Research Article

A Characteristic Analysis of One-Dimensional Two-Fluid Model with Interfacial Area Transport Equation

Table 1

Area-averaged data for Runs 13–29 at [9]*.

Run no. (%) (%) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s)

1324.965.980.360.370.37
1438.938.160.380.330.37
1532.6914.780.490.460.49
1620.410.110.450.16***0.45
1724.156.870.520.500.52
1826.1410.950.550.570.55
1919.9020.120.640.640.64
2015.840.140.620.07***0.61
2122.301.900.570.510.55
2220.173.390.750.770.76
2316.9917.390.850.820.84
2417.641.050.710.550.71
2514.371.780.840.900.85
2622.230.320.790.810.79
2713.130.141.580.41***1.58
2811.870.911.561.591.56
2919.272.291.691.841.70

: The run numbers are consistent with Vasavada [9].
**: The averaged velocity was void fraction-weighted velocity of Therminol 59 provided by Vasavada [9].
***: Due to the small sampling numbers of group-2 droplets, these velocity data are considered not statistically sound.