Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2012, Article ID 824790, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/824790
Research Article

Characterization of the Equilibrium Strategy of Fuzzy Bimatrix Games Based on L-R Fuzzy Variables

School of Management, Beifang University of Nationalities, Yinchuan 750021, China

Received 25 February 2012; Accepted 30 March 2012

Academic Editor: Yonghong Yao

Copyright © 2012 Cun-lin Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. F. Nash, Jr., “Equilibrium points in n-person games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 36, pp. 48–49, 1950. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Nash, “Non-cooperative games,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 54, pp. 286–295, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  3. D. Butnariu, “Fuzzy games: a description of the concept,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 181–192, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  4. L. Campos, “Fuzzy linear programming models to solve fuzzy matrix games,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 275–289, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  5. R. Yager, “A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval,” Information Sciences, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 143–161, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  6. I. Nishizaki and M. Sakawa, Fuzzy and Multi-Objective Games for Conflict Resolution, Physica, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  7. I. Nishizaki and M. Sakawa, “Equilibrium solutions in multiobjective bimatrix games with fuzzy payoffs and fuzzy goals,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 99–116, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  8. C. R. Bector, S. Chandra, and V. Vidyottama, “Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy linear programming duality,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 255–269, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  9. C. R. Bector, S. Chandra et al., Fuzzy Mathematical Programming and Fuzzy Matrix Games, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
  10. V. Vijay and C. R. Bector, “Bi-matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy payoffs,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 3, pp. 327–344, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. V. Vijay, S. Chandra, and C. R. Bector, “Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy payoffs,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 425–429, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Takashi, “On characterization of equilibrium strategy of two-person zero-sum games with fuzzy payoffs,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 283–296, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  13. M. Takashi, “Characterization of the equilibrium strategy of the bimatrix game with fuzzy payoff,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 885–896, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  14. J. Ramík and J. Ímánek, “Inequality relation between fuzzy numbers and its use in fuzzy optimization,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  15. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning,” Information Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 199–249, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. M. Sakawa and H. Yano, “Feasibility and Pareto optimality for multiobjective nonlinear programming problems with fuzzy parameters,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH