Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2011, Article ID 712194, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/712194
Research Article

The DEA and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Departments' Performances: A Pilot Study

Department of Industrial Engineering, Atılım University, P.O. Box 06836, İncek, Ankara, Turkey

Received 7 August 2011; Accepted 5 October 2011

Academic Editor: Hui-Shen Shen

Copyright © 2011 Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. B. Golany, “An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of data envelopment analysis to effectiveness analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 725–734, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. S. H. Kornbluth, “Analysing policy effectiveness using cone restricted data envelopment analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1097–1104, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Golany and Y. A. Roll, “Incorporating standards via data envelopment analysis,” in Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, and L. M. Seiford, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Mass, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Halme, T. Joro, P. Korhonen, S. Salo, and J. Wallenius, “A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 103–115, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Adler, L. Friedman, and Z. Sinuany-Stern, “Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 249–265, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, and J. Zhu, Eds., Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 71, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2004.
  8. W. D. Cook and M. Kress, “A data envelopment model for aggregating preference ranking,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1302–1310, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  9. W. D. Cook, M. Kress, and L. M. Seiford, “Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 319–323, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. H. Green, J. R. Doyle, and W. D. Cook, “Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 461–472, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Norman and B. Stoker, Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  12. J. A. Ganley and J. S. Cubbin, Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992.
  13. Z. Sinuany-Stern, A. Mehrez, and Y. Hadad, “An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–124, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Friedman and Z. Sinuany-Stern, “Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 629–637, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. Sinuany-Stern and L. Friedman, “DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 470–478, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Oral, O. Kettani, and P. Lang, “A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects,” Management Science, vol. 7, no. 37, pp. 871–883, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  17. B. D. Rouyendegh and S. Erol, “The DEA—FUZZY ANP Department Ranking Model Applied in Iran Amirkabir University,” Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 103–114, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  18. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. S. K. De, R. Biswas, and A. R. Roy, “An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 209–213, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 505–518, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in some medical applications,” in Proceedings of the International Conference, 7th Fuzzy Days on Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications, vol. 2206 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 148–151, Dortmund, Germany, October 2001.
  22. K. Atanassov, G. Pasi, and R. Yager, “Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 859–868, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. D. H. Hong and C. H. Choi, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. W. Liu and G. J. Wang, “Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 220–233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making,” Control and Cybernetics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1037–1053, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 837–852, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Wang, “QoS-aware web services selection with intuitionistic fuzzy set under consumer's vague perception,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 4460–4466, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 2363–2379, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. Z. Xu, “Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 109–121, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  30. Z. S. Xu, “Models for multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 285–297, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 246–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. L. Hung and M. S. Yang, “Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1603–1611, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. F. Li and C. T. Cheng, “New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 23, no. 1-3, pp. 221–225, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Z. Liang and P. Shi, “Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 2687–2693, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  35. I. K. Vlachos and G. D. Sergiadis, “Intuitionistic fuzzy information—applications to pattern recognition,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. Wang and X. Xin, “Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 2063–2069, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Zhang and H. Fu, “Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1307–1317, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. E. Boran, S. Genç, M. Kurt, and D. Akay, “A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11363–11368, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. F. E. Boran, S. Genã, and D. Akay, “Personnel selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 493–503, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. F. E. Boran, “An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy multi criteria decision making method for facility location selection,” Mathematical and Computational Applications, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 487–496, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  41. F. E. Boran, K. Boran, and T. Menlik, “The evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS,” Energy Sources Part B, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Bessent and W. Bessent, “Evaluation of educational program proposals by means of DEA,” Educational Administration Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 82–107, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  43. C. Tomkins and R. Green, “An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the effciency of UK university departments of accounting,” Financial Accountability & Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 147–164, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  44. J. E. Beasley, “Comparing university departments,” Omega, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 171–183, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Johnes and G. Johnes, “Research funding and performance in U.K. University Departments of Economics: a frontier analysis,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 301–314, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Z. Sinuany-Stern, A. Mehrez, and A. Barboy, “Academic departments efficiency via DEA,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 543–556, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. H. Leitner, J. Prikoszovits, M. Schaffhauser-Linzatti, R. Stowasser, and K. Wagner, “The impact of size and specialisation on universities' department performance: a DEA analysis applied to Austrian universities,” Higher Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 517–538, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. M. Rayeni, G. Vardanyan, and F. H. Saljooghi, “The measurement of productivity growth in the academic departments using malmquist productivity index,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 2875–2880, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1179–1187, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Theory and Applications, vol. 35 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Physica, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
  51. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “A similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in supporting medical diagnostic reasoning,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC '04), vol. 3070 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 388–393, June 2004.
  52. P. Grzegorzewski, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet