International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 305349 |

Sathiyanarayanan Anusuya, Muthukrishnan Sathiyabama, "Effect of Chitosan on Rhizome Rot Disease of Turmeric Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2014, Article ID 305349, 5 pages, 2014.

Effect of Chitosan on Rhizome Rot Disease of Turmeric Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum

Academic Editor: H. Stamatis
Received17 Dec 2013
Accepted13 Feb 2014
Published06 Mar 2014


Chitosan was evaluated for its potential to induce antifungal hydrolases in susceptible turmeric plant (Curcuma longa L.). Under field conditions, the application of chitosan (crab shell) to turmeric plants by foliar spray method induces defense enzymes such as chitinases and chitosanases. Such an increase in enzyme activity was enhanced by spraying chitosan (0.1% w/v) on leaves of turmeric plants at regular intervals. Gel electrophoresis revealed new chitinase and chitosanase isoforms in leaves of turmeric plants treated with chitosan. Treated turmeric plants showed increased resistance towards rhizome rot disease caused by Pythium aphanidermatum, whereas control plants expressed severe rhizome rot disease. Increased activity of defense enzymes in leaves of chitosan treated turmeric plants may play a role in restricting the development of disease symptoms. The eliciting properties of chitosan make chitosan a potential antifungal agent for the control of rhizome rot disease of turmeric.

1. Introduction

The rhizome rot disease caused by Pythium aphanidermatum is the most destructive disease of turmeric plants in India, which reduces its economic and commercial value [1, 2]. At present, effective fungicides are not available. Therefore, it is necessary to search for effective methods to control this pathogen. The possibility of stimulating internal plant defenses has become an interesting option for enhancing natural disease resistance. Higher plants have the ability to initiate various defense mechanisms when they are infected either by phytopathogens or after treatment with biotic and abiotic elicitors. Among the elicitors known to date, chitosan, a polyvalent cation, has been shown to act as a potent oligosaccharide elicitor which can induce defense responses in plant tissue [3]. Plant defense-related enzymes were known to participate in early defense mechanisms and to prevent pathogen infections [4, 5]. Chitosan has attracted tremendous attention as a potentially important biological resource due to its biological properties including biocompatibility, nontoxicity, and biodegradability [6]. Chitosan has been found to interfere with the growth of several plant pathogenic fungi [4, 79]. The potential of chitosan to protect fungal diseases of various horticultural plants has been studied in various investigations [4, 911]. The interest in the antimicrobial properties of chitosan was focused on its possible role in plant protection. Hence, the present study was carried out to induce resistance in susceptible turmeric plant (Erode local) against rhizome rot disease by application of chitosan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biological Material

Rhizomes of Curcuma longa (L.) cultivar Erode local (susceptible) were obtained from a farmer’s field at Erode, Tamilnadu, India. The fungus P. aphanidermatum was obtained from ITCC (Indian Type Culture Collection), New Delhi, India, and was maintained on potato dextrose agar.

2.2. Preparation of Chitosan

1 g chitosan (crab shell, Sigma Chem. Co., USA) was dissolved in 40 mL of distilled water containing 9 mL of 1 M acetic acid. The pH was adjusted to 6.0 using sodium acetate. From this stock, 0.1% (w/v) chitosan solution was prepared and used for elicitor treatment.

2.3. Foliar Application of Chitosan

Rhizomes were thoroughly washed with running tap water thrice followed by glass distilled water; surface was sterilized by immersion in a sodium hypochlorite 0.001% (v/v) solution for 15 min followed by several rinses of sterile distilled water. For the field experiment, rhizomes were sown in plots and each plot had 30 plants, respectively, at a farmer’s field, Erode district of Tamilnadu, India. For foliar spray, 30-day-old plants were treated with 0.1% chitosan (10 mL/plant) and the foliar spray was performed at a regular interval of 30 days up to 210 days. Water sprayed plants served as control. Each experiment was repeated three times.

2.4. Protein Extraction and Estimation

Leaf samples were collected at regular intervals and used for extraction. Turmeric leaves (1 g/2 mL) were homogenized with potassium phosphate buffer (0.02 M, pH 7.6) and centrifuged. The clear supernatant was used as a source of protein/defense enzyme. Protein content was determined by the method of [12] using BSA as standard.

2.5. Enzyme Assays

Chitinase was assayed by the method of Reissig et al. [13] using colloidal chitin as substrate. N-Acetyl glucosamine was used as standard. One unit of chitinase was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol of N-acetyl glucosamine per minute under assay condition.

Chitosanase activity was determined by the method of measuring the reducing sugars released from chitosan. The reducing sugars were estimated by the Nelson and Somogyi [14, 15] method using chitosamine HCl as standard. One unit of chitosanase was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol of reducing sugar as chitosamine per minute under assay condition.

2.6. Gel Electrophoresis

SDS-PAGE was carried out according to Laemmli [16]. Samples (50 μg protein) were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE. For chitinase localization, 0.1% (w/v) glycol chitin was included in the separation gel. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with calcofluor white M2R according to the procedure of Trudel and Asselin [17].

Chitosanase localization was carried out according to the method of Grenier and Asselin [18] in which the separation gel contains 0.02% glycol chitosan. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with calcofluor white M2R.

2.7. Disease Severity

Control and chitosan treated plants (60-day-old) were challenged with 5 mL spores of P. aphanidermatum ( spores/mL). Disease severity was observed at different age levels.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All the data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance to determine the significance of individual differences in and 0.05 levels. All statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 16 software support.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Chitosan on Protein Content in Leaves of Turmeric Plant

An increase in protein content in leaves of chitosan (0.1% w/v) treated plants was evident compared to control (water treated) plants (Figure 1).

3.2. Effect of Chitosan on Chitinase Activity

Turmeric plants treated with chitosan showed higher chitinase activity than untreated plants (Figure 2). There was a significant increase in chitinase activity in leaves of chitosan treated plants after 2 months and maximum chitinase activity was observed on the 7th month.

On SDS-PAGE, different new isoforms of chitinase were observed in treated plants (Figure 3). In control plants, on the 1st month there were four constitutive chitinase polypeptides observed with molecular mass 110, 75, 37, and 19.3 kDa. These chitinase isoforms remained up to the 7th month. In chitosan treated plants, in the 1st month the induced constitutive chitinase of molecular mass 110, 75, 37, and 19.3 kDa was observed and these isoforms remained up to the 7th month. In addition to this, a new chitinase isoform of 35 kDa was observed in the 4th month after treatment. Apart from this, another new isoform of molecular mass 32 kDa was observed in 5th month, respectively. A new constitutive chitinase isoform of 26 kDa was observed in the 6th and 7th month, respectively (Figure 3).

3.3. Effect of Chitosan on Chitosanase Activity

Turmeric plants treated with chitosan showed an increase in chitosanase activity over a period of time and reached maximum on the 7th month. Nearly a threefold increase in chitosanase was observed in treated plants (Figure 4).

Chitosanase separated on SDS-PAGE showed new polypeptides in chitosan treated turmeric plants. In control plants, chitosanase polypeptide with molecular mass 19 kDa was observed in all the months. Apart from this, 23 kDa chitosanase polypeptide was observed in the 5th month of control plants. In chitosan treated plants, apart from the constitutive chitosanase polypeptide (19 kDa), a new isoform was observed after the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th month with molecular mass ranging from 23–30 kDa (Figure 5).

3.4. Effect of Chitosan on Disease Severity of Rhizome Rot Disease of Turmeric

Chitosan treated plants challenged with P. aphanidermatum showed a significant decrease in disease severity when compared to control (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Inducing the plants own defense mechanisms by application of a biological inducer is thought to be a novel plant protection strategy. Chitosan can induce defense reactions in plants, including the induction of chitinase, chitosanase, and β-1,3 glucanase isoforms [19]. Chitosan and its derivatives offer a great potential as natural biodegradable substances which have antimicrobial and eliciting activities [5, 20]. Chitinase and chitosanase have been identified as PR proteins which might be implicated in plant defense system against pathogenic fungi [21, 22]. In the present study, we demonstrated that chitosan induced chitinase activity in leaves of turmeric plants. New chitinase isoforms were observed in treated plants. Chitosan stimulated chitinase production in cucumber plant and offered protection from root rot disease caused by Pythium aphanidermatum [18]. Celery, Apium graveolens, treated with chitosan showed a 20-fold increase in chitinase activity compared to that of chitosan-untreated plants and exhibited a delay in symptom expression caused by F. oxysporum [23]. It has been reported that a constitutive high level expression of chitinases in transgenic plants can enhance resistance to a variety of pathogens [24]. Prapagdee et al. [25] reported increased chitinase activity and the role of chitosan in protection of soybean. Our results could imply that the application of chitosan might sensitize the turmeric plant in protecting themselves from the phytopathogenic fungal invasion by elaboration of chitinase and chitosanase activity.

5. Conclusion

Chitosan played an important role in the growth suppression of P. aphanidermatum infection in turmeric plants. Increase in chitinase and chitosanase activity may play a role in enhanced resistance in turmeric plants against P. aphanidermatum infection.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Muthukrishnan Sathiyabama would like to thank Tamilnadu State Council for Science and Technology for providing financial support. The authors would also like to thank the University authorities for providing facilities to carry out the research work.


  1. T. S. Ramakrishnan and C. K. Sowmini, “Rhizome and root rot of turmeric caused by Pythium graminicolum sub,” Indian Phytopathology, vol. 7, pp. 152–159, 1954. View at: Google Scholar
  2. C. Ushamalini, P. Nakkeeran, and T. Marimuthu, “Induction of plant defence enzymes in turmeric plants by Trichoderma viride,” Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 79–93, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. L. A. Terry and D. C. Joyce, “Elicitors of induced disease resistance in postharvest horticultural crops: a brief review,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Ben-Shalom, R. Ardi, R. Pinto, C. Aki, and E. Fallik, “Controlling gray mould caused by Botrytis cinerea in cucumber plants by means of chitosan,” Crop Protection, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 285–290, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Bautista-Baños, A. N. Hernández-Lauzardo, M. G. Velázquez-Del Valle et al., “Chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest diseases of horticultural commodities,” Crop Protection, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 108–118, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Kurita, “Chemistry and application of chitin and chitosan,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 59, no. 1–3, pp. 117–120, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. A. Bell, J. C. Hubbard, L. Liu, R. Michael Davis, and K. V. Subbarao, “Effects of chitin and chitosan on the incidence and severity of Fusarium yellows of celery,” Plant Disease, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 322–328, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. Sathiyabama and R. Balasubramanian, “Chitosan induces resistance components in Arachis hypogaea against leaf rust caused by Puccinia arachidis Speg,” Crop Protection, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 307–313, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Bautista-Baños, M. Hernández-López, E. Bosquez-Molina, and C. L. Wilson, “Effects of chitosan and plant extracts on growth of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, anthracnose levels and quality of papaya fruit,” Crop Protection, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1087–1092, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Benhamou, P. J. Lafontaine, and M. Nicole, “Induction of systemic resistance to fusarium crown and root rot in tomato plants by seed treatment with chitosan,” Phytopathology, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 1432–1444, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  11. P. J. Lafontaine and N. Benhamou, “Chitosan treatment: An emerging strategy for enhancing resistance of greenhouse tomato plants to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici,” Biocontrol Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 111–124, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. L. Reissig, J. L. Strominger, and L. F. Leolori, “A modified colorimetric method for the estimation of N-acetylamino sugars,” The Journal of biological chemistry, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 959–966, 1955. View at: Google Scholar
  14. N. Nelson, “A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 153, pp. 375–380, 1944. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Somogyi, “Notes on sugar determination,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 195, pp. 19–23, 1952. View at: Google Scholar
  16. U. K. Laemmli, “Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4,” Nature, vol. 227, no. 5259, pp. 680–685, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Trudel and A. Asselin, “Detection of chitinase activity after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 362–366, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. Grenier and A. Asselin, “Some pathogenesis-related proteins are chitosanases with lytic activity against fungal spores,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 3, pp. 401–417, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. El Ghaouth, J. Arul, J. Grenier, N. Benhamou, A. Asselin, and R. Belanger, “Effect of chitosan on cucumber plants: suppression of Pythium aphanidermatum and induction of defense reactions,” Phytopathology, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 313–320, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  20. N. Benhamou, “Elicitor-induced plant defence pathways,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 233–240, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. El Ouakfaoui and A. Asselin, “Diversity of chitosanase activity in cucumber,” Plant Science, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  22. N. Shibuya and E. Minami, “Oligosaccharide signalling for defence responses in plant,” Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 223–233, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. L. Krebs and R. Grumet, “Characterization of celery hydrolytic enzymes induced in response to infection by Fusarium oxysporum,” Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 193–208, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Velazhahan and S. Muthukrishnan, “Transgenic tobacco plants constitutively overexpressing a rice thaumatin-like protein (PR-5) show enhanced resistance to Alternaria alternata,” Biologia Plantarum, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 347–354, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. Prapagdee, K. Kotchadat, A. Kumsopa, and N. Visarathanonth, “The role of chitosan in protection of soybean from sudden death syndrome caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 1353–1358, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Sathiyanarayanan Anusuya and Muthukrishnan Sathiyabama. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.