International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 394545 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/394545

Lowly Expressed Ribosomal Protein S19 in the Feces of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Academic Editor: A. Amedei
Received16 Aug 2011
Accepted04 Oct 2011
Published09 Jan 2012

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become one of the most common fatal cancers. CRC tumorigenesis is a complex process involving multiple genetic changes to several sequential mutations or molecular alterations. P53 is one of the most significant genes; its mutations account for more than half of all CRC. Therefore, understanding the cellular genes that are directly or indirectly related to p53 is particularly crucial for investigating CRC tumorigenesis. In this study, a p53-related ribosomal protein, ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19), obtained from the feces of CRC patients is evaluated by using specifically quantitative real-time PCR and knocked down in the colonic cell line by gene silencing. This study found that CRC patients with higher expressions of RPS19 in their feces had a better prognosis and consistent expressions of RPS19 and BAX in their colonic cells. In conclusion, the potential mechanism of RPS19 in CRC possibly involves cellular apoptosis through the BAX/p53 pathway, and the levels of fecal RPS19 may function as a prognostic predictor for CRC patients.

1. Introduction

Despite progress in reducing the incidence and mortality rate and improving patient survival, human cancers still account for numerous deaths [1]. Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become one of the most common fatal cancers, involving a complex process with multiple genetic changes [24]. This molecular heterogeneity possibly results from multiple sequential mutations or molecular alterations during tumorigenesis [5]. Therefore, the identification of CRC-related genes will assist in cancer prevention, detection, and prognostic prediction [68].

One important tumor suppressor, p53, is known to prevent cancer, but is also involved in CRC progression [9, 10]. Mutations of p53 account for more than half of all CRCs, particularly in patients at the more advanced stages [11]. Numerous cellular genes are also out of control because of the abnormal p53 expression during tumor progression [12, 13]. For example, the p53-related ribosomal proteins (RPs) were identified as cancer-related molecules [14, 15], indicating that the oncogenic potential of RPs result from the relationship between p53 and RPs [1618]. Moreover, the p53-inducible modulator RPS27-like (RPS27L), which responds to genotoxic stress, was recently evaluated in CRC [19].

Feces can serve as the material for detecting genetic alterations in CRC [2022]. Numerous ribosomal proteins are significantly expressed in the feces of CRC patients [23]. In this study, p53-related RPS19 of CRC was further evaluated. Other studies have reported on the developmental abnormalities resulting from a RPS19 deficiency through the activation of the p53 protein family [24]. First, the clinical significance of RPS19 in feces was evaluated from the stool samples of CRC patients using specifically, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Then, the functional importance of RPS19 was addressed by silencing its expression in colonic cells. In this context, we explored the possible cell fate of changing the RPS19 expression in colonic cells, which could affect CRC patients’ survival.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Solid fecal samples of 101 CRC patients ( 𝑛 m a l e = 6 9 ; 𝑛 f e m a l e = 3 2 ) from the Cathay General Hospital and the Taipei Veterans General Hospital were obtained before surgery or application of chemotherapy, with IRB-approved informed consent. Follow-up data were obtained prospectively, and the mean follow-up time was 44.1 months (SD, 29.0; median, 37.8). Patients’ initial tumor stage and additional clinical information are listed in Table 1. Patients with distant metastasis were routinely confirmed by abdominal computed tomography.


VariableNo. of casesLevel of fecal RPS19 (%)
(≥2.76 × 10−5)
P

Age (yr)* 0.448
 <64.74727 (57.4)
 ≥64.75435 (64.8)
Gender 0.140
 Male6939 (56.5)
 Female3223 (71.9)
Depth of invasion 0.303
 T1 + T21511 (73.3)
 T3 + T48651 (59.3)
Lymphatic invasion 0.068
 N05337 (69.8)
 N1 + N2 + N34825 (52.1)
Distant metastasis 0.183
 No8454 (64.3)
 Yes178 (47.1)
Tumor size (cm)** 0.682
 <4.76136 (59.0)
 ≥4.73824 (63.2)
CEA (ng/mL)** 0.907
 ≤56137 (60.7)
 >53722 (59.5)
CA19-9 (U/mL)** 0.829 
 <377445 (60.8)
 ≥372414 (58.3)

*mean age of 101 patients, 64.7 ys (range, 37.3–89.5). **available cases in tumor size, 99; in serum CEA and CA19-9 determinant, 98.
2.2. Total RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription Reaction

The HCT116 cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium with 5 mM of glutamine according to routine culture procedures. RNA from this cell line was extracted using the Easy Pure Total RNA Mini Kit (Bioman, Taiwan) and reverse transcribed for single-stranded cDNAs using an oligo(dT)12 primer with the ABI Reverse Transcriptase kit (ABI, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocols [25]. Fecal RNA was prepared and reverse transcribed as described in our previous reports [22]. In brief, synthesized cDNA could be used directly in the following quantitative PCR analyses.

2.3. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The quantitations of RPS19 (NM001022), BAX (NM138764), and 18s rRNA (X03205) in fecal cDNA were performed using a TaqMan probe (probe no. 87 for RPS19, no. 55 for BAX, and no. 77 for 18 s rRNA) from the Human Universal Probe Library (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). The 18 s rRNA served as a housekeeping gene. Generally, each run of fecal samples must include the human reference cDNA (Clontech, USA) as standard to avoid errors because of run-to-run differences in RNA quantity. The primer sequences for these quantitations are listed in Table 2.


Gene namePrimer sequence*Probe no.

RPS19F: 5′-TCAGGGACAAAGAGATCTGGA-3′ 87
R: 5′-CATGGTTTGTTCTAATGCTTCTTG-3′
BAXF: 5′-CAAGACCAGGGTGGTTGG-3′ 55
R: 5′-CACTCCCGCCACAAAGAT-3′
18 s RNAF: 5′-CTCAACACGGGAAACCTCAC-3′ 77
R: 5′-CGCTCCACCAACTAAGAACG-3′

*F, forward; R, reverse; Probe no., from the “Human Universal Probe Library” of Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany.
2.4. Lentivirus-Mediated RNA Interference (RNAi) of RPS19

The lentiviral construct encoding the siRPS19 hairpin (pLKO.1-RPS19 : TRCN0000074915) for gene silencing (shRPS19) was obtained from the National RNAi Core Facility located at the Institute of Molecular Biology/Genomic Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei Taiwan. Additionally, the control (shLuc) for the lentivirus was pLKO.1-Luc (TRCN0000072246), and the infection of each lentivirus into colonic cells was performed according to our previous report [20]. The change in the expression of target RPS19 was quantified by qRT-PCR as previously described and immunodetected using western blotting as the routine procedure with minor modifications [25]. Briefly, 5 μg of protein was mixed with the reducing agent NuPAGE SDS sample buffer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), denatured for 10 min at 95°C, separated by a 12% SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and probed with mouse anti-human RPS19 (1 : 1000; sc-100836; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or rabbit anti-human actin (1 : 500; sc-1616-R; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) following standard procedures. The blots were then incubated with anti-mouse (for RPS19) or anti-rabbit (for actin) secondary antibodies (0.2 μg/mL) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. All western blots were developed using the Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagent (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The overall survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS). The MedCalc software statistical package was used to generate a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Significance was set at 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 .

3. Results

Over 40 ribosomal or ribosomal-associated genes were clustered due to their significantly differential expressions ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ) in the feces of CRC patients from our previous report [23]. Notably, six p53-associated RPs, including two large- and four small-ribosomal protein transcripts, were clustered by the average-linkage hierarchical clustering method (Figure 1). The 11 CRC patients and two distinct normal pools could be classified into two groups (E and L). First, 80% (4 of 5) of patients of the L group were in the late Dukes’ stages (one in Dukes’ stage C and three in stage D), and, with the exception of RPS6 (NM001010), their genes were downregulated. Conversely, RPS27L (NM015920), RPS7 (NM001011), and RPL26 (NM000987) were clustered together due to their increasing expressions in the feces of those in group E, which comprised mostly early-stage patients (67%, 4 of 6) and normal controls.

The clinical significances of RPS19 were further analyzed. The mRNA levels of RPS19 in the feces of CRC patients were stratified into two groups, RPS19+ (≥2.76 × 10−5) and RPS19 (<2.76 × 10−5), using ROC curve analysis. The area under the ROC curve for fecal RPS27L was 0.657 ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 1 2 ) with a 95% CI of 0.556 to 0.749 (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 3, the RPS19+ group ( 𝑛 = 6 2 ) had the better six-year overall survival rate ( 7 4 . 3 ± 1 2 . 2 %) than the RPS19 group did ( 4 0 . 9 ± 1 4 . 2 %; 𝑛 = 3 9 ) ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 0 8 , log-rank test).

To correlate the cellular function of RPS19, we infected lentiviruses into a colonic cell line with wild-type p53 (HCT116 p53+/+) to knockdown RPS19 (shRPS19) and control shRNA (shLuc). In the lentivirus-mediated RNAi experiment, shRPS19 achieved efficient knockdown at both the levels of mRNA and RPS19 protein (Figure 4). These RPS19-silent cells expressed only 9.2% BAX mRNA from RPS19-expressing cells compared to that from RPS19-expressing cells (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Our previous results revealed that numerous fecal molecules were differentially expressed in the feces of CRC patients [26]. Among the fecal molecules, a number of RP genes were listed with statistic significance [23]. RPs are involved not only in the cellular process of translation [27] but also in the growth and maintenance of all cell types [28]. Additionally, numerous reports emphasized that a strong correlation was found between RPs and p53 protein in cellular functions [17, 18, 29]. For example, RPL26 can regulate the translation and induction of p53 after DNA damage [30]. RPS6 participated in the activation of a p53-dependent cell cycle checkpoint [31]. RPS27L was proven to be a p53-inducible modulator of cell fate in response to genotoxic stress [32], and mutant p53 seemed to cause aberrant RPS27L expression, which can lead to the accumulation of tumorigenic CRC cells and a poor prognosis [19].

Besides the p53-associated RPs, other RPs were also revealed to contribute to the onset of cancer or multidrug resistance [3335]. For example, RPS3 is involved in the onset of cancer [33], RPS13 and RPL23 promote the multidrug resistance of gastric cancer cells [35], and RPL19 is involved in the prognosis of prostate cancer and CRC [23, 36]. Recently, the direct relationship between feces and colonic cells was proven [37, 38]. When combined, detecting fecal RPs, specifically p53-related RPs, might be valuable for evaluating the molecular pathogenesis of CRC [14, 15, 39].

In this study, the overall survival data revealed that CRC patients with higher fecal expressions of RPS19 had a better prognosis. When RPS19 was knocked down in colonic cells, an apoptotic gene (BAX) extremely reduced the expressions in RPS19-silent cells. Nevertheless, most studies of RPS19 examined mutations in the RPS19 gene in patients with Diamond-Blackfan anemia [40, 41]. Cells with an RPS19 deficiency correlate with p53 dysregulation, which may cause developmental anomalies [24]. To our knowledge, we are the first to reveal the differentially expressed RPS19 in CRC with clinical significance. From the results of consistent expressions of RPS19 and BAX, we suggest that downregulated RPS19 might impair the apoptotic function of colonic cells. This argument supports the clinical data that CRC patients with lower fecal expressions of RPS19 had a poor prognosis.

5. Conclusions

We succeeded in quantifying the mRNA level of RPS19 in feces. The potential mechanism of RPS19 in CRC possibly involves cellular apoptosis through the BAX/p53 pathway [42]. Our results provide some evidence that the levels of fecal RPS19 may function as a prognostic predictor for CRC patients. Finally, clinical use of feces in translational research is promising for the future of CRC diagnosis [43].

Authors’ Contribution

C.-C. Chien and T.-C. Tu contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of the patients involved in this study. This study was partially supported by grant from the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC100-2320-B-281-001 to C.-J. Huang).

References

  1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, Y. Hao, J. Xu, and M. J. Thun, “Cancer statistics, 2009,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 225–249, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Bardelli and V. E. Velculescu, “Mutational analysis of gene families in human cancer,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Rozen, “Cancer of the gastrointestinal tract: early detection or early prevention?” European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Vogelstein, E. R. Fearon, S. R. Hamilton et al., “Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 319, no. 9, pp. 525–532, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  5. N. Beerenwinkel, T. Antal, D. Dingli et al., “Genetic progression and the waiting time to cancer,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 3, article e225, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. M. Center, A. Jemal, R. A. Smith, and E. Ward, “Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 366–378, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Kimura, M. Sumiyoshi, and K. Baba, “Antitumor activities of synthetic and natural stilbenes through antiangiogenic action,” Cancer Science, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 2083–2096, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. C. Watine and P. S. Bunting, “Mass colorectal cancer screening: methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 7-8, pp. 459–466, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Kikuchi-Yanoshita, M. Konishi, S. Ito et al., “Genetic changes of both p53 alleles associated with the conversion from colorectal adenoma to early carcinoma in familial adenomatous polyposis and non-familial adenomatous polyposis patients,” Cancer Research, vol. 52, no. 14, pp. 3965–3971, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  10. D. P. Lane and S. Benchimol, “p53: oncogene or anti-oncogene?” Genes and Development, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  11. B. Iacopetta, “TP53 mutation in colorectal cancer,” Human Mutation, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 271–276, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Hague and C. Paraskeva, “Apoptosis and disease: a matter of cell fate,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1366–1372, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. J. Hofseth, S. P. Hussain, and C. C. Harris, “p53: 25 years after its discovery,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 177–181, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Kobayashi, Y. Sasaki, Y. Oshima et al., “Activation of the ribosomal protein L13 gene in human gastrointestinal cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 161–170, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  15. H. Wang, L. N. Zhao, K. Z. Li, R. Ling, X. J. Li, and L. Wang, “Overexpression of ribosomal protein L15 is associated with cell proliferation in gastric cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 6, article no. 91, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. J. Anderson, J. P. H. Lauritsen, M. G. Hartman et al., “Ablation of ribosomal protein L22 selectively impairs αβ T cell development by activation of a p53-dependent checkpoint,” Immunity, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 759–772, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Chen, Z. Zhang, M. Li et al., “Ribosomal protein S7 as a novel modulator of p53-MDM2 interaction: Binding to MDM2, stabilization of p53 protein, and activation of p53 function,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 35, pp. 5029–5037, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Ofir-Rosenfeld, K. Boggs, D. Michael, M. B. Kastan, and M. Oren, “Mdm2 regulates p53 mRNA translation through inhibitory interactions with ribosomal protein L26,” Molecular Cell, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 180–189, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. T. Tien, C. C. Chien, S. H. Yang, C. M. Lin, Y. Y. Wu, and C. J. Huang, “p53-dependent expression of ribosomal protein S27-like in colorectal cancer,” Fu-Jen Journal of Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C.-J. Huang, S.-H. Yang, S.-M. Huang et al., “A predicted protein, KIAA0247, is a cell cycle modulator in colorectal cancer cells under 5-FU treatment,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 9, article 82, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Kanaoka, K. I. Yoshida, N. Miura, H. Sugimura, and M. Kajimura, “Potential usefulness of detecting cyclooxygenase 2 messenger RNA in feces for colorectal cancer screening,” Gastroenterology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 422–427, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. N. Yang, S. H. Yang, C. C. Chang, C. C. Chien, S. Pan, and C. J. Huang, “Upregulation of fecal cytokeratin 19 is associated with prognosis in older colorectal cancer patients,” Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 703–708, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. J. Huang, C. C. Chien, S. H. Yang et al., “Faecal ribosomal protein L19 is a genetic prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 5B, pp. 1936–1943, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. Danilova, K. M. Sakamoto, and S. Lin, “Ribosomal protein S19 deficiency in zebrafish leads to developmental abnormalities and defective erythropoiesis through activation of p53 protein family,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 13, pp. 5228–5237, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. C. Chang, S. H. Yang, C. C. Chien et al., “Clinical meaning of age-related expression of fecal cytokeratin 19 in colorectal malignancy,” BMC Cancer, vol. 9, article no. 376, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. C. Chien, C. C. Chang, S. H. Yang, S. H. Chen, and C. J. Huang, “A homologue of the Drosophila headcase protein is a novel tumor marker for early-stage colorectal cancer,” Oncology reports., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 919–926, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  27. V. Ramakrishnan and P. B. Moore, “Atomic structures at last: the ribosome in 2000,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 144–154, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. I. G. Wool, “The structure and function of eukaryotic ribosomes,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 48, pp. 719–754, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  29. A. W. MacInnes, A. Amsterdam, C. A. Whittaker, N. Hopkins, and J. A. Lees, “Loss of p53 synthesis in zebrafish tumors with ribosomal protein gene mutations,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 30, pp. 10408–10413, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Takagi, M. J. Absalon, K. G. McLure, and M. B. Kastan, “Regulation of p53 translation and induction after DNA damage by ribosomal protein L26 and nucleolin,” Cell, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 49–63, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Panić, S. Tamarut, M. Sticker-Jantscheff et al., “Ribosomal protein S6 gene haploinsufficiency is associated with activation of a p53-dependent checkpoint during gastrulation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 26, no. 23, pp. 8880–8891, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Li, J. Tan, L. Zhuang et al., “Ribosomal protein S27-like, a p53-inducible modulator of cell fate in response to genotoxic stress,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 23, pp. 11317–11326, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. V. Hegde, S. Yadavilli, and W. A. Deutsch, “Knockdown of ribosomal protein S3 protects human cells from genotoxic stress,” DNA Repair, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 94–99, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. D. W. Shen, X. J. Liang, T. Suzuki, and M. M. Gottesman, “Identification by functional cloning from a retroviral cDNA library of cDNAs for ribosomal protein L36 and the 10-kDa heat shock protein that confer cisplatin resistance,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1383–1388, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Shi, H. Zhai, X. Wang et al., “Ribosomal proteins S13 and L23 promote multidrug resistance in gastric cancer cells by suppressing drug-induced apoptosis,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. 337–346, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Bee, Y. Ke, S. Forootan et al., “Ribosomal protein L19 is a prognostic marker for human prostate cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2061–2065, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. C. Chung, “Stool DNA testing and colon cancer prevention: another step forward,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 149, no. 7, pp. 509–510, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. Yajima, M. Ishii, H. Matsushita et al., “Expression profiling of fecal colonocytes for RNA-based screening of colorectal cancer,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1029–1037, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  39. M. J. Clemens, “Targets and mechanisms for the regulation of translation in malignant transformation,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 3180–3188, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Badhai, J. Schuster, O. Gidlöf, and N. Dahl, “5′UTR variants of ribosomal protein S19 transcript determine translational efficiency: Implications for Diamond-Blackfan anemia and tissue variability,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e17672, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Flygare and S. Karlsson, “Diamond-Blackfan anemia: erythropoiesis lost in translation,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 8, pp. 3152–3154, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. I. Sturm, C. H. Köhne, G. Wolff et al., “Analysis of the p53/BAX pathway in colorectal cancer: low BAX is a negative prognostic factor in patients with resected liver metastases,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1364–1374, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  43. Y. Koga, M. Yasunaga, S. Katayose et al., “Improved recovery of exfoliated colonocytes from feces using newly developed immunomagnetic beads,” Gastroenterology Research Practice, vol. 2008, Article ID 605273, 7 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Chih-Cheng Chien et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

804 Views | 366 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.