] for references). Multiple spawnings could more likely occur in A. foliacea, since in the latest ovarian stage only half of the oocytes are fully mature, the rest being in previous stages [12, 24], and, according to the present study, mature males exist throughout the reproductive period in high percentages.

Regarding the relationship between mating and gonad maturity, the highest proportion of the noninseminated females of both species belonged to stage I (immature). Main mating activity precedes the appearance of gonad maturation by four months in A. foliacea (January–April) and by only two months in Aristeus antennatus (March-April). This difference could be attributed to the fact that Aristeus antennatus males are mainly distributed in deeper waters and enter the female shoal for copulation in late spring, while in the depth range sampled, A. foliacea males and females coexist, with sex ratio exhibiting a slight predominance of males [3]. For both species, it can be suggested that ovary development is induced by copulation [23, 24]. Greek stock of both species seems to agree, in general, with the maturation behavior of other Mediterranean populations: from the western Ionian Sea [20, 25, 26] and Sicily [8] for A. foliacea, and from the Ligurian Sea [13, 21, 22], Ibiza Channel [18, 19], Portugal [25, 26], Spain [18, 19, 23], and Algerian waters [27] for Aristeus antennatus. Although some unessential differences have been reported among the several areas of the Mediterranean.

Nevertheless, A. foliacea precedes Aristeus antennatus for about a month with respect to mating, ovary maturation, and spawning. This shift in timing of the reproductive components of the two aristeids has been also recorded in Sicilian waters, where also the two species coexist [7].

The fully mature female minimum size of A. foliacea in the present study (36 mm CL) seems to be in the upper part of the range recorded from the Mediterranean (23–40 mm CL) (see [5]) and belongs to 1+ age group, while that of Aristeus antennatus seems to be the smallest so far recorded and belongs to 0+ age group. Thus in the Greek Ionian Sea, Aristeus antennatus is already sexually active from its first year of life, having a greater ovogenetic activity than A. foliacea. This more extensive activity of Aristeus antennatus is documented by the minimum CL for mature individuals as well as and the smaller size at first maturity for both sexes, in relation to A. foliacea.

Reference [28] hypothesized that the younger individuals of Aristeus antennatus mature for the first time in June because of the puberty moult that delays deposition time and have fewer spawnings. Since this species has an open thelycum, mating and fertilization are completely external processes and the spermatophore is shed off at each molting [29]. Thus at least in the larger specimens, the processes of molting activity, the refertilization, and the multiple spawning in the same reproductive period could be explained.

Regarding GSI monthly values and prematurity stage, the obtained values in this study were in the value range from other studies. Thus for A. foliacea the estimated GSI values were slightly lower than those from Sicily [12] and Taiwan [24] but higher than those from the western Ionian Sea [30]. Similarly, the GSI values for Aristeus antennatus were higher than those from the Balearic Islands [18, 19] and similar to those from Sicily [31] and the Catalan Sea [18, 19]. In the present study, the two species seem to have comparable reproductive effort, which is directed toward fewer but larger ova in A. foliacea or numerous smaller ones in Aristeus antennatus [11].

CL50sf and CL50mf from the eastern Ionian Sea seem to be close to the lower values reported in the literature for both species. Thus CL50sf ranges from 34 mm CL (north-eastern Tyrrhenian Sea; [32] 0 to 46.6 mm CL (central Tyrrhenian; [33] for A. foliacea, and from 24–28 mm CL (Spanish waters; [34]) to 28.8 mm CL (French coast; [35]) in Aristeus antennatus. Also, CL50mf ranges from 36 mm CL (Sardinian waters; [7]) to 43 mm CL (western Ionian Sea; [20]) in A. foliacea, and from 18 mm CL (Sardinian waters; [7]) to 35 mm CL (western Ionian Sea; [25, 26]) in Aristeus antennatus.

In the study area, A. foliacea males were ready to copulate throughout the year, while in Aristeus antennatus male reproductive activity was pronounced during late winter-late spring (January-May). The fact that males of both red shrimps have a more extensive reproductive activity than females is related to the observation that immature females receive the spermatophores from the mature males and conserve them till their sexual maturation. This prolonged reproductive activity of both red shrimp males has been also reported from other authors. For Aristeus antennatus, [13, 1820, 34] pointed out that mature males appear all year round, but, unlike the present results, their highest reproductive activity is observed between late spring-late summer (from May to August). In comparison to other Mediterranean regions, a general tendency for an earlier attainment of male maturity was evident in the present study. The smallest mature male of A. foliacea (26 mm CL), for example, is almost the smallest ever reported (from 25 mm CL in western Ionian Sea [20] to 30 mm CL in Sardinia [36]), while that of Aristeus antennatus (20 mm CL) lies toward the lower limit of the value range (15.9–26 mm CL in the Catalan Sea) [18, 19, 25, 26]. In addition, the present value for CL50sm for Aristeus antennatus (19.36 mm CL) is lower than any value in literature (range from 20 mm CL, Catalan Sea—Demestre, 1990—to 25 mm CL, western Ionian; [25, 26]). Like females, the males of the later species were sexually active within the first year of their life.

In conclusion, the study of the main aspects of reproduction of A. foliacea and Aristeus antennatus in the eastern Ionian Sea revealed that both species seem to conform to the other Mediterranean regions with regard to their major reproductive traits (i.e., reproductive period, presence of mature males throughout the year, and longer mating and reproductive period in A. foliacea than in Aristeus antennatus, etc.). The only life-history trait that seems to slightly differentiate the eastern populations of both species is an earlier attainment of sexual maturity in both sexes. This differentiation could be also attributed to the considerably higher water temperature in the eastern Ionian Sea than in the western most areas [37]. Nevertheless, in order to arrive to secure conclusions, our knowledge on the eastern Mediterranean deep-sea shrimp has to be improved by further studies on these populations and also by including a broader ecosystem approach.

Acknowledgments

The material was collected during sampling cruises within the research program “Deep Water Fisheries” partly supported by the EU (FAIR 95-0655). Many thanks are due to Dr. C. Papaconstantinou and Mr. G. Petrakis (Hellenic Centre for Marine Research) responsible for the above program in Greece.

References

  1. K. Kapiris, A. Tursi, Ch. Mytilineou, S. Kavadas, G. D'Onghia, and M. T. Spedicato, “Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus (Decapoda, Aristeidae) in the Greek Ionian Sea,” in Proceedings of the 36th Commission Internationale pour l'Exploration Scientifique de la mer Méditerranée Congress (CIESM '01), p. 280, Monaco, France, September 2001.
  2. C. Papaconstantinou and K. Kapiris, “Distribution and population structure of the red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) on an unexploited fishing ground in the Greek Ionian Sea,” Aquatic Living Resources, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 303–312, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Papaconstantinou and K. Kapiris, “The biology of the giant red shrimp (Aristaeomorpha foliacea) at an unexploited fishing ground in the Greek Ionian Sea,” Fisheries Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 37–51, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. F. Sardà, G. D'Onghia, C.-Y. Politou, J. B. Company, P. Maiorano, and K. Kapiris, “Deep-sea distribution, biological and ecological aspects of Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) in the western and central Mediterranean Sea,” Scientia Marina, vol. 68, supplement 3, pp. 117–127, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  5. C.-Y. Politou, K. Kapiris, P. Maiorano, F. Capezzuto, and J. Dokos, “Deep-sea Mediterranean biology: the case of Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Aristeidae),” Scientia Marina, vol. 68, supplement 3, pp. 129–139, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Demestre and J.-M. Fortuňo, “Reproduction of deep-water shrimp Aristeus antennatus (Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata),” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 84, pp. 41–51, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Mura, S. Campisi, and A. Cau, “Osservazioni sulla biologia riproduttiva neg-li aristeidi demersali del Mediterraneo Centro-Occidentale,” Oebalia, vol. 17, supplement 2, pp. 75–80, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Ragonese and M. L. Bianchini, “Size at sexual maturity in red shrimp females, Aristaeomorpha foliacea, from the Sicilian Channel (Mediterranean Sea),” Crustaceana, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Kapiris, C. Papaconstantinou, and M. Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, “Allometric growth of male secondary sexual characters of Aristeus antennatus and Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Decapoda: Aristeidae),” Journal of Crustacean Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 784–789, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. Kapiris and M. Thessalou-Legaki, “Sex-related variability of rostrum morphometry of Aristeus antennatus (Decapoda: Aristeidae) from the Ionian Sea (Eastern Mediterranean, Greece),” Hydrobiologia, vol. 449, pp. 123–130, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Kapiris and M. Thessalou-Legaki, “Comparative fecundity and oocyte size of Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus in the Greek Ionian Sea (E. Mediterranean) (Decapoda: Aristeidae),” Acta Zoologica, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 239–245, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. D. Levi and M. Vaccchi, “Macroscopic scale for simple and rapid determination of sexual maturity in Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1826) (Decapoda: Penaeidae),” Journal of Crustacean Biology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 532–538, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Relini-Orsi and G. Relini, “Pesca e riproduzione del gambero rosso Aristeus antennatus nel mare Ligure,” in Quaderni Civica Stazione Idrobiologia, vol. 7, pp. 39–62, Civica Stazione Idrobiologia, Milano, Italy, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. R. Gunderson, “Population biology of Pacific Ocean perch, Sebastes alutus, stocks in the Washington-Queen Charlotte Sound region, and their response to fishing,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 369–403, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  15. R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf, Biometry, W.H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  16. K. Kapiris, Biology and fishery of the deep water shrimps Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) and Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) (Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata), Ph.D. thesis, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2004.
  17. I. Arrobas and A. Ribeiro-Cascalho, “On the biology and fishery of Aristeus antennatus in the south Portuguese coast,” Investigación Pesquera, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 233–243, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Demestre, “Moult activity-related spawning success in the Mediterranean deep-water shrimp Aristeus antennatus (Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata),” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 127, no. 1–3, pp. 57–64, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Garcia-Rodriguez and A. Esteban, “On the biology and fishery of Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816), (Decapoda, Dendrobranchiata) in the Ibiza Channel (Balearic Islands, Spain),” Scientia Marina, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  20. G. D'Onghia, P. Maiorano, A. Matarrese, and A. Tursi, “Distribution, biology, and population dynamics of Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) (Decapoda, Natantia, Aristeidae) in the north-western Ionian Sea (Mediterranean Sea),” Crustaceana, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 518–544, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. Relini-Orsi, “Aspetti riproduttivi in Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) (Decapoda, Aristeidae),” Memoria della Biologia Marina e Oceanographis, vol. 10, supplement, pp. 285–289, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  22. L. Relini-Orsi and M. Pestarino, “Riproduzione e distribuzione di Aristeus antennatus sui fondi batiali Liguri, nota preliminare,” Quaderni di Laboratorio della Tecnologia di Pesca, vol. 3, supplement 1, pp. 123–133, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Carbonell, A. Grau, V. Lauronce, and C. Gómez, “Ovary development of the red shrimp, Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) from the northwestern Mediterranean Sea,” Crustaceana, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 727–743, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. H.-C. Kao, T.-Y. Chan, and H.-P. Yu, “Ovary development of the deep-water shrimp Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1826) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Aristeidae) from Taiwan,” Zoological Studies, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 373–378, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Ribeiro-Cascalho and I. Arrobas, “Aristeus antennatus: some considerations about its biology and fishery in Portuguese waters,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, C.M. 1982/K: 6: 1–21, 1982.
  26. G. D'Onghia, F. Capezzuto, Ch. Mytilineou et al., “Comparison of the population structure and dynamics of Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) between exploited and unexploited areas in the Mediterranean Sea,” Fisheries Research, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 22–38, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. M. Yahiaoui, “Distribution and reproduction cycle of Aristeus antennatus and Aristaeomorpha foliacea in Algeria,” in Life Cycles and Fisheries of the Deep-water Red Shrimps Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus. Proceedings of the International Workshop held in the Instituto di Tecnologia della Pesca e del Pescato, M. L. Bianchini and S. Ragonese, Eds., pp. 51–52, N.T.R. - I.T.P.P., Mazzara del Vallo, Italy, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Sardà and M. Demestre, “Estudio biologico de la gamba Aristeus antennatus en el Mar Catalan (NE de Espana),” Investigación Pesquera, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 213–232, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  29. W. H. Clark Jr., A. I. Yudin, F. J. Griffin, and K. Shigekawa, “The control of gamete activation and fertilization in the marine Penaeidae, Sicyonia ingentis,” in Advances in Invertebrate Reproduction, W. H. Engels Jr., A. Clark, P. J. W. Fischer, and D. F. Went, Eds., vol. 3, pp. 459–472, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  30. Anonymous, “Developing deep water fisheries: data for their assessment and for understanding their interaction with and impact on a fragile environment,” EC FAIR project CT 95-0655. Final Report of partner no. 6 (NCMR), 1999.
  31. M. Arculeo, G. Payen, A. Cuttitta, G. Galioto, and S. Riggio, “A survey of ovarian maturation in a population of Aristeus antennatus (Crustacea: Decapoda),” Animal Biology, vol. 4, pp. 13–18, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Greco, F. Perdichizzi, B. Spalletta, D. Capecchi, and D. Giordano, “Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus in Southern Tyrrhenian Sea,” in Life Cycles and Fisheries of the Deep-water Red Shrimps Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus. Proceedings of the International Workshop held in the Instituto di Tecnologia della Pesca e del Pescato, M. L. Bianchini and S. Ragonese, Eds., pp. 37–38, N.T.R. - I.T.P.P., Mazzara del Vallo, Italy, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Mori, F. Biagi, and S. De Ranieri, “Reproductive biology of Aristaeomorpha foliacea in the Southern Tuscany archipelago (Central Tyrrhenian Sea),” in Life Cycles and Fisheries of the Deep-water Red Shrimps Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus. Proceedings of the International Workshop held in the Instituto di Tecnologia della Pesca e del Pescato, M. L. Bianchini and S. Ragonese, Eds., pp. 31–32, N.T.R. - I.T.P.P., Mazzara del Vallo, Italy, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Demestre, Biologia pesquera de la gamba Aristeus antennatus en el Mar Catalan, Ph.D. thesis, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 1990.
  35. A. Campillo, “Bio-ecology of Aristeus antennatus in the French Mediterranean,” in Life Cycles and Fisheries of the Deep-water Red Shrimps Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus. Proceedings of the International Workshop held in the Instituto di Tecnologia della Pesca e del Pescato, M. L. Bianchini and S. Ragonese, Eds., vol. 3, pp. 25–26, N.T.R. - I.T.P.P., Mazzara del Vallo, Italy, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Cau, A. M. Deiana, and M. Mura, “Nuovi dati sull' accrescimento e sulla maturita sessuale di Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Decapoda, Penaeidae),” Naturalista Siciliano, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 429–434, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  37. P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, B. B. Manca, M. R. D'Alcala et al., “The Eastern Mediterranean in the 80s and in the 90s: the big transition in the intermediate and deep circulations,” Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, vol. 29, no. 2–4, pp. 365–395, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar