Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 571340 |

Peter N. Uchakin, David C. Parish, Francis C. Dane, Olga N. Uchakina, Allison P. Scheetz, Neal K. Agarwal, Betsy E. Smith, "Fatigue in Medical Residents Leads to Reactivation of Herpes Virus Latency", Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, vol. 2011, Article ID 571340, 7 pages, 2011.

Fatigue in Medical Residents Leads to Reactivation of Herpes Virus Latency

Academic Editor: Mary E. Marquart
Received19 Sep 2011
Accepted09 Nov 2011
Published20 Dec 2011


The main objective of this study was to detect fatigue-induced clinical symptoms of immune suppression in medical residents. Samples were collected from the subjects at rest, following the first night (low-stress), and the last night (high-stress) of night float. Computerized reaction tests, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Wellness Profile questionnaires were used to quantify fatigue level. DNA of human herpes viruses HSV-1, VZV, EBV, as well as cortisol and melatonin concentrations, were measured in saliva. Residents at the high-stress interval reported being sleepier compared to the rest interval. EBV DNA level increased significantly at both stress intervals, while VZV DNA level increased only at low-stress. DNA levels of HSV-1 decreased at low-stress but increased at high-stress. Combined assessment of the viral DNA showed significant effect of stress on herpes virus reactivation at both stress intervals. Cortisol concentrations at both stress intervals were significantly higher than those at rest.

1. Introduction

Fatigue is often associated with photoperiodic/circadian alterations due to sleep deprivation and may lead to the development of affective disorders, psychosomatic diseases, cancer, and other pathologies; alterations in immune and endocrine parameters have been demonstrated among various specialties [14]. Special consideration needs to be given to the group of specialties where fatigue is associated with the life-death decision making.

There are few groups of professionals who are subjected to the real-life stressors on a regular basis and whose action may cost lives. Physicians, especially those in training, typically work long hours and are often fatigued due to sleep deprivation; fatigue contributes to the human component of medical errors and, thus, jeopardizes patient safety [5]. Decrease in cognitive function was observed among Ob/Gyn residents and medical students after call [6].

Rollinson et al. demonstrated that visual memory capacity significantly declines in interns across night shift [7]. It is clear that fatigue can affect professional performance of residents. Lapse in concentration and fatigue were the two most common factors contributing to the increase in percutaneous injuries during extended work shifts [8]. Papp et al. found that only 16% of 149 residents from 5 US academic health centers scored within the “normal” range on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale while 84% scored in the range for which clinical intervention is indicated. Residents described multiple adverse effects of sleep loss and fatigue on learning professionalism and task performance [9]. Furthermore, in a prospective, nationwide survey of almost 3000 interns, Barger et al. demonstrated that every extended work shift increased the risk of a motor vehicle crash during the commute from work by 16.2 percent. The authors concluded that extended-duration work shifts, which have been sanctioned by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, pose safety hazards for interns [10]. This also poses a hazard for the public. To complicate the situation, current duty hours for surgical residents frequently exceed the proposed ACGME limits. Niederee et al. found that 87% of 1653 surgery residents reported more than 80 duty hours and 45% more than 100 hours per week. More than half of residents felt that their cognitive abilities had been impaired by fatigue [11]. West demonstrated association of fatigue and distress with self-perceived medical errors among medical residents [12].

The current model of homeostatic interactions suggests that the HPA axis, especially corticosteroids, is the primary driving force for stress-induced secondary immune deficiencies [13, 14]. Additionally, it was found that hydrocortisone and dexamethasone can reactivate the EBV genome in latently infected lymphoblastoid cells [15].

Conclusively, the body of evidence shows close interaction between those mediators in neuroendocrine-immune network and performance. Moreover, it validates the importance of the systemic analysis of those mediators in response to occupational stresses, which can be quantified objectively and subjectively. We hypothesized that stress response to complex cognitive and noncognitive stressors of the medical training are similar to other occupational stress factors and, as such, can be used as a model for other paradigms (e.g., military service, astronauts) where logistical limitations interfere with the adequate scientific and clinical assessment. The main objective of this study was to evaluate whether fatigue among medical residents is a significant stress factor that is able to affect performance, alter adrenal stress response, and lead to reactivation of the herpes viruses.

2. Methods

The experimental design was chosen to evaluate a range of markers of fatigue, including neuroendocrine response and in vivo immune state, in healthy humans subjected to fatigue due to sleep deprivation and circadian shifts.

2.1. Subjects

A total of 75 residents (45 men, 30 women) (mean age 31.55, SD 5.72 years) from the Mercer University School of Medicine (MUSM) Departments of Internal Medicine ( ), Pediatrics ( ), Surgery ( ), and Family Practice ( ) completed at least one session. Twenty residents (29%) were in their first year, 19 (28%) in second, 21 (30%) in third, 3 (4%) in fourth, and 6 (9%) were in their fifth; six did not respond.

Prospective subjects were asked to exclude themselves if they had HBV, HCV, or HIV infection, body organ transplant, known or suspected cancer, used recombinant cytokines, or systemic steroids. This protocol was approved by the MUSM Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment.

2.2. Sample Collection (Intervals and Procedure)

Residents completed the battery of tests at seven intervals: rest, night-float first night, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks, 30 hr overnight call start and end of the month, and after call. This paper focuses on three intervals for which saliva and computer values can be compared. For REST intervals, subjects felt rested and had at least 8 hours of sleep prior to testing; low stress—following first night of night float; high stress—following last night of night float. Samples were collected over 10 months to cover a range of fatigue levels during the various training programs.

2.3. Assessment of Fatigue

Residents completed a computerized battery of tests (E-Prime v.1.2., Psychology Tolls Inc., Pittsburgh, PA). The first was a driving simulation; for each shift, nine trials were performed in which reaction time and errors (e.g., brake-pedal push absent stop sign, failure to press for stop sign) were measured. Additionally, subjects completed questionnaires about the work shift, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and the Wellness Profile [16, 17].

2.4. Evaluation of Immune Status

Immediately after completion of the computer tests, subjects provided saliva samples into Salivettes (Sarstedt AG & Co., Newton, NC, USA) and placed them into a refrigerator. Following collection, samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 5 min, aliquoted, and frozen at −80°C for the measurement of viral DNA, cortisol, and melatonin.

Extraction of the viral DNA was performed with the QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) from the whole saliva according to the manufacturer recommendations. Presence of DNA for the Herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1), Varicella Zoster virus (VZV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was analyzed with the semiquantitative real-time PCR technique using SYBR Green chemistry. The following primers were used: HSV-1 (F: CTACAT GGACCCAGTTGTCG, R: CGGTGATTTATACCATGCCA); VZV (F: GCCTCATTTAACGGTTGGTT, R: TCGCGAACTACGTCTTCAAC), and EBV (F: CCGAAGATGAACAGCACAAT, R: TCATCGCTCTCTGGAATTTG). Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; NM_002046.3) and actin- (ACTB; NM_001101) were used as housekeeping genes for the endogenous control (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). All samples were batch-analyzed in duplicate after completion of the study. PCR products were detected on ABI 7300 real-time PCR analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

2.5. Assessment of the Endocrine Stress Response

Concentrations of cortisol and melatonin were assayed in the saliva with commercial ELISA kits (ALPCO Diagnostics, Salem, NH, USA) and read on the Multiscan MS Plate Reader (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland) according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. All samples were batch-analyzed in duplicate after completion of the study. Sensitivity of the ELISA kits for cortisol and melatonin was 1.0 ng/mL and 0.5 pg/mL, correspondingly.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were accomplished with SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Reliability of subjective assessments of fatigue was determined via Cronbach’s alpha [18]. Continuous measures were expressed as means ± SD and compared using mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) after determination that distributions confirmed to the requirements of normality and homogeneity. Categorical measures, for example, caffeine use, were expressed as percentages and compared across shifts using Fisher’s Exact Chi Square.

3. Results

3.1. Fatigue Assessment

Nineteen residents (14 men, 5 women) completed the procedure during rest and low-stress intervals. There were no effects for trial ( ), so mean performance across all nine trials was analyzed. Overall, men (823 ± 782 ms) did not have different reaction times than women (663 ± 1179 ms) and the rest (782 ± 634 ms) reaction time was only slightly ( ) faster than the low-stress shift reaction time (887 ± 631 ms). The Shift × Gender interaction was significant ( ); this interaction was produced by little shift difference for men (meanREST = 824 ± 723 ms; meanLOW = 782 ± 478 ms) while women were faster at rest (663 ± 170 ms) than at low-stress (1190 ± 950 ms). For errors, there was a marginally significant shift effect ( ); fewer errors were committed at rest (0.37 ± 1.01  /session) than at low-stress (1.26 ± 3.30  /session). Only 15 residents (10 men, 5 women) completed the procedure during both rest and high-stress. Mean reaction time did not differ between shifts nor between genders, nor did the number of errors differ.

The Epworth Sleep Scale evidenced adequate reliability on all three shifts ( = 0.91, = 0.86, = 0.88), as did the Wellness scale ( = 0.72, = 0.72, = 0.73); the summative score for each scale was therefore used for analysis. Residents reported feeling better ( ) at rest (25.00 ± 4.83) than low-stress (22.95 ± 4.98) and reported being much less sleepy ( ) at rest than low-stress. Furthermore, residents on the high-stress shift reported being sleepier ( ) than residents at rest interval but did not evidence any difference in Wellness scores (Figure 1). Caffeine use did not differ between any shifts.

3.2. Viral Load

Only 15 subjects provided sufficient sample volume to measure viral load for all three viruses at all three intervals. As the first step, log transformation of raw quantification data (RQ) of the viral DNA, which reflect relative changes in the viral load values, detected a Shift × Stress interaction ( ; Figure 2). EBV DNA level increased considerably under both low- (log = 2.21 ± 4.41) and high-stress (log = 0.75 ± 4.37) conditions, while VZV DNA level ( = 1.44 ± 3.97; = 0.33 ± 4.24) increased under stress but to a much lesser extent. DNA level of HSV actually decreased under low-stress (log = −0.77 ± 5.18) but increased under high-stress (log = 1.47 ± 3.70).

Additionally, for a more comprehensive analysis, actual viral loads were converted to a “Yes/No” response where more than 10-fold increase in viral load was considered as “Yes” response (viral reactivation), while all other (decrease and lower than 10-fold increase) results were considered as “No” response. Overall reactivation was significantly ( ) higher in both low- (0.38 ± 0.43) and high-stress (mean = 0.27 ± 0.4) than in rest (0.00). The three viruses did not differ ( ), and there was no significant interaction ( ).

Insofar as all 3 viruses have different tissue/organ tropism in the host, we combined the categorical results of all 3 by summing the “Yes” and “No” values across the three viruses (Table 1). Thus, a 3 represents a reactivation of all three viruses, a 2 or 1 represents reactivation of two or one of the viruses, respectively, and a 0 represents no reactivation. These values were analyzed via a 3 (stress) repeated measures ANOVA. The stress effect was significant ( ); the total number of reactivations at rest (0.26 ± 0.12) was significantly lower than at low- (1.6 ± 0.3) and high-stress (1.1 ± 0.3). The number of reactivations at low-stress was not significantly different from reactions at high-stress.


* *

3.3. Endocrine Response

Cortisol and melatonin values were analyzed only in 12 subjects for all three levels of stress. There was a significant stress effect ( ). Cortisol concentration at both low-stress and high-stress intervals was significantly higher compared to rest (Figure 2(d)). No significant difference was observed between low- and high-stress intervals. Additionally, cortisol levels at rest and high-stress interval were highly correlated ( = 0.78, ), but low-stress levels were not correlated with rest or with high-stress. No significant changes in saliva melatonin level were obtained.

4. Discussion

This research project was developed to evaluate the effects of complex stress factors on immune responsiveness, cognitive performance, and fatigue. Medical residency schedule is designed to prepare physicians to adapt to high-stake decision-making stress in real time. In this aspect, residency reflects other occupational stress environments such as active military duty, space exploration, and polar expedition. Chronic exposure to complex cognitive and noncognitive stressors can progress to distress, leads to general fatigue and has been shown to alter immune responsiveness and reactivation of the latent herpes viruses, and affects the subjects’ ability to perform their duty [1923].

In this study, we have detected reactivation of latent herpes viruses that suggests immune suppression. It is not clear if such suppression is generalized or affects specifically antiviral immunity.

As endocrine mediators of the (HPA) axis, glucocorticoids play a primarily suppressive role in regulating immune response [13]. Glucocorticoids affect the immune system by altering leukocyte trafficking and migration of various cell types to areas of inflammation and directly inhibit individual cellular functions [24]. These shifts in leukocyte subpopulations may represent a mechanism to avoid detrimental effects of stress or, alternatively, prepare the immune system for an encounter with antigens and pathogens [25].

As inflammatory mediators, glucocorticoids inhibit IL-12 production but increase IL-10 production by monocytes and T cells [26]. This drives the immune response towards a Treg cytokine “suppressive” profile and away from a Th1 profile (production of IL-12, IFN-γ) that supports cellular immunity essential for viral clearance and, thus, may predispose individuals to herpes virus reactivation [27]. While such viral reactivation was previously well demonstrated [2831], its underlying mechanisms in vivo are not completely understood. Stress, especially chronic “cortisol mediated” as opposed to acute “adrenalin mediated”, is one factor associated with reactivation, and there have been considerable speculation linking stress and the appearance, duration, and intensity of herpes virus infections [32]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that EBV-transformed B-lymphocytes express glucocorticoid receptors and that glucocorticoid hormones, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and corticotropin-releasing factor can reactivate latent EBV in vitro [33]. These observations may partially be explained by the recent identification of a glucocorticoid-response element in the BamHI-C fragment of the EBV genome [34]. That also can explain similarity in the pattern of the EBV reactivation with the cortisol saliva level in this study. Cortisol level peaks in the mornings at ~30–45 min after awakening [35, 36]. Samples from our subjects were collected at significantly latter time and often after sleepless nights. As such, it is safe to presume that our data reflect elevated averaged level of the cortisol and, thus, show that even small increase in the concentration of this hormone is able to alter immune responsiveness.

The current set of data does not provide direct explanation of different reactivation pattern among studied viruses. However, we can speculate that differences in the tissue tropism of the herpes viruses, their different sensitivity to endocrine mediators (e.g., cortisol, adrenalin, DHEA, and melatonin), and differences in the organ/tissue involvement in the general adaptation syndrome are significant factors that regulated observed herpes virus reactivation [37, 38].

While significant elevation in the viral load was observed, no clinical manifestations were reported by the participants and correlates with the observation of Cohrs et al. [39]. Individual perception of the stress factors by subjects needs to be considered. Residents are healthy young people who lead an active lifestyle, who realize the importance of a healthy lifestyle (including physical activity and nutrition), and who are very determined to achieve their goals. When the residents were asked whether or not they liked the night-float system, 87% ( ) responded “yes” and 13% ( ) responded “no”; 6 did not respond. Such factors may partially counteract the negative side effects of fatigue and sleep deprivation. However, available data confirms that fatigued health practitioners are more likely to make an error, as well as suggests that they are more prompt to develop clinical manifestation of the herpes virus reactivation (shingles, mononucleosis, etc.)

This study has objective limitations. First, busy schedules during this longitudinal protocol produced considerable data loss as many residents were able to complete data collection for only one or two shifts. This loss prevented comparisons among residency programs. Secondly, while saliva collection is a relatively simple procedure, inability to see sample levels and absence of supervision from trained personnel often lead to inadequate collection [40]. Despite the small numbers in the study, the correlates of stress are apparent.

5. Conclusions

Fatigue among residents and increased shedding of herpes virus DNA are the major findings of this study. Our subjects have daily close contact with patients in a tertiary care hospital and rotate between intensive care units, operating rooms, the emergency department, inpatient floors, and outpatient clinics. These patients often have a weakened immune system. Increased shedding of viruses by fatigue stressed residents contributes to an unfavorable epidemiological environment. The fact that viral shedding is not perceived by the residents as an illness episode may increase risk of transmission [41, 42]. Moreover, even subclinical reactivation of the latent virus and increase of the viral DNA level could be sufficient to stimulate secretion of the cytokines (e.g., as IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, IL-10, and TNF-α) with shown psychotropic (e.g., depression, suicidal thoughts) effects (reviewed in: [4345]). While most of the psychotropic effects were demonstrated for high pharmacological doses, individual response, especially under the stress environment, could be unique and unpredictable.

Further studies are needed to evaluate the underlying mechanisms of these findings and, ultimately, to develop countermeasures to protect both physicians and their patients.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.


Authors thank all medical residents who have participated in this study as subjects as well as testers for their effort and commitment. This work was supported in part by the Mercer University Seed Grant Program.


  1. D. F. Dinges, S. D. Douglas, S. Hamarman, L. Zaugg, and S. Kapoor, “Sleep deprivation and human immune function,” Advances in Neuroimmunology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Irwin, J. Mcclintick, C. Costlow, M. Fortner, J. White, and J. C. Gillin, “Partial night sleep deprivation reduces natural killer and cellular immune responses in humans,” FASEB Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 643–653, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. Magrini, A. Pietroiusti, L. Coppeta et al., “Shift work and autoimmune thyroid disorders,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 19, no. 4, supplement, pp. 31–36, 36. View at: Google Scholar
  4. H. Moldofsky, F. A. Lue, J. R. Davidson, and R. Gorczynski, “Effects of sleep deprivation on human immune functions,” FASEB Journal, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1972–1977, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. W. Lockley, L. K. Barger, N. T. Ayas, J. M. Rothschild, C. A. Czeisler, and C. P. Landrigan, “Effects of health care provider work hours and sleep deprivation on safety and performance,” Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, vol. 33, no. 11, supplement, pp. 7–18, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. M. Halbach, C. O. Spann, and G. Egan, “Effect of sleep deprivation on medical resident and student cognitive function: a prospective study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 1198–1201, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. C. Rollinson, N. K. Rathlev, M. Moss et al., “The effects of consecutive night shifts on neuropsychological performance of interns in the emergency department: a pilot study,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 400–406, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. T. Ayas, L. K. Barger, B. E. Cade et al., “Extended work duration and the risk of self-reported percutaneous injuries in interns,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 296, no. 9, pp. 1055–1062, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. K. Papp, E. P. Stoller, P. Sage et al., “The effects of sleep loss and fatigue on resident-physicians: a multi-institutional, mixed-method study,” Academic Medicine, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 394–406, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. K. Barger, B. E. Cade, N. T. Ayas et al., “Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among interns,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. J. Niederee, J. L. Knudtson, M. C. Byrnes et al., “A survey of residents and faculty regarding work hour limitations in surgical training programs,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 663–671, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. P. West, A. D. Tan, T. M. Habermann, J. A. Sloan, and T. D. Shanafelt, “Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 302, no. 12, pp. 1294–1300, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. I. J. Elenkov and G. P. Chrousos, “Stress hormones, proinflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokines, and autoimmunity,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 966, pp. 290–303, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. Z. Matalka, “Neuroendocrine and cytokines-induced responses to minutes, hours, and days of mental stress,” Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 283–292, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  15. R. Glaser, L. A. Kutz, R. C. MacCallum, and W. B. Malarkey, “Hormonal modulation of Epstein-Barr virus replication,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 356–361, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. C. Brown, P. J. Geiselman, A. L. Copeland, C. Gordon, and A. Richard-Eaglin, “Reliability and validity of the personal wellness profile (PWP) questionnaire in African American college women,” Journal of cultural diversity, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 163–167, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. S. Smith, T. P. Oei, J. A. Douglas, I. Brown, G. Jorgensen, and J. Andrews, “Confirmatory factor analysis of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea,” Sleep Medicine, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 739–744, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. J. Cronbach, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,” Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, 1951. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. E. Crucian, R. P. Stowe, S. K. Mehta et al., “Immune status, latent viral reactivation, and stress during long-duration head-down bed rest,” Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, vol. 80, no. 5, supplement, pp. A37–A44, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Glaser and J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, “Chronic stress modulates the virus-specific immune response to latent herpes simplex virus type 1,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 78–82, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. K. Mehta, B. Crucian, D. L. Pierson, C. Sams, and R. P. Stowe, “Monitoring immune system function and reactivation of latent viruses in the artificial gravity pilot study,” Journal of Gravitational Physiology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. P21–25, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. K. Mehta, D. L. Pierson, H. Cooley, R. Dubow, and D. Lugg, “Epstein-Barr virus reactivation associated with diminished cell-mediated immunity in antarctic expeditioners,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 235–240, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. N. Uchakin, B. Tobin, M. Cubbage, G. Marshall Jr., and C. Sams, “Immune responsiveness following academic stress in first-year medical students,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 687–694, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. S. Fauci, D. C. Dale, and J. E. Balow, “Glucocorticosteroid therapy: mechanisms of action and clinical considerations,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 304–315, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. S. Dhabhar, A. H. Miller, B. S. McEwen, and R. L. Spencer, “Effects of stress on immune cell distribution: dynamics and hormonal mechanisms,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 10, pp. 5511–5527, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  26. I. J. Elenkov, D. A. Papanicolaou, R. L. Wilder, and G. P. Chrousos, “Modulatory effects of glucocorticoids and catecholamines on human interleukin-12 and interleukin-10 production: clinical implications,” Proceedings of the Association of American Physicians, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 374–381, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  27. R. Glaser, J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, R. H. Bonneau, W. Malarkey, S. Kennedy, and J. Hughes, “Stress-induced modulation of the immune response to recombinant hepatitis B vaccine,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. K. Mehta, R. P. Stowe, A. H. Feiveson, S. K. Tyring, and D. L. Pierson, “Reactivation and shedding of cytomegalovirus in astronauts during spaceflight,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 1761–1764, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. P. Stowe, E. V. Kozlova, C. F. Sams, D. L. Pierson, and D. M. Walling, “Latent and lytic Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in the peripheral blood of astronauts,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1071–1077, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. P. Stowe, D. L. Pierson, D. L. Feeback, and A. D. Barrett, “Stress-induced reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus in astronauts,” NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 51–58, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  31. P. N. Uchakin, R. P. Stowe, D. Paddon-Jones, B. W. Tobin, A. A. Ferrando, and R. R. Wolfe, “Cytokine secretion and latent herpes virus reactivation with 28 days of horizontal hypokinesia,” Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 608–612, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. H. Blotta, R. H. DeKruyff, and D. T. Umetsu, “Corticosteroids inhibit IL-12 production in human monocytes and enhance their capacity to induce IL-4 synthesis in CD4+ lymphocytes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 158, no. 12, pp. 5589–5595, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. Glaser, G. R. Pearson, R. H. Bonneau, B. A. Esterling, C. Atkinson, and J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, “Stress and the memory T-Cell response to the Epstein-Barr virus in healthy medical students,” Health Psychology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 435–442, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  34. S. R. Kupfer and W. C. Summers, “Identification of a glucocorticoid-responsive element in Epstein-Barr virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1984–1990, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. E. Bower, P. A. Ganz, and N. Aziz, “Altered cortisol response to psychologic stress in breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 277–280, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. D. Roberts, S. Wessely, T. Chalder, A. Papadopoulos, and A. J. Cleare, “Salivary cortisol response to awakening in chronic fatigue syndrome,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 184, pp. 136–141, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. P. Stowe, D. L. Pierson, and A. D. Barrett, “Elevated stress hormone levels relate to Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in astronauts,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 891–895, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Szczepanik, “Melatonin and its influence on immune system,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 58, supplement 6, pp. 115–124, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  39. R. J. Cohrs, S. K. Mehta, D. S. Schmid, D. H. Gilden, and D. L. Pierson, “Asymptomatic reactivation and shed of infectious varicella zoster virus in astronauts,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1116–1122, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. K. Taylor, K. P. Sausen, E. G. Potterat et al., “Stressful military training: endocrine reactivity, performance, and psychological impact,” Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 1143–1149, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. A. Johnson, K. C. Bloch, and B. N. Dang, “Varicella reinfection in a seropositive physician following occupational exposure to localized zoster,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 907–909, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. Sakaoka, T. Aomori, T. Gouro, and Y. Kumamoto, “Demonstration of either endogenous recurrence or exogenous reinfection by restriction endonuclease cleavage analysis of herpes simplex virus from patients with recrudescent genital herpes simplex virus from patients with recrudescent genital herpes,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 387–396, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. Y. Dowlati, N. Herrmann, W. Swardfager et al., “A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 446–457, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. H. Miller, V. Maletic, and C. L. Raison, “Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 732–741, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Wichers and M. Maes, “The psychoneuroimmuno-pathophysiology of cytokine-induced depression in humans,” International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 375–388, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Peter N. Uchakin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.