Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 968031 |

Moustafa El-Shenawy, Mohamed El-Shenawy, Jordi Mañes, Jose M. Soriano, "Listeria spp. in Street-Vended Ready-to-Eat Foods", Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, vol. 2011, Article ID 968031, 6 pages, 2011.

Listeria spp. in Street-Vended Ready-to-Eat Foods

Academic Editor: Ashrafus Safa
Received09 Sep 2011
Accepted11 Nov 2011
Published12 Dec 2011


Street-vended ready-to-eat food sold in Egypt, including sandwiches and dishes of traditional food, was examined for the presence of Listeria species. Out of 576 samples, 24% were found to contain Listeria species. L. monocytogenes and L. innocua were isolated from 57% and 39% of the contaminated samples, respectively. Other Listeria spp. were detected with lower frequency. L. monocytogenes of ≥103 CFU/g were detected in 7% of the total examined samples, which represent 49% of the contaminated food samples (meat, poultry, seafood, dairy products, and products of plant origin). Most of the samples contaminated by L. monocytogenes had high levels of total viable bacterial counts. The results obtained may help to clarify the epidemiology of listeriosis in the country and draw the attention of the decision makers to issue hygienic regulations for food processing industries as well as street vendors in order to ensure safe street-vended ready-to-eat food.

1. Introduction

In Egypt, people eat foods that include sandwiches and variety of hot dishes which are mostly sold by street vendors. Street vendors, in Egypt, usually have small mobile carts with cabinets manufactured from wood, and sometimes covered with glass, to protect their foods from the environmental contamination. They always use utensils manufactured from aluminum, stainless steel, and plastic to prepare and serve their foods. Vendors sell sandwiches prepared from ready-to-eat fillings such as luncheon (processed, repacked meat/chicken often molded into a loaf and served sliced), basturma (air-dried seasoned beef), salmon, tuna, hard cheese (Romy), white soft cheese (Damietta), processed cheese, and cream-based sandwiches in addition to ice cream. Other fillings are prepared in streets by boiling or frying meat products, seafood, poultry, eggs, fuol medames (overnight boiled faba beans), falafel (fried paste of faba beans, green vegetables, onion, garlic, and other spices) as well as koshary dishes, which consist of rice, macaroni, black lentil, and fried onion.

The hot climate and the environmental conditions such as the dusty streets, in which these vendors are working, favor bacterial growth, and there may be uncertainty about which food item is finally served to the consumer. Furthermore, the lack of refrigeration facilities, sources of running water, personal hygiene, and public toilets may increase the chances for cross-contamination.

The cross-contamination of such foods with pathogenic microorganisms could occur during the processing of ready fillings as well as during the preparation of fillings and sandwiches, in vendor’s homes and cars [16].

Until now, only one study, in Egypt, on the assessment of foodborne pathogens in street-vended ready-to-eat foods has been done [7]. El-Sherbeeny and his colleagues [7] examined 114 samples, which were collected from the mobile carts over a period of 3 years, to find bacterial contamination; their study revealed that 41%, 37%, 26%, and 3% of the samples were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Clostridum perfringens, and Shigella, respectively. Notably, in none of the samples, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Salmonella—two well-known foodborne pathogens—were detected. However, the presence of Listeria spp. has never been investigated in these kinds of food.

The bacterium Listeria is widely distributed in our environment. Its most important species is Listeria monocytogenes that has been long recognized as the cause of a serious human disease, known as listeriosis [8]. Clinical manifestations of this disease include abortion, meningoencephalitis, and septicaemia in immunocompromised individuals [911]. Listeriosis can be resulting from the consumption of L. monocytogens contaminated foods such as meat, poultry, dairy products, seafood, and other types of food. Street-vended foods can be easily contaminated with this pathogen as the organism is widespread in nature and can overlap the environmental conditions [1218]. The infectious dose of L. monocytogens can vary depending on several factors, of which the immune status of the individual and the virulence of the strain ingested are among the most important [11]. Currently, there is a lack of information on the occurrence of foodborne diseases in Egypt. The reported cases done by the Department of Infectious Diseases in the Ministry of Health do not reflect the actual occurrence of foodborne diseases in Egypt, since notification is required only when five or more cases are reported by either one physician or one medical institution (personal communication). Thus, the foodborne transmission of infectious diseases and their causative agents remain unknown in most cases.

In view of the open and unhygienic environmental conditions, in which street-vended foods are prepared and handled, contamination of these foods with Listeria spp., including L. monocytogenes, seems likely. However, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes and the epidemiology of the other Listeria spp. in these foods are not known. Thus, work was undertaken to assess the extent to which ready-to-eat foods sold by street vendors could expose consumers to L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling

The prepared sandwiches and dishes were purchased from the mobile carts in the city of Alexandria. Additionally, other types of food such as shawarma (similar to kebab), chicken, shrimp and wrapped ice cream were purchased from the fixed carts, which were associated with a variety of small shops and restaurants. All samples were aseptically transferred into plastic bags, and the bags were maintained inside ice boxes (6–8°C) during transportation to the laboratory. The plastic bags containing food samples were classified into five groups, according to their major components other than bread (Table 1). All samples were processed within 4 h of collection.

Food group(s)Food item(s)aNo. of samples containing listeria spp. (%)No. of samples containing L. monocytogens (%)Prevalence of L. monocytogens in Listeria spp. (expressed in %)

Meat productsShawarma b(1)8 (33)<4>5 (21)63
Luncheon(1)6 (25)3 (12)50
Basturma(1)3 (13)2 (8)66
Liver4 (17)2 (8)50
Sausage9 (38)<4>5 (21)56
Minced meat10 (42)<5>6 (25)60
Subtotal40 (28)23 (16)58

Poultry productsChicken7 (29)<4>4 (17)57
Luncheon6 (25)4 (17)66
Shawarma5 (21)3 (12)60
Boiled eggs2 (8)0 (0)0
Fried eggs3 (13)0 (0)0
Subtotal23 (19)11 (9)48

Seafood productsShrimp(1)8 (33)<5>5 (21)63
Fried fish4 (17)0 (0)0
Sepia7 (29)5 (21)71
Salmon0 (0)0 (0)0
Tuna0 (0)0 (0)0
Subtotal19 (16)10 (8)53

Dairy productsHard cheese(1)9 (38)<3>6 (25)67
White soft cheese7 (29)<1>5 (21)71%
Processed cheese0 (0)0 (0)0
Cream and Honey9 (38)6 (25)67%
Ice cream2 (8)0 (0)0
Subtotal27 (23)17 (14)63

Plant productsFul Medames3 (13)0 (0)0
Falafel5 (21)3 (12)60
Koshary(2)20 (83)<12>14 (58)70
Subtotal28 (39)17 (24)61

Grand total137 (24)78 (14)38

aTotal 24 samples from each food item were examined.
b( )Number of samples positive for the presence of Listeria spp. only after enrichment.
< >Number of samples containing L. monocytogens of ≥103 CFU/g.
2.2. Microbiological Analysis

Constituents of each food sample were mixed well, using sterile porcelain horn manually, in their plastic bag. Then, 25 g of each sample was aseptically weighed using sterile spatula and blended for 1 min with 225 mL of buffered peptone water in a sterile stainless steel blender cap [14]. The homogenate was transferred to a sterile bottle jar and was incubated at 30°C for 24 h. Ten mL of the incubated homogenate was added to 90 mL of Listeria Selective Broth (Oxoid) and further incubated for 48 h at 30°C. Thereafter, the homogenate was streaked onto two plates of Oxford agar (Oxoid), incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Grey colonies surrounded by black zones were presumed to be Listeria.

For determination of Listeria counts using the direct method [10], the original homogenates were decimally diluted using peptone water, and 0.1 mL of the appropriate dilutions were spread onto duplicate plates of Oxford agar and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Grey colonies surrounded by black zones were counted. For determination of total viable counts (TVCs), 1 mL portions of suitable dilution of the original homogenates were pouring plated in duplicate using total plate count agar (Difco). Plates were incubated at 30°C for 72 h. All bacterial counts were recorded as CFU/g.

2.3. Identification of Isolates

At most, five presumptive Listeria colonies were picked from each selective agar plate. These colonies were purified using Trypticase soy agar (Difco) and submitted to the Henry illumination test [19]. A pure culture of L. monocytogenes V7 strain serotype 1 (milk isolate), obtained from the Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA served as a control. Nonspore forming Gram-positive coccobacilli (single and/or in chains) isolates were tested for catalase and umbrella growth in Motility test medium (Difco) at 25°C. Isolates positive for both the tests were further examined for hemolysin production using Tryptose agar (Oxoid) with 5% sheep blood (obtained from Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University). The isolates were streaked onto Tryptose Agar (TA) slants, incubated at 35°C for 24 h, and then they were identified at the species level using the criteria of McLauchlin [2] as described by Bell [20]. The isolates were tested for fermentation of rhamnose, xylose and mannitol, CAMP test (synergistic lysis of red blood cells) against S. aureus ATCC 25923, and API Listeria. Moreover, the isolates from TA plates were confirmed by slide agglutination using polyvalent Listeria O antiserum (Difco).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed by means of the chi-square analysis (SAS, [21]) to determine the relationship between the type of the food groups and the presence of either Listeria spp. or L. monocytogenes.

3. Results and Discussion

In this study, a total of 576 samples (24 samples from each of the 24 food items belong to five major food groups) were examined. The results were summarized in Table 1. Listeria spp. were detected in all the five food groups. They were recovered from 24% (137 samples) of the total examined samples. Using the direct count technique, seven samples were found to be negative for the presence of Listeria spp., but were found positive after enrichment. Out of the 137 Listeria spp. contaminated samples, 78 samples were found to be contaminated with L. monocytogenes and 54 samples harboured L. innocua, however L. seeligeri and L. welshimeri were detected in two samples each. The Listeria species isolated from the remained one food sample could not be identified. Among the 78 L. monocytogenes contaminated samples, 22, 18, 14, 9, 7, and 8 samples were found to harbor the pathogen in levels of <200, 200–<103, ≥103-104, >104-105, >105-106, and >106 CFU/g, respectively. The levels of the total viable counts in relation to levels of contamination by L. monocytogenes are illustrated in Table 2.

Levels of the total viable counts/gm<104>104-105>105-106>106

Total examined samples (576 food samples).120192144120
Total samples containing L. monocytogens (78 food samples)6192429
Samples containing levels < 103 CFU/g L. monocytogens (40 food samples).3101215
Samples containing levels ≥ 103 CFU/g L. monocytogens (38 food samples).391214

*TVC: Total Viable Count.

The statistical analysis revealed that there is a relationship between the type of food groups and the presence of either Listeria spp. or L. monocytogenes ( ). In the meat products group, isolation of L. monocytogenes was higher in sandwiches of minced meat (25%), sausage (21%), and shawarma (21%) than the other type of sandwiches (Table 1). In this group, there was a relationship between the type of sandwiches and the isolation rate of the pathogens ( ). The same was true with the poultry products, where chicken (17%), luncheon (17%), and shawarma (12%) recorded the highest contamination ( ). In the seafood products group, higher prevalence of L. monocytogenes was detected in sandwiches of shrimp (21%) and Sepia (21%). In dairy products group, there was no relationship between the type of sandwiches and the presence of L. monocytogenes ( ), although the pathogen was isolated from 25%, 25%, and 21% of sandwiches of hard cheese, cream with honey, and white soft cheese, respectively. In plant products group, there was a relationship between the type of the examined food products and the presence of the pathogen ( ), in which higher prevalence of L. monocytogenes was detected in koshary dishes (38%) and falafel (12%). In fact, there are many combined conditions and factors that affect the presence/survival and growth of the bacterium in the food products [20]; therefore, it is difficult to explain the observed relationship between the food groups and the food type/items.

Overall, the results obtained, in this study, are similar to the findings by other authors [6, 11, 2226]. Depending on the food group, 8 to 24% of the investigated samples were found to harbor the pathogen (Table 1). Our findings are consistent with the results obtained by Cabedo et al. [26], who found L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods at a range of 6.2% to 20.0%, depending on the food products.

Notably, seven samples were found negative for the presence of Listeria spp. by direct count technique. However, the same samples appeared as positive for the bacterium by following an enrichment procedure prior to the direct count technique. In this regard, Wilson [13] mentioned that it is likely that poor cooling temperature is the major factor in the continued occurrence of Listeria spp. in products when the organisms are detected by direct count. Thus, in our results, the fact that the most Listeria-positive samples (130 out of 137) detected by direct plating might be indicative of temperature abuse, as may be expect from street vending facilities in Egypt with no or limited refrigeration capabilities.

Our results indicated that L. monocytogenes and L. innocua were the most commonly recovered species, although other species were also detected, but in lower frequency. In the United Kingdom, L. monocytogenes was found to be more common in variety of ready-to-eat foods than other kinds of food [12]. However, in another study, both L. monocytogenes and L. innocua were the only species isolated in prepared retail sandwiches [13]. In the same country, a comprehensive survey of ready-to-eat foods by Wilson [27] found that most of the Listeria spp. isolated was L. monocytogenes (49%) and L. innocua (36%) and other species were found at lower levels. By contrast, a high prevalence of Listeria spp. other than L. monocytogenes and L. innocua was detected in ready-to-eat foods at the Belgian market [28]. Although our results are similar to those of the United Kingdom, the differences in the data related to occurrence and distribution of the genus Listeria might be explained by the geographical/environmental specificity [29]. L. monocytogenes was also found to be more prevalent than L. innocua in food products in warm/hot countries, such as Brazil [30], India [31], and Mexico [32].

Concerning the permissible limits of L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods, in the United Kingdom and the European Union, the upper limit now is <100 CFU/g (testing at the end of shelf life) in products at the market [33]. However, the United States adopted a zero tolerance for the presence of L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat products [34]. More older, the British PHLS criteria [35] suggested that food containing 102 to 103 CFU/g, which indicates a nonsignificant failure of hygienic standards in the preparation and/or storage of such foods, should be considered unsatisfactory. However, those contaminated with ≥103 CFU/g, which indicate a significant failure of hygienic standards in the preparation and/or storage of such foods, should be considered potentially hazardous. According to these provisional guidelines, in this study, potentially hazardous level of L. monocytogenes (≥103 CFU/g) was found in 38 sandwiches/dishes, which represent about 7% of the total samples and 49% of the samples contaminated by Listeria spp. Additionally, this hazardous level of L. monocytogenes was also found in samples from all the food groups (Table 1). Such sandwiches/dishes represent a significant risk of exposure to consumers, especially koshary dishes, which are popularly consumed.

Detectable levels of L. monocytogenes (102-103) were found in 18 food products which represented about 3% of the total examined samples and 23% of the contaminated samples. At the same time, 4% of the total samples and 28% of the contaminated samples had L. monocytogenes counts less than 200 CFU/g.

An association between the presence of L. monocytogenes and high TVCs (>104) is evident from Table 2. The data show that only 6 samples, representing 5% (6 out 120 samples) of the total samples that had TVCs of <104, were found to be contaminated with L. monocytogenes. However, in samples that had TVCs > 104 CFU/g, this percentage has increased to 16% (72 out of 456 samples). The same was true between high TVCs and the presence of higher levels of L. monocytogenes (potentially hazardous) since 35 out of 38 samples which had ≥103 CFU/g L. monocytogenes had also TVCs > 104 CFU/g (Table 2). Although the present work clearly indicated that there was an association between high TVCs and the presence of the pathogen, it is unsafe to assume that there are no exceptions to this trend, since 6 sandwiches having TVCs < 104 CFU/g harbored the pathogen (Table 3). Such association may be due to poor hygiene during filling manufacturing, postprocess environmental contamination after cooking, and/or poor personal hygiene of the vendors themselves. Moreover, bread [27] and some other food ingredients commonly used in the preparation of sandwiches such as butter and margarine [13] may be also a source of contamination.

The inefficient handling of already manufactured fillings and/or fillings prepared by the vendors themselves in the streets may represent an important source of contamination, since sandwiches made from canned fillings such as salmon and tuna were free from the pathogen. Food items, such as processed cheese, foul medames, fried eggs, and ice cream, which were exposed to high temperatures during cooking/processing, had a lower positive rate (Table 1).

Another serious reason of cross-contamination is that street vendors usually wash the utensils and dishes, used for preparation and serving their food, in buckets containing stagnant water which remains unchanged for the whole selling period and also exposed to the dust in the streets. Another important factor is that those vendors do not have facilities to keep fillings/foods at controlled low temperature. They store the unsold at room temperature at their home and sell those foods in the next day (personal communication with some vendors); such acts certainly favor bacterial growth in either raw or cooked fillings.

In conclusion, this work gives an indication about the presence of Listeria spp. in ready-to-eat foods sold in streets. The levels of contamination should be interpreted with caution since there are many factors that may affect these findings. These factors include the quantity of filling(s) found in each sandwich, the filling(s)/bread ratio, sandwich(s)/koshary dishes ratio, and the environmental condition of the streets where the food products were vended. Our results showed that the consumption of such contaminated street-vended ready-to-eat foods pose a serious to the public health. Results from this study will certainly help to clarify the epidemiology of foodborne diseases in Egypt so that proper methods/actions can be taken to prevent and control outbreaks. It may also be useful in the development of microbiological guidelines. We believe that hygienic regulations should be issued for these street vendors, since most of them are not inspected by the concern authorities. On the other hand, careful handling/preparing, washing, cleaning of foods, and above all personal hygiene awareness would help to minimize or prevent contamination by such bacteria.


Financial support for this research was partly provided by the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (A/019106/08 and A/025113/09).


  1. M. A. El-Shenawy, “Sources of Listeria spp. in domestic food processing environment,” International Journal of Environmental Health Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 241–251, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. McLauchlin, “Listeria monocytogenes, recent advances in the taxonomy and epidemiology of listeriosis in humans,” Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. P. Oliver, B. M. Jayarao, and R. A. Almeida, “Foodborne pathogens in milk and the dairy farm environment: food safety and public health implications,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 115–129, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Soriano, H. Rico, J. C. Moltó, and J. Mañes, “Listeria species in raw and ready-to-eat foods from restaurants,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 551–553, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  5. FAO/WHO, “Risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods,” Microbiological Risk Assessment Series Technical Report 5, FAO/WHO, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. L. Little, R. Omotoye, and R. T. Mitchell, “The microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods with added spices,” International Journal of Environmental Health Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. R. El-Sherbeeny, M. Fahmi Saddik, and F. L. Bryan, “Microbiological profiles of foods served by street vendors in Egypt,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 355–364, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. L. Gray and A. H. Killinger, “Listeria monocytogenes and listeric infections,” Bacteriological Reviews, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 309–382, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Listeria monocytogenes. Recommendations by the National Advisory. Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 14, pp. 185–246, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. A. El-Shenawy and E. H. Marth, “Listeria monocytogenes and foods: history, characteristics, implication, isolation methods and control: a review,” Egyptian Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 17, pp. 1–18, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. M. Farber and P. I. Peterkin, “Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 476–511, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  12. R. J. Gilbert, J. McLauchlin, and S. K. Velani, “The contamination of pate by Listeria monocytogenes in England and Wales in 1989 and 1990,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 543–551, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  13. I. G. Wilson, “Occurrence of Listeria species in prepacked retail sandwiches,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 89–93, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. A. El-Shenawy and M. A. El-Shenawy, “Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in seafood enhanced by prolonged cold enrichment,” Journal of the Medical Research Institute, vol. 16, pp. 32–40, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. A. El-Shenawy and M. A. El-Shenawy, “Listeria species in some aquatic environments in Alexandria, Egypt,” International Journal of Environmental Health Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 130–140, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  16. C. S. Rivera, D. Blanco, R. Oria, and M. E. Venturini, “Diversity of culturable microorganisms and occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in Tuber aestivum and Tuber melanosporum ascocarps,” Food Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 286–293, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Tasara and R. Stephan, “Cold stress tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes: a review of molecular adaptive mechanisms and food safety implications,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1473–1484, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  18. E. Franz, S. O. Tromp, H. Rijgersberg, and H. J. Van Der Fels-Klerx, “Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes in leafy green vegetables consumed at salad bars,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 274–285, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  19. International Dairy Federation, “Detection of Listeria monocytogenes,” IDF Standard, vol. 143, pp. 1–8, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. Bell, “Listeria monocytogenes,” in Foodborne Pathogens: Hazards, Risk Analysis and Control, C. W. Blackburn and P. J. McClure, Eds., pp. 337–358, Woodhead Publishing, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  21. Statistical Analysis System, SAS / STAT User's Guide Release 8.12 edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 2002.
  22. R. M. Dillon and T. R. Patel, “Listeria in seafoods: a review,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 12, pp. 1009–1015, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  23. D. Roberts, “Listeria monocytogenes and food: the U.K. approach,” Dairy and Food Environ Sanitation, vol. 14, pp. 202–204, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  24. A. P. MacGowan, “The occurrence and seasonal changes in the isolation of Listeria spp. in shop bought food stuffs, human faeces, sewage and soil from urban sources,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 325–334, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. M. Lawrence and A. Gilmour, “Incidence of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in a poultry processing environment and in poultry products and their rapid confirmation by multiplex PCR,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 4600–4604, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  26. L. Cabedo, L. Picart I Barrot, and A. Teixidó I Canelles, “Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella in ready-to-eat food in Catalonia, Spain,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 855–859, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  27. I. G. Wilson, “Occurrence of Listeria species in ready to eat foods,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 519–526, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  28. E. Van Coillie, H. Werbrouck, M. Heyndrickx, L. Herman, and N. Rijpens, “Prevalence and typing of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat food products on the Belgian market,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2480–2487, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  29. W. M. Abrahão, P. R. D. S. Abrahão, C. L. B. Monteiro, and R. Pontarolo, “Occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in cheese and ice cream produced in the State of Paraná, Brazil,” Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Farmaceuticas, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 289–296, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. N. Miyasaki, E. Chiarini, A. D.S. Santana, M. T. Destro, M. Landgraf, and B. D. Franco, “High prevalence, low counts and uncommon serotypes of Listeria monocytogenes in linguiça, a Brazilian fresh pork sausage,” Meat Science, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 523–527, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. R. Kalorey, S. R. Warke, N. V. Kurkure, D. B. Rawool, and S. B. Barbuddhe, “Listeria species in bovine raw milk: a large survey of Central India,” Food Control, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 109–112, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. S. Carlos, R. S. Oscar, and Q. R. E. Irma, “Occurrence of Listeria species in raw milk in farms on the outskirts of Mexico city,” Food Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 177–181, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. “Commission Regulations (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs,” Official Journal, vol. 338, pp. 1–26, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  34. J. Pichler, G. Appl, A. Pietzka, and F. Allerberger, “Lessons to be learned from an outbreak of food-borne listeriosis, Austria 2009-2010,” Food Protection Trends, vol. 31, pp. 268–273, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  35. PHLS, “Provisional microbiological guidelines for some ready-to-eat foods sampled at point of sale: notes for PHLS examiners,” PHLS Microbiology Digest, vol. 9, pp. 98–99, 1992. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Moustafa El-Shenawy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.