`Journal of Applied MathematicsVolume 2012, Article ID 327434, 17 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/327434`
Research Article

## Common Fixed Points for Asymptotic Pointwise Nonexpansive Mappings in Metric and Banach Spaces

1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2Centre of Excellence in Mathematics, CHE, Si Ayutthaya Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand

Received 26 October 2011; Accepted 8 December 2011

Copyright © 2012 P. Pasom and B. Panyanak. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . We prove that the common fixed point set of any commuting family of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on is nonempty closed and convex. We also show that, under some suitable conditions, the sequence defined by , converges to a common fixed point of where they are asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on , are sequences in for all and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers. The related results for uniformly convex Banach spaces are also included.

#### 1. Introduction

A mapping on a subset of a Banach space is said to be asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive if there exists a sequence of mappings such that where , for all . This class of mappings was introduced by Kirk and Xu [1], where it was shown that if is a bounded closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space , then every asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping always has a fixed point. In 2009, Hussain and Khamsi [2] extended Kirk-Xu's result to the case of metric spaces, specifically to the so-called CAT(0) spaces. Recently, Kozlowski [3] defined an iterative sequence for an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping by and where and are sequences in and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers. He proved, under some suitable assumptions, that the sequence defined by (1.2) converges weakly to a fixed point of where is a uniformly convex Banach space which satisfies the Opial condition and converges strongly to a fixed point of provided is a compact mapping for some . On the other hand, Khan et al. [4] studied the iterative process defined by where are asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings on and are sequences in for all .

In this paper, motivated by the results mentioned above, we ensure the existence of common fixed points for a family of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in a CAT(0) space. Furthermore, we obtain and strong convergence theorems of a sequence defined by where are asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on a subset of a complete CAT(0) space and are sequences in for all , and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers. We also note that our method can be used to prove the analogous results for uniformly convex Banach spaces.

#### 2. Preliminaries

A metric space is a CAT(0) space if it is geodesically connected and if every geodesic triangle in is at least as “thin” as its comparison triangle in the Euclidean plane. It is well-known that any complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold having nonpositive sectional curvature is a CAT(0) space. Other examples include Pre-Hilbert spaces (see [5]), -trees (see [6]), Euclidean buildings (see [7]), and the complex Hilbert ball with a hyperbolic metric (see [8]). For a thorough discussion of these spaces and of the fundamental role they play in geometry, we refer the reader to Bridson and Haefliger [5].

Fixed point theory in CAT(0) spaces was first studied by Kirk (see [9, 10]). He showed that every nonexpansive (single-valued) mapping defined on a bounded closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space always has a fixed point. Since then the fixed point theory for single-valued and multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces has been rapidly developed, and many papers have appeared (see, e.g., [2, 1122] and the references therein). It is worth mentioning that fixed point theorems in CAT(0) spaces (specially in -trees) can be applied to graph theory, biology, and computer science (see, e.g., [6, 2326]).

Let be a metric space. A geodesic path joining to (or, more briefly, a geodesic from to ) is a map from a closed interval to such that , and for all . In particular, is an isometry and . The image of is called a geodesic (or metric) segment joining and . When it is unique, this geodesic is denoted by . The space is said to be a geodesic space if every two points of are joined by a geodesic, and is said to be uniquely geodesic if there is exactly one geodesic joining and for each . A subset is said to be convex if includes every geodesic segment joining any two of its points.

A geodesic triangle in a geodesic space consists of three points in (the vertices of ) and a geodesic segment between each pair of vertices (the edges of ). A comparison triangle for geodesic triangle in is a triangle in the Euclidean plane such that for .

A geodesic space is said to be a CAT(0) space if all geodesic triangles satisfy the following comparison axiom.

CAT(0): Let be a geodesic triangle in , and let be a comparison triangle for . Then, is said to satisfy the CAT(0) inequality if for all and all comparison points ,

Let , by Lemma  2.1(iv) of [14] for each , there exists a unique point such that We will use the notation for the unique point satisfying (2.2). We now collect some elementary facts about CAT(0) spaces.

Lemma 2.1. Let be a complete CAT(0) space.[5, Proposition  2.4] If is a nonempty closed convex subset of , then, for every , there exists a unique point such that . Moreover, the map is a nonexpansive retract from onto .[14, Lemma  2.4] For and , we have [14, Lemma  2.5] For and , we have

We now give the concept of -convergence and collect some of its basic properties. Let be a bounded sequence in a CAT(0) space . For , we set The asymptotic radius of is given by and the asymptotic center of is the set

It is known from Proposition  7 of [27] that, in a CAT(0) space, consists of exactly one point.

Definition 2.2 (see [28, 29]). A sequence in a CAT(0) space is said to -converge to if is the unique asymptotic center of for every subsequence of . In this case, we write and call the -limit of .

Lemma 2.3. Let be a complete CAT(0) space.(i)[28, page 3690] Every bounded sequence in has a -convergent subsequence.(ii)[30, Proposition  2.1] If is a closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space and if is a bounded sequence in , then the asymptotic center of is in .(iii)[14, Lemma  2.8] If is a bounded sequence in a complete CAT(0) space with and is a subsequence of with and the sequence converges, then .

Recall that a mapping is said to be nonexpansive [31] if where is called asymptotically nonexpansive [32] if there is a sequence of positive numbers with the property and such thatwhere is called an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping [1] if there exists a sequence of functions such that where . The following implications hold. A point is called a fixed point of if . We shall denote by the set of fixed points of . The existence of fixed points for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in CAT(0) spaces was proved by Hussain and Khamsi [2] as the following result.

Theorem 2.4. Let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . Suppose that is an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping. Then, is nonempty closed and convex.

#### 3. Existence Theorems

Let be a metric space and a family of subsets of . Then, we say that defines a convexity structure on if it contains the closed balls and is stable by intersection.

Definition 3.1 (see [2]). Let be a convexity structure on . We will say that is compact if any family of elements of has a nonempty intersection provided for any finite subset .

Let be a complete CAT(0) space. We denote by the family of all closed convex subsets of . Then, is a compact convexity structure on (see, e.g., [2]).

The following theorem is an extension of Theorem  4.3 in [33]. For an analog of this result in uniformly convex Banach spaces, see [34].

Theorem 3.2. Let be a nonempty bounded closed and convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . Then, for any commuting family of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on , the set of common fixed points of is nonempty closed and convex.

Proof. Let be the family of all finite intersections of the fixed point sets of mappings in the commutative family . We first show that has the finite intersection property. Let . By Theorem 2.4, is a nonempty closed and convex subset of . We assume that is nonempty closed and convex for some with . For and with , we have Thus, is a fixed point of , which implies that ; therefore, is invariant under . Again, by Theorem 2.4, has a fixed point in , that is, By induction, . Hence, has the finite intersection property. Since is compact, Obviously, the set is closed and convex.

As a consequence of Lemma 2.1(i) and Theorem 3.2, we obtain an analog of Bruck's theorem [35].

Corollary 3.3. Let be a nonempty bounded closed and convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . Then, for any commuting family of nonexpansive mappings on , the set of common fixed points of is a nonempty nonexpansive retract of .

#### 4. Convergence Theorems

Throughout this section, stands for a complete CAT(0) space. Let be a closed convex subset of . We shall denote by the class of all asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings from into . Let , without loss of generality, we can assume that there exists a sequence of mappings such that for all ,  , and , we have Let . Again, without loss of generality, we can assume that for all , and . We define , then, for each , we have .

The following definition is a mild modification of [3, Definition  2.3].

Definition 4.1. Define as a class of all such that .
Let , and let be bounded away from 0 and 1 for all , and an increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let , and define a sequence in as

We say that the sequence in (4.4) is well defined if . As in [3], we observe that for every . Hence, we can always choose a subsequence which makes well defined.

Lemma 4.2 (see [36, Lemma  2.2]). Let and be sequences of nonnegative real numbers satisfying Then, (i) exists, (ii) if , then .

Lemma 4.3 (see [37, 38]). Suppose is a sequence in for some and , are sequences in such that ,  , and for some . Then,

Lemma 4.4. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Assume that . Then,(a)there exists a sequence in such that and ,   for all and all ,(b)there exists a constant such that ,   for all and .

Proof. (a) Let and for all . Since , we have . Now, Suppose that holds for some . Then, By induction, we have This implies This completes the proof of (a).
(b) We observe that holds for all and . Thus, by (a), for , we have The proof is complete by setting .

Theorem 4.5. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Assume that . Then, converges to some point in if and only if , where .

Proof. The necessity is obvious. Now, we prove the sufficiency. From Lemma 4.4(a), we have This implies Since , then . By Lemma 4.2(ii), we get . Next, we show that is a Cauchy sequence. From Lemma 4.4(b), there exists such that Since , for each , there exists such that Hence, there exists such that By (4.14) and (4.16), for , we have This shows that is a Cauchy sequence and so converges to some . We next show that . Let . Then, for each , there exists such that Since , there exists such that Thus, there exists such that By (4.18) and (4.20), for each , we have Since is arbitrary, we have for all . Hence, .

As an immediate consequence of Theorem 4.5, we obtain the following.

Corollary 4.6. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Assume that . Then, converges to a point if and only if there exists a subsequence of which converges to .

Definition 4.7. A strictly increasing sequence is called quasiperiodic [39] if the sequence is bounded or equivalently if there exists a number such that any block of consecutive natural numbers must contain a term of the sequence . The smallest of such numbers will be called a quasiperiod of .

Lemma 4.8. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let for some and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Then,(i) exists for all ,(ii),   for all ,(iii) if the set is quasiperiodic, then ,   for all .

Proof. (i) Follows from Lemmas 4.2(i) and 4.4(a).
(ii) Let , then, by (i), we have exists. Let By (4.9) and (4.22), we get that Note that Thus, so that From (4.23) and (4.26), we have That is for each .
We also obtain from (4.23) that By Lemma 4.3, we get that For the case , by (4.1), we have But since , then Moreover, Again, by Lemma 4.3, we get that Thus, (4.30) and (4.34) imply that For , from (ii), we have If , then we have By (ii) and , we get By (4.36) and (4.38), we have By the construction of the sequence , we have from (4.35) that Next, we show that It is enough to prove that as though . Indeed, let be a quasiperiod of , and let be given. Then, there exists such that By the quasiperiodicity of , for each , there exists such that . Without loss of generality, we can assume that (the proof for the other case is identical). Let . Then, . Since by (4.40), there exists such that This implies that By the definition of , we have
Let . Then, for , we have from (4.42), (4.44), and (4.45) that To prove that as though . Since is quasiperiodic, for each , we have From this, together with (4.39) and (4.40), we can obtain that as through .

Lemma 4.9. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of , and let . If , then for every .

Lemma 4.10. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of , and let . Suppose is a bounded sequence in such that and -. Then, .

By using Lemmas 2.3 and 4.10, we can obtain the following result. We omit the proof because it is similar to the one given in [38].

Lemma 4.11. Let be a closed convex subset of , and let be an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping. Suppose is a bounded sequence in such that and converges for each , then . Here, where the union is taken over all subsequences of . Moreover, consists of exactly one point.

Now, we are ready to prove our -convergence theorem.

Theorem 4.12. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let for some and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, -converges to a common fixed point of the family .

Proof. Let , by Lemma 4.8,   existsm and hence is bounded. Since for all , then by Lemma 4.11   for all , and hence . Since consists of exactly one point, then -converges to an element of .

Before proving our strong convergence theorem, we recall that a mapping is said to be semicompact if is closed and, for any bounded sequence in with , there exists a subsequence of and such that .

Theorem 4.13. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and such that is semicompact for some and . Let for some and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, converges to a common fixed point of the family .

Proof. By Lemma 4.8, we have Let be such that is semicompact. Thus, by Lemma 4.9, We can also find a subsequence of such that . Hence, from (4.48), we have Thus, , and, by Corollary 4.6, converges to . This completes the proof.

#### 5. Concluding Remarks

One may observe that our method can be used to obtain the analogous results for uniformly convex Banach spaces. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Banach space and fix . Define a sequence in as where ,   are sequences in for all , and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers.

Theorem 5.1. Let be a uniformly convex Banach space with the Opial property, and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let ,   for some , and let be such that in (5.1) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, converges weakly to a common fixed point of the family .

Theorem 5.2. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space and such that is semicompact for some and . Let for some , and let be such that in (5.1) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, converges strongly to a common fixed point of the family .

#### Acknowledgments

This research is (partially) supported by the Centre of Excellence in Mathematics, the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand. The first author also thanks the Graduate School of Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

#### References

1. W. A. Kirk and H.-K. Xu, “Asymptotic pointwise contractions,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 4706–4712, 2008.
2. N. Hussain and M. A. Khamsi, “On asymptotic pointwise contractions in metric spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 4423–4429, 2009.
3. W. M. Kozlowski, “Fixed point iteration processes for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 377, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2011.
4. A. R. Khan, A.-A. Domlo, and H. Fukhar-ud-din, “Common fixed points Noor iteration for a finite family of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 341, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2008.
5. M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger, Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature, vol. 319 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999.
6. W. A. Kirk, “Fixed point theorems in CAT(0) spaces and $ℝ$-trees,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, no. 4, pp. 309–316, 2004.
7. K. S. Brown, Buildings, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
8. K. Goebel and S. Reich, Uniform Convexity, Hyperbolic Geometry, and Nonexpansive Mappings, vol. 83 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
9. W. A. Kirk, “Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory,” in Seminar of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 64 of Colecc. Abierta, pp. 195–225, Universidad de Sevilla Secr. Publ., Seville, Spain, 2003.
10. W. A. Kirk, “Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory. II,” in International Conference on Fixed Point Theory and Applications, pp. 113–142, Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan, 2004.
11. S. Dhompongsa, A. Kaewkhao, and B. Panyanak, “Lim's theorems for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 478–487, 2005.
12. P. Chaoha and A. Phon-on, “A note on fixed point sets in CAT(0) spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 320, no. 2, pp. 983–987, 2006.
13. L. Leustean, “A quadratic rate of asymptotic regularity for CAT(0)-spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 325, no. 1, pp. 386–399, 2007.
14. S. Dhompongsa and B. Panyanak, “On $\mathrm{\Delta }$-convergence theorems in CAT(0) spaces,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2572–2579, 2008.
15. N. Shahzad and J. Markin, “Invariant approximations for commuting mappings in CAT(0) and hyperconvex spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 337, no. 2, pp. 1457–1464, 2008.
16. N. Shahzad, “Fixed point results for multimaps in CAT(0) spaces,” Topology and Its Applications, vol. 156, no. 5, pp. 997–1001, 2009.
17. R. Espínola and A. Fernández-León, “CAT(k)-spaces, weak convergence and fixed points,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 353, no. 1, pp. 410–427, 2009.
18. A. Razani and H. Salahifard, “Invariant approximation for CAT(0) spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2421–2425, 2010.
19. S. Saejung, “Halpern's iteration in CAT(0) spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 471781, 13 pages, 2010.
20. A. R. Khan, M. A. Khamsi, and H. Fukhar-ud-din, “Strong convergence of a general iteration scheme in CAT(0) spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 783–791, 2011.
21. S. H. Khan and M. Abbas, “Strong and $\mathrm{\Delta }$-convergence of some iterative schemes in CAT(0) spaces,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2011.
22. A. Abkar and M. Eslamian, “Common fixed point results in CAT(0) spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1835–1840, 2011.
23. M. Bestvina, “$ℝ$-trees in topology, geometry, and group theory,” in Handbook of Geometric Topology, pp. 55–91, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002.
24. C. Semple and M. Steel, Phylogenetics, vol. 24 of Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and Its Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2003.
25. R. Espínola and W. A. Kirk, “Fixed point theorems in $ℝ$-trees with applications to graph theory,” Topology and Its Applications, vol. 153, no. 7, pp. 1046–1055, 2006.
26. W. A. Kirk, “Some recent results in metric fixed point theory,” Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 195–207, 2007.
27. S. Dhompongsa, W. A. Kirk, and B. Sims, “Fixed points of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 762–772, 2006.
28. W. A. Kirk and B. Panyanak, “A concept of convergence in geodesic spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 3689–3696, 2008.
29. T. C. Lim, “Remarks on some fixed point theorems,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 60, pp. 179–182, 1976.
30. S. Dhompongsa, W. A. Kirk, and B. Panyanak, “Nonexpansive set-valued mappings in metric and Banach spaces,” Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2007.
31. W. A. Kirk, “A fixed point theorem for mappings which do not increase distances,” The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 72, pp. 1004–1006, 1965.
32. K. Goebel and W. A. Kirk, “A fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 35, pp. 171–174, 1972.
33. R. Espínola and N. Hussain, “Common fixed points for multimaps in metric spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 204981, 14 pages, 2010.
34. P. Pasom and B. Panyanak, “Common fixed points for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings,” Fixed Point Theory. to appear.
35. R. E. Bruck, Jr., “A common fixed point theorem for a commuting family of nonexpansive mappings,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 53, pp. 59–71, 1974.
36. Z.-H. Sun, “Strong convergence of an implicit iteration process for a finite family of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. 351–358, 2003.
37. M. A. Khamsi and A. R. Khan, “Inequalities in metric spaces with applications,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 4036–4045, 2011.
38. B. Nanjaras and B. Panyanak, “Demiclosed principle for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in CAT(0) spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 268780, 14 pages, 2010.
39. R. Bruck, T. Kuczumow, and S. Reich, “Convergence of iterates of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces with the uniform Opial property,” Colloquium Mathematicum, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 169–179, 1993.