Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2011, Article ID 513467, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/513467
Research Article

On the Cauchy Problem for the b-Family Equations with a Strong Dispersive Term

1College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou 404000, Chongqing, China
2Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, China

Received 2 June 2011; Accepted 23 August 2011

Academic Editor: J. Biazar

Copyright © 2011 Xuefei Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider b-family equations with a strong dispersive term. First, we present a criterion on blow-up. Then global existence and persistence property of the solution are also established. Finally, we discuss infinite propagation speed of this equation.

1. Introduction

Recently, Holm and Staley [1] studied the exchange of stability in the dynamics of solitary wave solutions under changes in the nonlinear balance in a evolutionary partial differential equation related both to shallow water waves and to turbulence. They derived the following equations (the b-family equations): where denotes the velocity field and .

Detailed description of the corresponding strong solutions to (1.1) with being its initial data was given by Zhou [2]. He established a sufficient condition in profile on the initial data for blow-up in finite time. The necessary and sufficient condition for blow-up is still a challenging problem for us at present. More precious, Theorem 3.1 in [2] means that no matter what the profile of the compactly supported initial datum is (no matter whether it is positive or negative), for any in its lifespan, the solution is positive at infinity and negative at negative infinity; it is really a very nice property for the b-family equations.

The famous Camassa-Holm equation [3] and Degasperis-Procesi equation [4] are the special cases with and , respectively. Many papers [512] are devoted to their study.

In this paper, we consider the following b-family equations with a strong dispersive term: where , , and is the strong dispersive term.

Let ; then, the operator can be expressed by its associated Green's function as . So (1.2) is equivalent to the following equation:

Similar to the Camassa-Holm equation [5], it is easy to establish the following local well-posedness theorem for (1.2).

Theorem 1.1. Given , , then there exist a and a unique solution to (1.3) such that

To make the paper concise, we would like to omit the detailed proof.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we get a criterion on blow-up. A condition for global existence is found in Section 3. Persistence property is considered in Section 4. In Section 5, the infinite propagation speed will be established analogous to the b-family equation.

2. Blow-Up

The maximum value of in Theorem 1.1 is called the lifespan of the solution, in general. If , that is, , we say the solution blows up in finite time.

The following lemma tells us that the solution blows up if and only if the first-order derivative blows up.

Lemma 2.1. Assume that , . If , then the solution of (1.2) will exist globally in time. If , then the solution blows up if and only if becomes unbounded from below in finite time. If , the solution blows up in finite time if and only if becomes unbounded from above in finite time.

Proof. By direct computation, one has Hence, Applying on (1.2) and integration by parts, we obtain
If , then . Hence, Equation (2.4) implies the corresponding solution exists globally.
If , due to the Gronwall inequality, it is clear that, from (2.3), is bounded from below on and then the -norm of the solution is also bounded on . On the other hand, Therefore where we use (2.2). Hence, (2.6) tells us if -norm of the solution is bounded, then the -norm of the first derivative is bounded.
By the same argument, we can get the similar result for .
This completes the proof.

Motivated by Mckean's deep observation for the Camassa-Holm equation [7], we can do the similar particle trajectory as where is the lifespan of the solution; then, is a diffeomorphism of the line. Differentiating the first equation in (2.7) with respect to , one has Hence

Since it follows that

Then we establish sufficient condition on the initial data to guarantee blow-up for (1.2).

Theorem 2.2. Let . Suppose that and there exists an such that , Then the corresponding solution to (1.2) with as the initial datum blows up in finite time.

Proof. Suppose that the solution exists globally. Due to (2.11) and the initial condition (2.12), we have , and for all . Since , one can write and as Consequently, for all .
For any fixed , if , then Similarly, for , we also have Combining (2.16) and (2.17) together, we get that for any fixed , for all .
Differentiating (1.3), we get Differentiating with respect to , where is the diffeomorphism defined in (2.7), where we use (2.18) and the following inequality: .
Claim 1. is decreasing and for all .
Suppose not; that is, there exists a such that on and . Now, let Firstly, differentiating , we have Secondly, by the same argument, we get Hence, it follows from (2.22), (2.23), and the continuity property of ODEs that Moreover, due to (2.22) and (2.23) again, we have the following equation for : Now, substituting (2.20) into (2.25), it yields Before completing the proof, we need the following technical lemma.
Lemma 2.3. Suppose that is twice continuously differential satisfying Then blows up in finite time. Moreover, the blow-up time can be estimated in terms of the initial datum as
Let ; then, (2.26) is an equation of type (2.27) with . The proof is complete by applying Lemma 2.3.

Remark 2.4. Mckean got the necessary and sufficient condition for the Camassa-Holm equation in [7]. It is worth pointing out that Zhou and his collaborators [13] gave a new proof to Mckean's theorem. However, the necessary and sufficient condition for (1.2) is still a challenging problem for us at present.

3. Global Existence

In this section, a global existence result is proved.

Theorem 3.1. Supposing that , is one sign. Then the corresponding solution to (1.2) exists globally.

Proof. We can assume that . It is sufficient to prove has a lower and supper bound for all . In fact, so This completes the proof.

4. Persistence Property

Now, we will investigate the following property for the strong solutions to (1.2) in -space which asymptotically exponentially decay at infinity as their initial profiles. The main idea comes from a recent work of Zhou and his collaborators [6] for the standard Camassa-Holm equation (for slower decay rate, we refer to [14]).

Theorem 4.1. Assume that for some and , is a strong solution of (1.2) and that satisfies that for some , Then uniformly in the time interval .

Proof. First, we will introduce the weight function to get the desired result. This function with is independent on as follows: which implies that From (1.3), we can get Multiplying (4.5) by with and integrating the result in the -variable, we get from which we can deduce that Denoting and by Gronwall's inequality, we obtain Taking the limits in (4.8), we get Next differentiating (1.3) in the -variable produces the equation Using the weight function, we can rewrite (4.10) as Multiplying (4.11) by with and integrating the result in the -variable, it follows that For the second term on the right side of (4.12), we know Using the above estimate and the Hölder inequality, we deduce that Thanks to Gronwall's inequality, it holds that Taking the limits in (4.15), we have Combining (4.9) and (4.16) together, it follows that A simple calculation shows that there exists , depending only on , such that for any , Thus, for any appropriate function and , one sees that Similarly, we can get Thus, inserting the above estimates into (4.17), there exists a constant such that Hence, for any and any , we have Finally, taking the limit as goes to infinity in (4.22), we find that for any which completes the proof of the theorem.

5. Infinite Propagation Speed

Recently, Himonas and his collaborators established infinite propagation speed for the Camassa-Holm equation in [6]. Later, Guo [15, 16] considered a similar problem on the weakly dissipative Camassa-Holm equation and the weakly dissipative Degasperis-Procesi equation. Recently, infinite propagation speed for a class of nonlocal dispersive -equations was established in [17]. The purpose of this section is to give a more detailed description on the corresponding strong solution to (1.2) in its life span with initial data being compactly supported. The main theorem is as follows.

Theorem 5.1. Let . Assume that for some and , is a strong solution of (1.2). If has compact support , then for , one has where and denote continuous nonvanishing functions, with and for . Furthermore, is strictly increasing function, while is strictly decreasing function.

Proof. Since has compact support in in the interval , from (2.11), so does in the interval in its lifespan. Hence the following functions are well defined: with Then for , we have Similarly, when , we get Hence, as consequences of (5.4) and (5.5), we have On the other hand, It is easy to get Substituting identity (5.8) into , we obtain where we use (5.6).
Therefore, in the lifespan of the solution, we have By the same argument, one can check that the following identity for is true: In order to complete the proof, it is sufficient to let and .

Remark 5.2. The main result in [18] is that any nontrivial classical solution of the b-family equation with dispersive term will not have compact support if its initial data has this property. But Theorem 4.1 means that no matter what the profile of the compactly supported initial datum is (no matter whether it is positive or negative), for any in its lifespan, the solution is positive at infinity and negative at negative infinity. So Theorem 4.1 is an improvement of that in [18].

Acknowledgment

This work is partially supported by the Zhejiang Innovation Project (T200905), ZJNSF (Grant no. R6090109), and NSFC (Grant no. 11101376).

References

  1. D. D. Holm and M. F. Staley, “Nonlinear balance and exchange of stability of dynamics of solitons, peakons, ramps/cliffs and leftons in a 1+1 nonlinear evolutionary PDE,” Physics Letters A, vol. 308, no. 5-6, pp. 437–444, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. Y. Zhou, “On solutions to the Holm-Staley b-family of equations,” Nonlinearity, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 369–381, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. R. Camassa and D. D. Holm, “An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1661–1664, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  4. A. Degasperis and M. Procesi, “Asymptotic integrability,” in Symmetry and Perturbation Theory, A. Degasperis and G. Gaeta, Eds., pp. 23–37, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  5. A. Constantin and J. Escher, “Well-posedness, global existence, and blowup phenomena for a periodic quasi-linear hyperbolic equation,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 475–504, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  6. A. A. Himonas, G. Misiolek, G. Ponce, and Y. Zhou, “Persistence properties and unique continuation of solutions of the Camassa-Holm equation,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 511–522, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. H. P. McKean, “Breakdown of a shallow water equation,” Asian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 867–874, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  8. L. Molinet, “On well-posedness results for Camassa-Holm equation on the line: a survey,” Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 521–533, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  9. Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking for a shallow water equation,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 137–152, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking for a periodic shallow water equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 591–604, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. Y. Zhou, “Blow-up phenomenon for the integrable Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 328, no. 2-3, pp. 157–162, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  12. Y. Zhou, “Stability of solitary waves for a rod equation,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 977–981, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  13. Z. Jiang, L. Ni, and Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking for the Camassa-Holm equation,” In press.
  14. L. Ni and Y. Zhou, “A new asymptotic behavior of solutions to the Camassa-Holm equation,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. In press.
  15. Z. Guo, “Blow up, global existence, and infinite propagation speed for the weakly dissipative Camassa-Holm equation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 49, no. 3, Article ID 033516, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. Z. Guo, “Some properties of solutions to the weakly dissipative Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 246, no. 11, pp. 4332–4344, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  17. L. Ni and Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking and propagation speed for a class of nonlocal dispersive θ-equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Real World Applications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 592–600, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. X. Li, “The infinite propagation speed and the limit behavior for the b-family equation with dispersive term,” International Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 345–352, 2009. View at Google Scholar