Table of Contents
ISRN Hematology
Volume聽2011聽(2011), Article ID聽810708, 7 pages
Clinical Study

Changing Patterns in the Clinical Pathological Features of Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report from Debrecen, Hungary

3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Internal Medicine, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary

Received 20 August 2011; Accepted 12 September 2011

Academic Editors: A.聽Bosly and O.聽Reman

Copyright 漏 2011 Zsófia Miltényi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Introduction. Hodgkin lymphoma shows a well-known geographic pattern, but temporal changes have been found recently as well. Patients and Methods. 439 Hodgkin lymphoma patients' clinicopathological and treatment data were processed in calendar periods of approximately ten years. The patients were treated at our department from 1980 until the end of 2008. Results. The first period (1980–89) contained 177 patients, the second (1990–99) 147, and the third (2000–08) 115 Hodgkin lymphoma patients. The mean age of the patients was 40.1, 35.9, and 36.8 years in order. The male/female ratio: 1.42, 1.45, 1.05 in order. Contrary-wise a unimodal age group pattern could have been seen with an incidence peak between 30 and 39 in the past decades. The incidence of classical mixed cellularity histological subtype is decreasing (43.7%, 58.23%, 42.6%, 饾憙 = 0 . 0 0 9 8 (it is only significant in the second period)); classical nodular sclerosis shows an increasing tendency (25%, 27.32%, 34.78%, 饾憙 = 0 . 1 7 3 4 ). The first incidence peak is predominantly created by classical nodular sclerosis, meanwhile the second peak by classical mixed cellularity. The number of early-stage patients (59.12%) is beyond the advanced stage (40%) in the last decade. Meanwhile, the number of second-stage patients was increasing (25.8%, 26.35%, 49.56%   饾憙 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 ) and of patients in third stage was decreasing (53.4 %, 50.67%, 20%   饾憙 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 ). The 5- and 10-year overall survival data were progressing: 59.7 %, 77.4 %, and 90.5 % and 44.1 %, 70.6 % and 90.5 % (expected survival) in the last decade. Conclusions. Changes can be explained by the altered nature of Hodgkin lymphoma, the changes in socioeconomic status and the development of diagnostic and therapy methods.

1. Introduction

Our knowledge about Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is flaring apace. Nowadays it is obvious that the disease can be divided into two groups by its pathogenesis and clinical features: the nodular lymphocyte predominant (NLP) and the classic subtypes.

Due to the development of diagnostics and the prognosis-based risk-adopted treatment strategies, more than 90% of patients get into complete remission in the developed countries. The exact etiology of the disease is still unknown, however, is not uniform since genetic features, viral infections, and other factors such as different lifestyle habits can contribute to the development of the disease. The role of the Epstein-Barr virus is obvious. The so-called “two-disease hypothesis” [1], which proposes that the HL seen in the younger group is infectious in nature whereas that in the older persons has causes similar to other types of lymphomas. The incidence of HL shows differences worldwide, it is more frequent in developed countries, most common in North America, and less frequent in Asia [2]. Data from mid-1990s reported an increasing prevalence among young adults in developing countries and stagnant incidence in western countries [3]. In the USA from 1974 to 1996, the incidence of the disease was stagnant among white females, only decreased among white males; meanwhile, a definite increase of incidence can be found among black females. Until 1985 an increase after dropping can be found among black males [4]. As compared to the incidence of HL in the European Union in 2002 (males: 2.5/100000, females: 1.9/100000), in Hungary the disease is less frequent among males while is minimally more frequent among females (males: 2.1/100000, females: 2.1/100000). Among the twenty-five countries of the European Union (data not known in Romania and Bulgaria), Hungary is ranked the sixth place in the incidence of the disease among females and the twenty-second place among males [5]. In 2002 worldwide, the HL was the most frequent among males in Yemen, the less frequent in Egypt, and, additionally, less frequent than the average in Hungary [5].

Earlier epidemiological studies have revealed three patterns of the distribution in HL. Pattern 1, seen in developing countries and in patients of low socioeconomic status, shows an early childhood peak and a second peak around the age of fifty, with tumors predominantly of classical mixed cellularity (cMC) and classical lymphocyte depletion (cLD) subtypes with EBV positivity. Pattern 3, seen in developed countries and in patients of high socioeconomic status, shows a bimodal age group pattern with a peak incidence among young adults with tumors mainly of classical nodular sclerosis (cNS) subtype with EBV negativity. Pattern 2, seen in countries with transitional economies, has an early childhood peak and a second (female) decade peak with equal frequencies of the cMC and cNS subtypes [1, 2].

Considering the socioeconomic changes in Hungary, the authors regarded them as worthwhile to investigate, whether the pathological or clinical nature and the treat worth of HL have changed in the past decades.

2. Patients and Methods

The clinical data of 439 HL patients treated at the University of Debrecen, Medical and Health Science Center, Institute for Internal Medicine, 3rd Department of Medicine from 01/01/1980 until the 12/31/2008 were processed in a division of calendar periods of approximately ten years (first period: 1980–1989, second period: 1990–1999, third period: 2000–2008).

Identification of histological subtypes was done according to Rye’s classification [6], recently according to REAL/WHO classification [7]. Clinical staging was done according to the Ann Arbor Classification [8] and later with its Cotswold’s modification [9]. The prognosis of the patients was given according to the EORTC recommendation [10] in early stage. In case of advanced-stage patients, prognosis was given according to the International Prognostic Index by Hasenclever and Diehl [11]. In advanced-stage disease, we considered the prognosis to be favourable, when the IPS value was 0–3, and unfavourable if it was at least 4.

The therapy of the patients occurred due to the current therapeutic protocols (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or combined radio- and chemotherapy). Primary polychemotherapy was dominantly CV(O)PP (cyclophosphamide, vinblastine (vincristine), procarbazine, prednisone) until 1991, then COPP/ABV (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone/adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine) from 1991, recently ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) from 1999. Salvage protocols were mainly BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone), DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabin, cisplatin), and CEP (CCNU, etoposide, chlorambucil, prednisone). The irradiation consisted of extended-field, mantle-field, converse Y, (sub)total nodal- or involved-field radiotherapy—initially with telecobalt machine, then from 2000 with linear accelerator. High-dose treatment and autolog hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were also accessible for treating relapsed or primary resistant patients from the 1990s [12].

Survival data were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method by SPSS15 computer software. For the statistical analyses the chi2 test was used. 饾憙 < 0 . 0 5 was considered significant.

3. Results

A total of 439 HL patients were treated primarily during the investigated period of 29 years. Male- to female-ratio decreased to 1.05 recently, instead of male predominance until now. The mean and median age was decreasing (Table 1).

Table 1: The features of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients during the investigated period.

Investigating the age of the patients, the age group pattern of the first period is unimodal, with one incidence peak between 30 and 39 years of age. We found a bimodal age group pattern in the second and third periods. The first incidence peak of this pattern can be found between 20 and 29 (like nowadays), the second peak between 40 and 49 in the second period, and between 50 and 59 in the third period (Figure 1).

Figure 1: The age group pattern of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients during the investigated period.

The number of HL patients with classic mixed cellularity histological subtype was decreasing after a temporary increase (43.7%, 58.23%, 42.6%, 饾憙 = 0 . 0 0 9 8 (it is only significant in the second period)). The classic nodular sclerosis subtype shows a increasing tendency (25%, 27.32%, 34.78%, 饾憙 = 0 . 1 7 3 4 ). Classical lymphocyte predominant subtype (cLP) was decreasing (17.1%, 7.57%, 5.21%, 饾憙 = 0 . 0 0 3 8 ). The number of classical lymphocyte depletion (cLD) subtype was decreasing significantly also (14.2%, 6.19%, 6.06%, 饾憙 = 0 . 0 1 8 1 ), nodular lymphocyte predominant (NLP) histological subtype can be seen only in the past decade, when the REAL/WHO classification was used (Figure 2).

Figure 2: The pattern of the histological subtypes of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients during the investigated period.

We found that the first incidence peak of the age group pattern is created predominantly by cNS; meanwhile, the second incidence peak is created by cMC histological subtype (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).

Figure 3: (a) The pattern of classical mixed cellularity histological subtype during the investigated period. (b) The pattern of classical nodular sclerosis histological subtype during the investigated period.

Investigating the histological subtypes according to the sexual distribution, we found that cMC subtype is predominant among males in every period, its ratio is much lower among females, and in the third period cNS subtype became predominant. Among males the cMC subtype, meanwhile among females the cNS subtype, is the most common in the third period. The incidence of cLP and cLD subtypes decreased; cLD shows a slight increase in the third period again. Furthermore, NLP subtypes have been diagnosed in the last periods with an incidence of 6.08% (Figure 4).

Figure 4: The pattern of the histological subtypes due to sexes during the investigated period.

Comparing the early- (first-second) and advanced- (third-fourth) stage disease, we found an increased ratio of early-stage disease, and the difference was statistically significant. The increase comes on one hand from the significant growth of the number of second stage patients (25.8%, 26.35%, 49.56%, 饾憙 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 ) and on the other hand from the significant reduction of the number of third stage patients (53.4%, 50.67%, 20%, 饾憙 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 ). Nowadays half of the patients is diagnosed in the second stage of the disease (Figure 5).

Figure 5: The distribution of the stages during the investigated period.

From the first symptom (lymphadenomegaly and/or complain) until the diagnosis of the disease lasted an average 6.2 months in the first period. In the second period this only took 4.2 months and only 2.6 months in the third period.

We found that 45.59% of the early-stage patients and 28.26% of the advanced-stage patients were concerned to be in the unfavourable prognostic group.

The majority of the patients had B symptoms at the time of the diagnosis.

The 5-year overall survival was 59.7%, 77.4%, and recently 90.5%   ( 饾憙 < 0 . 0 0 1 ) , and the 10-year overall survival data were also progressing: 44.1%, 70.6% and 90.5% (prognosed survival) in the last decade (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Overall survival during the investigated period.

During the investigated period, a total number of 154 patients passed away. More than 60% of them were diagnosed in the first period; they died predominantly of Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The mortality coming from the basic disease was decreasing after this time (in the second period the basic disease mortality reduced into half), the remaining patients died of infection, second tumor, cardiopulmonary failure, and other factors (e.g., accidents) in nearly the same ratio. Comparing to the others, in the last period the mortality became minimal with still the predominance of the basic disease (Figure 7).

Figure 7: The distribution of the cause of death, HL: Hodgkin lymphoma, LFU: lost to followup.

4. Conclusion

The incidence of HL was the greatest in North America (male: 3.2/100000, female: 2.4/100000), the smallest in East Asia (male: 0.3/100000, female: 0.1/100000), in Central and Eastern Europe ??? both males and females: 2.3/100000 in 2002 [2]. Data of Hungary from 2000 to 2003 reports an average incidence of 2.02/100000 among males and 1.59/100000 among females, but estimating Hungarian data, the fact must be considered that probably not every case was reported. Hence, the incidence of the disease can be considered average, both on the whole and due to sexual distribution [20]. Our current trial is not representative; hence, estimating incidence is not possible.

In Hungary 9 trials dealed with data of HL patients (Table 2). The duration of these trials differs significantly from each other (1 year [14] to 22 years [13, 19]); furthermore, these trials show great variability due to geographic differences (data from whole Hungary [14, 20] to investigate patients from only one county [13, 15]). Hence, exacting comparison and drawing conclusions is not possible, and attention can be attracted to further comprehensive trials.

Table 2: Hungarian trials dealing with HL patients.

Investigating sexual distribution generally male predominance was found; three trials found slight female predominance [12, 14, 15]. This ratio came from the female predominance in the cNS subtype in Kelényi et al. Estimating the results of Iványi et al. is hard, because among the diagnosed 86 patients only 66 patients’ data were processed during their investigated period [15]. The mean age is around 40 in every trial (35.8–41.7 years) and shows a persistent slight decrease. The most common histological subtype—except for one trial—was cMC. Illés et al. presented countrywise data, whereas cNS was found to be the most common subtype during the investigated period of 4 years (between 2000 and 2003). Both uni- and bimodal age group patterns were found; the incidence peak in young adults around twenties was present everywhere. B symptoms were present unequivocally, more than half of the patients in every trial. The majority of the patients were diagnosed in the advanced stage, but it is hope worthy that both a trial in the current decade (2000–2003 countrywise data [20]) and our investigation’s last period reports the diagnosis in early stage.

Between 1960 and 1997 in Scandinavian countries, in India, and in North America, the increase of the incidence of HL was found among teenagers and young adults. This increase was found rather among females and was primarily linked to the cNS subtype. In elderly rather a decreasing tendency was found, which was explained by the development of diagnostical methods [21]. A trial between 1984 and 1993 in the United Kingdom found the decrease of the incidence in both sexes, in every age groups, except for males between 1 and 24 [22]. Investigating seven European countries no changes was found in the incidence between 1985 and 1992 [23].

In our current study, the authors found the decrease of the number of patients, although the last period was one year shorter. The male/female ratio decreased as well, currently the number of male and female patients is almost equal. The mean age shows a decreasing tendency as well. Although the reason of this phenomenon is unknown, but shows similarity to the mentioned international data above [21].

Whereas we found a unimodal age group pattern in the first two periods, nowadays a bimodal age group pattern can be seen, with an incidence peak in young adults (20–29 years) and another in elderly (50–59 years), likewise to developed countries [2]. The fact that not all patients—especially the elderly—were treated in oncohematological centers can play a role in the explanation of the previously observed unimodal age group pattern. Hence, reporting the disease to the Hungarian Hodgkin’s Disease Work Group did not occur every time. This phenomenon matches with the results of the last Hungarian survey [20].

Correspondingly, the distribution of the histological subtypes is characteristic to the developed countries. We found the significant decrease of the cMC subtype and the increase of the cNS subtype (not significantly). In the last period the incidence peak of young adults is created by the cNS subtype; meanwhile, the other incidence peak among elderly is created by the cMC subtype. Due to the introduction of the WHO’s histological classification since 2000, the number of patients with cLP subtype decreased and with the new subtype, the NLP increased.

Patients diagnosed in the early stage become more frequent in the last period. The number of patients in the advanced stage decreased significantly, parallel with the significant increase of early-stage patients. Nowadays every second patient is diagnosed in stage two In the last decades the number of patients in stage three was decreasing continuously; accordingly, the number of stage two and early-stage patients were increasing continuously. This tendency suits with international authors’ observation [24, 25]. Beyond the developing diagnostic methods (immunohistochemical examinations, developing imaging methods, like using PET/CT routinely), the patients’ awareness (thanks to media, internet) and the highly educated workers in basic medical attendance can also play a role in the backstage of this phenomenon. Hence, the patients are treated earlier. Since, the patients are diagnosed in earlier stages, their chance to survive and their quality of life are continuously progressing, because of the lower dose and less toxic treatment at their case. Accordingly, the overall survive progressed.

According to international data, the 10-year overall survival of HL patients is 75–85% [20, 26], which are similar to our results. 5-year overall survival progressed, because of better treatment based on prognostic factors and better supportation.

The decrease of mortality—especially the mortality because of the basic disease—can be explained by developing treating methods as well. The mortality because of the basic disease fall to the half between the first and the second periods and fall to the third between second and third periods. Due to the more toxic polichemotherapy and extended-field, greater-dose irradiation used in the previous periods, the mortality coming from the late side effects of the treatment is still determinative. Only further follow can decide, whether how much can new treatment methods reduce these factors of mortality.

Investigating HL patients in the same geographical localisation in different periods gives an opportunity to observe the effects of different factors (e.g., viral infection, socioeconomic changes) on the characteristics of the disease [1]. Based on our results, it can be established that the clinical pathological features of Hodgkin lymphoma are changing in Hungary. We found the pattern to be characteristic to the developed countries out of the three epidemiologic patterns. Rising economy affects the socioeconomic status. The population is infected (e.g., EBV) fewer times. Beside the changes of these immunological features, much more environmental expositions affect people than previously stated. These facts and comprehensive (countrywise or different geographical locations) epidemiological trials can help in questing for the reasons, the treatment, and the survival of the disease.


  1. K. C. Chang, P. C. H. Chen, D. Jones, and I. J. Su, 鈥淐hanging patterns in the frequency of Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and Epstein-Barr virus association in Taiwan,鈥 Cancer Science, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 345鈥349, 2008. View at PublisherView at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  2. O. Landgren and N. E. Caporaso, 鈥淣ew aspects in descriptive, etiologic, and molecular epidemiology of Hodgkin's lymphoma,鈥 Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 825鈥840, 2007. View at PublisherView at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  3. G. J. MacFarlane, T. Evstifeeva, P. Boyle, and S. Grufferman, 鈥淚nternational patterns in the occurrence of Hodgkin's disease in children and young adult males,鈥 International Journal of Cancer, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 165鈥169, 1995. View at PublisherView at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  6. R. J. Lukes, L. F. Craver, and T. C. Hall, 鈥淩eport of the nomenclatura committee,鈥 Cancer Research, vol. 26, p. 1311, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  7. N. L. Harris, E. S. Jaffe, J. Diebold et al., 鈥淭he World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997,鈥 Histopathology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 69鈥89, 2000. View at PublisherView at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  8. P. P. Carbone, H. S. Kaplan, and K. Musshoff, 鈥淩eport of the committee on Hodgkin's disease staging classification,鈥 Cancer Research, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1860鈥1861, 1971. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  9. T. A. Lister, D. Crowther, S. B. Sutcliffe et al., 鈥淩eport of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease: Cotswolds meeting,鈥 Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1630鈥1636, 1989. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  10. M. Tubiana, M. Henry-Amar, P. Carde et al., 鈥淭oward comprehensive management tailored to prognostic factors of patients with clinical stages I and II in Hodgkin's disease. The EORTC Lymphoma Group controlled clinical trials: 1964鈥1987,鈥 Blood, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 47鈥56, 1989. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  11. D. Hasenclever and V. Diehl, 鈥淎 prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease,鈥 The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 21, pp. 1506鈥1514, 1998. View at PublisherView at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  12. Z. Simon, K. Keresztes, Z. Milt茅nyi et al., 鈥淸Our experiences in treating patients with Hodgkin disease in the last decade],鈥 Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 148, no. 15, pp. 675鈥682, 2007. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar
  13. L. Istv谩n and S. Giczy, 鈥淓pidemiology of Hodgkin's disease,鈥 Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 319鈥324, 1979. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  14. G. Kel茅nyi and M. V谩rbir贸, 鈥淸Malignant lymphoma reference center-1978],鈥 Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 121, no. 29, pp. 1763鈥1766, 1980. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  15. J. L. Iv谩nyi, A. Kiss, B. Telek, K. Pecze, and K. R谩k, 鈥淓xperience with the treatment of Hodgkin's disease (1975-1986),鈥 Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 339鈥343, 1988. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  16. T. Fleischmann, Malignus Limfom谩s Betegeink N茅h谩ny Retrospekt铆v Adata, Magyar Onkol贸gusok T谩rsas谩ga X. Kongresszusa, Budapest, Hungary, 1985.
  17. E. Ber茅nyi, G. Szegedi, K. Szab贸 et al., 鈥淐omprehensive epidemiologic and clinico-pathologic study of Hodgkin's disease,鈥 Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 130, no. 17, pp. 869鈥874, 1989. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  18. J. Endr茅di, T. L谩szl贸, and G. Kel茅nyi, 鈥淟ymphoma referencia centrum 1987鈥88,鈥 Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 132, pp. 733鈥739, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  19. 脕. Ill茅s, G. Vad谩sz, L. Gergely, and G. Szegedi, 鈥淗odgkin-k贸ros betegek kezel茅s茅vel szerzett tapasztalataink,鈥 Magyar Belorvosi Archivum, vol. 51, pp. 283鈥288, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Ill茅s, K. Keresztes, Z. Milt茅nyi, and Z. Moln谩r, 鈥淎 Hodgkin-k贸r hazai epidemiol贸giai 茅s kezel茅si adatai,鈥 Hematol贸gia Transzfuziol贸gia, vol. 37, pp. 153鈥163, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. A. Cartwright and G. Watkins, 鈥淓pidemiology of Hodgkin's disease: a review,鈥 Hematological Oncology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 11鈥26, 2004. View at PublisherView at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  22. R. Cartwright, R. McNally, E. Roman, J. Simpson, and J. Thomas, 鈥淚ncidence and time trends in Hodgkin's disease: from parts of the United Kingdom (1984鈥1993),鈥 Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 367鈥377, 1998. View at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  23. R. Cartwright, H. Brincker, P. M. Carli et al., 鈥淭he rise in incidence of lymphomas in Europe 1985鈥1992,鈥 European Journal of Cancer, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 627鈥633, 1999. View at PublisherView at Google ScholarView at Scopus
  24. B. Glimelius, G. Enblad, M. K盲lkner et al., 鈥淭reatment of Hodgkin's disease: the Swedish National Care Programme experience,鈥 Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 21, no. 1-2, pp. 71鈥78, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Somers, Treament Strategy in Hodgkin鈥檚 Disease, vol. 196, INSERM/John Libbey Eurotext, 1999.
  26. Z. Moln谩r, 鈥淎 Hodgkin-k贸r kezel茅s茅nek aktu谩lis k茅rd茅sei,鈥 Hematol贸gia Transzfuziol贸gia, vol. 37, pp. 149鈥151, 2004. View at Google Scholar