Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2012, Article ID 628261, 37 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/628261
Research Article

Electromagnetic Low-Frequency Dipolar Excitation of Two Metal Spheres in a Conductive Medium

1Division of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics, Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
2Département de Recherche en Electromagnétisme, Laboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes, CNRS-Supélec-Univ Paris Sud, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Received 17 August 2011; Accepted 12 November 2011

Academic Editor: Mina Abd-El-Malek

Copyright © 2012 Panayiotis Vafeas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Björkberg and G. Kristenson, “Three–dimensional subterranean target identification by use of optimization techniques,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 15, pp. 141–164, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Yu, “Analysis of the electromagnetic inductive response of a void in a conducting-soil background,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1320–1327, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Huang and I. J. Won, “Detecting metal objects in magnetic environments using a broadband electromagnetic method,” Geophysics, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1877–1887, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. X. Chen, K. O'Neill, B. E. Barrowes, T. M. Grzegorczyk, and J. A. Kong, “Application of a spheroidal-mode approach and a differential evolution algorithm for inversion of magneto-quasistatic data in UXO discrimination,” Inverse Problems, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 527–540, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. J. Cui, A. A. Aydiner, W. C. Chew, D. L. Wright, and D. V. Smith, “Three-dimensional imaging of buried objects in very lossy earth by inversion of VETEM data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2197–2210, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Dassios and R. Kleinman, Low Frequency Scattering, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2000. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. H. Tortel, “Electromagnetic imaging of a three-dimensional perfectly conducting object using a boundary integral formulation,” Inverse Problems, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 385–398, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  8. G. Perrusson, M. Lambert, D. Lesselier, A. Charalambopoulos, and G. Dassios, “Electromagnetic scattering by a triaxial homogeneous penetrable ellipsoid: low-frequency derivation and testing of the localized nonlinear approximation,” Radio Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 463–481, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Xiong and A. C. Tripp, “Electromagnetic scattering of large structures in layered earths using integral equations,” Radio Science, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 921–929, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. L. Oristaglio and B. R. Spies, Three Dimensional Electromagnetics, SEG, Tulsa, Okla, USA, 1999.
  11. A. A. Kaufman and G. V. Keller, Inductive Mining Prospecting, Elsevier Science, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  12. B. Bourgeois, K. Suignard, and G. Perrusson, “Electric and magnetic dipoles for geometric interpretation of three-component electromagnetic data in geophysics,” Inverse Problems, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1225–1261, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics: Volume I and Volume II, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1953.
  14. E. W. Hobson, The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  15. T. M. Habashy, R. W. Groom, and B. R. Spies, “Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: a nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 1759–1775, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Perrusson, D. Lesselier, M. Lambert, B. Bourgeois, A. Charalambopoulos, and G. Dassios, “Conductive masses in a half-space earth in the diffusive regime: fast hybrid modeling of a low-contrast ellipsoid,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 38, no. 4 I, pp. 1585–1599, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Charalambopoulos, G. Dassios, G. Perrusson, and D. Lesselier, “The localized nonlinear approximation in ellipsoidal geometry: a novel approach to the low-frequency scattering problem,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 67–91, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Moon and E. Spencer, Field Theory Handbook, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 1971.
  19. G. Perrusson, D. Lesselier, P. Vafeas, G. Kamvyssas, and G. Dassios, “Low-frequency electromagnetic modeling and retrieval of simple orebodies in a conductive Earth,” in Progress in Analysis, vol. 2, pp. 1413–1422, World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  20. C. O. Ao, H. Braunisch, K. O'Neill, and J. A. Kong, “Quasi–magnetostatic solution for a conductive and permeable spheroid with arbitrary excitation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2689–2701, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. J. Bowman, P. L. Uslenghi, and T. B. Senior, Electromagnetic and Acoustic Scattering by Simple Shapes, North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1969.
  22. V. K. Varadan and V. V. Varadan, Acoustic, Electromagnetic and Elastic Wave Scattering. Low and High Frequency Asymptotics, North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987.
  23. X. Chen, K. O'Neill, T. M. Grzegorczyk, and J. A. Kong, “Spheroidal mode approach for the characterization of metallic objects using electromagnetic induction,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 697–706, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Vafeas, G. Perrusson, and D. Lesselier, “Low–frequency solution for a perfectly conducting sphere in a conductive medium with dipolar excitation,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 49, pp. 87–111, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  25. S. J. Norton, W. A. SanFilipo, and I. J. Won, “Eddy-current and current-channeling response to spheroidal anomalies,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2200–2209, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Vafeas, G. Perrusson, and D. Lesselier, “Low-frequency scattering from perfectly conducting spheroidal bodies in a conductive medium with magnetic dipole excitation,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 372–390, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  27. G. Perrusson, P. Vafeas, and D. Lesselier, “Low-frequency dipolar excitation of a perfect ellipsoidal conductor,” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 513–536, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  28. A. Charalambopoulos, G. Dassios, and M. Hadjinicolaou, “An analytic solution for low-frequency scattering by two soft spheres,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 370–386, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  29. P. C. Chaumet and J. P. Dufour, “Electric potential and field between two different spheres,” Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Dassios, M. Hadjinicolaou, G. Kamvyssas, and A. N. Kandili, “On the polarizability potential for two spheres,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 1520–1533, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH