Review Article
Measuring the Possibility of Middle Ear Discharge for COVID-19 Test Material
Table 1
Profile of methods for diagnosis of COVID-19.
| Methods | Advantage (s) | Disadvantage (s) | Classification according to speed for obtaining the result |
| Nucleic acid-based | RT-LAMP | Easy and simple to operate and high sensitivity and specificity | More risk of false positive or negative results | 1 | RMT | Easy to operate and cost-effective | Sensitivity lower than RT-PCR | 2 | RT-PCR | The gold standard for diagnosis of COVID-19 and high sensitivity and specificity | Not only live virus could be detected but also part of the virus | 3 | dPCR | Performs better than RT-PCR | High cost | 4 | mNGS | The best methods for detection of the pathogen genome | Detected genome is limited and may contain nonspecific genome sequences | 5 | Serological-based | LFIA | Simple and low cost | Low sensitivity | 2 | GICA | Simple and easy to do the test | High false positive | 1 | CLIA | High sensitivity and specificity | High false positive | 3 | ELISA | High sensitivity and specificity | Possibility of contamination | 4 | Antigen-based | | Simple and quick | Less sensitive than RT-PCR | | CT imaging-assisted | | Specific finding: ground-glass opacity and consolidation | Not used for determining diagnosis of COVID-19 | |
|
|