Journal of Applied Mathematics

Journal of Applied Mathematics / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Mathematical Approaches in Advanced Control Theories

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 945240 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/945240

Robust Stability of Uncertain Systems over Network with Bounded Packet Loss

Academic Editor: Baocang Ding
Received26 Feb 2012
Revised20 Apr 2012
Accepted23 Apr 2012
Published18 Jul 2012

Abstract

This paper investigates the problem of robust stability of uncertain linear discrete-time system over network with bounded packet loss. A new Lyapunov functional is constructed. It can more fully utilize the characteristics of the packet loss; hence the established stability criterion is more effective to deal with the effect of packet loss on the stability. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness and advantage of the proposed methods.

1. Introduction

A networked control system (NCS) is a system whose feedback loop or (and) control loop is (are) connected via a communication network, which may be shared with other devices. The main advantages of NCS are low cost, reduced weight, high reliability, simple installation, and maintenance. As a result, the NCSs have been applied in many fields, such as mobile sensor networks, manufacturing systems, teleoperation of robots, and aircraft systems [1].

However, the insertion of the communication networks in control loops will bring some new problems. One of the most common problems in NCSs, especially in wireless sensor networks, is packet dropout, that is, packets can be lost due to communication noise, interference, or congestion [2]. Some results on this issue have been available. Generally, in these results there are two types of packet-loss model. One is stochastic packet loss ([2–5]; etc), another is arbitrary but bounded packet loss ([6–9]; etc.).

Here, we are concerned about the arbitrary but bounded packet loss. For this case, there are two approaches available. One approach is based on switched system theory; another one is based on the theory of time-varying-delay system. Yu et al. [7] modeled the packet-loss process as an arbitrary but finite switching signal. This enables them to apply the theory from switched systems to stabilize the NCS. However, Yu et al. [7] adopted a common Lyapunov function and the results are quadratic. Xiong and Lam [9] utilized a packet-loss-dependent Lyapunov function to establish the stabilization condition, which is less conservative than that of Yu et al. [7]. Unfortunately, however, in the stability condition of their approaches the system matrices appear in the forms of power and cross-multiplication among them. Therefore, it is difficult to deal with the systems with parametric uncertainty by using these approaches. In contrast, if utilizing the delay system approach, the system matrices are affine in the stability condition. Hence, this approach suits the uncertain systems. However, it may be very conservative if directly using the existing delay system approaches (e.g., [10–14]) to deal with the bounded packet loss. The main reason is that the existing approaches can not fully utilize the characteristic of packet loss. Therefore, for the systems in the simultaneous presence of parameter uncertainties and bounded packet loss, the problem of robust stability has not been fully investigated and remains to be challenging, which motivates the present study.

In this paper, we study the robust stability problem for uncertain discrete-time systems with bounded networked packet loss. First, we transform the packet loss into a time-varying input delay. Second, we note that the considered time-varying delay has a new characteristic. It is different with the general time-varying delay, that is, the considered time delay will change with some laws in the interval of two consecutive successful transmissions of the network, which is not possessed by general time-varying delay. In order to utilize this characteristic, we define a new Lyapunov functional. It does not only depend on the bound of the delay, but also on the rate of its change. Due to more fully utilizing the properties of the packet loss (that is the time-varying delay induced by the packet loss), the established stability criterion shows its less conservativeness. The construction of Lyapunov functional is inspired by Fridman [15], where the stability of sampled-data control systems is considered. It does not mean that the method developed in this paper is trivial. In fact, as it is shown in the Section 3 of this paper that the properties of induced-delay are more complicate than that in Fridman [15], such that the method of Fridman [15] cannot directly be applied to the problem considered in this paper. Finally, three examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed results.

2. Problem Formulation

The framework of NCSs considered in the paper is depicted in Figure 1. The plant to be controlled is modeled by linear discrete-time system: 𝑥(𝑘+1)=(𝐴+Δ𝐴)𝑥(𝑘)+(𝐵+Δ𝐵)𝑢(𝑘),(2.1) where 𝑘∈ℤ+ is the time step, 𝑥(𝑘)∈ℝ𝑛𝑥 and 𝑢(𝑘)∈ℝ𝑛𝑢 are the system state and control input, respectively. 𝑥0≜𝑥(0) is the initial state. 𝐴 and 𝐵 are known real constant matrices with appropriate dimension. Δ𝐴 and Δ𝐵 are unknown matrices describing parameter uncertainties.

In this paper, the parameter uncertainties are assumed to be of the form 𝐸Δ𝐴Δ𝐵=𝐷𝐹(𝑘)1𝐸2, where 𝐷, 𝐸1, and 𝐸2 are known real constant matrices of appropriate dimensions, and 𝐹(𝑘) is an unknown real-valued time-varying matrix satisfying 𝐹(𝑘)𝐹𝑇(𝑘)≤𝐼.

Networks exist between sensor and controller and between controller and zero-order holder (ZOH). The sensor is clock driven, the controller and ZOH are event driven and the data are transmitted in a single packet at each time step. As have been mentioned in Section 1, this paper only considers the network packet loss. Then it is assumed that there is not any network-induced delay.

Let 𝕊≜{𝑖1,𝑖2,𝑖3,…}⊂{0,1,2,3,…} denote the sequence of time points of successful data transmissions from the sensor to the zero-order hold at the actuator side and 𝑖𝑛<𝑖𝑛+1 for any 𝑛=1,2,3,….

Assumption 2.1. The number of consecutive packet loss in the network is less than 𝑚, that is 𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−1≤𝑚,∀𝑛∈{1,2,3,…}.(2.2)

Remark 2.2. Assumption 2.1 is similar to that in Liu et al. [8]. From the physical point of view, it is natural to assume that only a finite number of consecutive packet losses can be tolerated in order to avoid the NCS becoming open loop. Thus, the number of consecutive packet loss in the networks should be less than the finite number 𝑚.

The networked controller is a state-feedback controller: 𝑢=𝐾𝑥.(2.3) From the viewpoint of the ZOH, the control input is 𝑢𝑖(𝑘)=𝑢𝑛𝑖=𝐾𝑥𝑛,𝑖𝑛≤𝑘<𝑖𝑛+1.(2.4) The initial inputs are set to zero: 𝑢(𝑘)=0, 0≤𝑘<𝑖1. Hence the closed-loop system becomes 𝑥𝑖(𝑘+1)=(𝐴+Δ𝐴)𝑥(𝑘)+(𝐵+Δ𝐵)𝐾𝑥𝑛,(2.5) for 𝑘∈[𝑖𝑛,𝑖𝑛+1). The objective of this paper is to analyze the robust stability of NCS (2.5).

Remark 2.3. The packet loss process can take place in the sensor-controller link and the controller-actuator link. Since the considered controller is static in this paper, it is equivalent to incorporate the double-sided packet loss as a single-packet loss process. This is just the reason that this paper only considers the single-packet loss process. However, if the controller is on-line implemented, then one should clearly consider the double-sided packet loss rather than incorporate them as a single-packet loss process. For such case, readers can be referred to Ding [16], which systematically addressed the modeling and analysis methods for double-sided packet loss process.

3. Stability of Networked Control Systems

In this section, we analyze the stability property of NCSs. Here we firstly investigate the stability of NCS (2.5) when the plant (2.1) without any uncertainty, that is, Δ𝐴=0 and Δ𝐵=0. we have the following result.

Theorem 3.1. Assuming Δ𝐴=0 and Δ𝐵=0, NCS (2.5) with arbitrary packet-loss process is asymptotically stable if there exist matrices 𝑃>0, 𝑍>0, 𝑄1, 𝑄2, 𝑀, 𝑁, and 𝑆 such that the following LMI holds Φ1≜Ξ1+Ξ2+Îžğ‘‡2+ğ‘šî€·Îž3+Ξ5î€¸âˆ’î€·î€¸Îžğ‘š+14Φ<0,(3.1)2𝑁1∗−𝑍Φ𝑚−1<0,(3.2)3≜Ξ1+Ξ6+Îžğ‘‡6−Ξ4−1ğ‘šÎž7<0,(3.3)𝑃+Λ𝑚+11Λ𝑚+12∗Λ𝑚+13>0,(3.4) where Φ2≜Ξ1+Ξ2+Îžğ‘‡2+Ξ3+Ξ5−2Ξ4 and Ξ1=diag{𝑃,−𝑃,0},Ξ6=,Îžğ‘†âˆ’ğ‘†ğ´âˆ’ğ‘†ğµğ¾2=𝑀−𝑀𝐴+𝑁−𝑀𝐵𝐾−𝑁,Λ1=𝑄1+𝑄𝑇12,Λ2=−𝑄1+𝑄2,Λ3=𝑄1+𝑄𝑇12−𝑄2−𝑄𝑇2,Ξ3=Λ10Λ2∗00∗∗Λ3,Ξ4=000∗Λ1Λ2∗∗Λ3,Ξ5=𝑍−𝑍0∗𝑍0∗∗0,Ξ7=.000∗𝑍−𝑍∗∗𝑍(3.5)

Proof. Define 𝑑𝑘=𝑘−𝑖𝑛,𝑖𝑛≤𝑘<𝑖𝑛+1,(3.6) then the NCS (2.5) can be represented as a delay system: 𝑥(𝐾+1)=𝐴𝑥(𝐾)+𝐵𝐾𝑥𝑘−𝑑𝑘𝑖,𝑘∈𝑛,𝑖𝑛+1.(3.7) Inspired by Fridman [15], we construct the following new functional candidate as: 𝑉(𝑘)≜𝑉1(𝑘)+𝑉2(𝑘)+𝑉3(𝑘),(3.8) with 𝑉1(𝑘)=𝑥𝑇(𝑘)𝑃𝑥(𝑘) and 𝑉2𝑖(𝑘)=𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘𝑥𝑥(𝑘)ğ‘˜âˆ’ğ‘‘ğ‘˜î€¸î‚¹ğ‘‡Ã—âŽ¡âŽ¢âŽ¢âŽ¢âŽ£ğ‘„1+𝑄𝑇12−𝑄1+𝑄2∗𝑄1+𝑄𝑇12−𝑄2−𝑄𝑇2âŽ¤âŽ¥âŽ¥âŽ¥âŽ¦î‚¸ğ‘¥î€·ğ‘¥(𝑘)𝑘−𝑑𝑘,𝑉3𝑖(𝑘)=𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘𝑘−1𝑖=𝑘−𝑑𝑘𝜂𝑇(𝑖)𝑍𝜂(𝑖),(3.9) where 𝜂(𝑖)=𝑥(𝑖+1)−𝑥(𝑖) and 𝑃>0, 𝑍>0, 𝑄1, 𝑄2 are to be determined.
From (2.2) and (3.6), we know that 𝑑𝑘≤𝑚. Therefore, similar with the discussion of Fridman [15], it can be seen that (3.4) guarantees (3.8) to be a Lyapunov functional. For 𝑘∈[𝑖𝑛,𝑖𝑛+1), we, respectively, calculate the forward difference of the functional (3.8) along the solution of system (3.7) by two cases.
Case 1  (𝑖𝑛≤𝑘<𝑖𝑛+1−1). In this case, we have 𝑑𝑘+1=𝑑𝑘+1. Then, Δ𝑉1(𝑘)=𝑥𝑇(𝑘+1)𝑃𝑥(𝑘+1)−𝑥𝑇(𝑘)𝑃𝑥(𝑘),(3.10)Δ𝑉2𝑖(𝑘)=𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘𝜉−1𝑇(𝑘)Ξ3−𝑖𝜉(𝑘)𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘𝜉𝑇(𝑘)Ξ4𝜉(𝑘),Δ𝑉3𝑖(𝑘)=𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘[]−1𝑥(𝑘+1)−𝑥(𝑘)𝑇[]−×𝑍𝑥(𝑘+1)−𝑥(𝑘)𝑘−1∑𝑖=𝑘−𝑑𝑘𝜂𝑇(𝑖)𝑍𝜂(𝑖),(3.11) where 𝜉(𝑘)=[𝑥(𝑘+1)𝑇𝑥(𝑘)𝑇𝑥(𝑘−𝑑𝑘)𝑇]𝑇.
In addition, for any appropriately dimensioned matrices 𝑀 and 𝑁 the following relationships always hold: 0=2𝜉𝑇𝑥(𝑘)M(𝑘+1)−𝐴𝑥(𝑘)−𝐵𝐾𝑥𝑘−𝑑𝑘,(3.12)0≤2𝜉𝑇(𝑘)𝑁𝑥(𝑘)−𝑥𝑘−𝑑𝑘,+𝑑𝑘𝜉𝑇(𝑘)𝑁𝑍−1𝑁𝑇𝜉(𝑘)+𝑘−1𝑖=𝑘−𝑑𝑘𝜂𝑇(𝑖)𝑍𝜂(𝑖).(3.13) Then, from (3.10)–(3.13), we have Δ𝑉(𝑘)≤𝜉𝑇(𝑘)Ω𝜉(𝑘),(3.14) where Ω=Ξ1+Ξ2+Îžğ‘‡2+(𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘−1)(Ξ3+Ξ5)−(𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘)Ξ4+𝑑𝑘𝑁𝑍−1𝑁𝑇.
Now we prove (3.1) and (3.2) guaranteeing that Ω<0. By Schur complement, (3.2) is equivalent to Φ2≜Φ2+𝑚−1𝑁𝑍−1𝑁𝑇<0.(3.15) Then from (3.1) and (3.15), we know that Φ1<0 and Φ2<0. Hence for any scalar 𝛼∈[0,1], the following inequality holds: 𝛼Φ1+(1−𝛼)Φ2<0.(3.16) Noting that in this case 0≤𝑑𝑘≤𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−2, then we have 0≤𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−2−𝑑𝑘≤𝑚−1. Therefore, 0≤(𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘−2)/(𝑚−1)≤1. By setting 𝛼=(𝑖(𝑛+1)−𝑖𝑛−𝑑𝑘−2)/(𝑚−1), from (3.16) we obtain that Ω+(𝑚−(𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−1))𝑁𝑍−1𝑁𝑇<0. Due to 𝑚−(𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−1)≥0, the inequality above implies Ω<0 holds. Therefore, in this case Δ𝑉(𝑘)<0 holds.
Case 2  (𝑘=𝑖𝑛+1−1). In this case, we have 𝑑𝑘=𝑖𝑛+1−𝑖𝑛−1 and 𝑑𝑘+1=0. The Δ𝑉1(𝑘)=𝑥𝑇(𝑘+1)𝑃𝑥(𝑘+1)−𝑥𝑇(𝑘)𝑃𝑥(𝑘),(3.17)Δ𝑉2(𝑘)=−𝜉𝑇(𝑘)Ξ4𝜉(𝑘),Δ𝑉3(𝑘)=−𝑘−1𝑖=𝑘−𝑑𝑘𝜂𝑇(𝑖)𝑍𝜂(𝑖).(3.18) By the Jensen's inequality [17], we have −𝑘−1𝑖=𝑘−𝑑𝑘𝜂𝑇1(𝑖)𝑍𝜂(𝑖)≤−𝑚𝑥(𝑘)−𝑥𝑘−𝑑𝑘𝑇𝑍𝑥(𝑘)−𝑥𝑘−𝑑𝑘.(3.19) In addition, for any appropriately dimensioned matrix 𝑆 the following relationship always holds: 0=2𝜉𝑇𝑥(𝑘)𝑆(𝑘+1)−𝐴𝑥(𝑘)−𝐵𝐾𝑥𝑘−𝑑𝑘.(3.20) Then, from (3.17)–(3.20), we have Δ𝑉(𝑘)â‰¤ğœ‰ğ‘‡î‚ƒÎž(𝑘)1+Ξ6+Îžğ‘‡6−Ξ4−1ğ‘šÎž7𝜉𝑇(𝑘).(3.21) In this case, we can see that (3.3) guarantees Δ𝑉(𝑘)<0.
From both Cases 1 and 2, we can conclude Δ𝑉(𝑘)<0 for 𝑘∈[𝑖𝑛,𝑖𝑛+1), for all 𝑛∈{1,2,3,…}. Then, from the Lyapunov stability theory, the NCS (2.5) with arbitrary packet-loss process satisfying (2.2) is asymptotically stable.

Remark 3.2. The proposed stability criterion in Theorem 3.1 is dependent on the bound of the packet loss. Furthermore, from the proof of Theorem 3.1, we can see that the varying rate of packet-loss-induced delays is fully utilized to obtain the stability condition. According to the difference of induced delays' varying rates, we separate 𝑘∈[𝑖𝑛,𝑖𝑛+1) into two parts, that is 𝑖𝑛≤𝑘<𝑖𝑛+1−1 and 𝑘=𝑖𝑛+1−1. For the two cases, we, respectively, calculate the forward difference of the functional and guarantee it less than zero, such that the NCS is asymptotically stable. Theorem 3.1 is more effective to deal with packet loss than the existing time-varying delay system approaches in the sense that Theorem 3.1 can allow a larger upper bound of the packet loss, which will be demonstrated in an example in next section.

Remark 3.3. In Fridman [15], the continuous-time sampled control system is considered. The varying rate of sampling-induced delays is constant when the derivative of the Lyapunov functional is calculated. However, in our paper, the varying rate of packet-loss-induced delays will be changing when the difference of the Lyapunov functional is calculated. Therefore, the method of Fridman [15] for continuous-time domain cannot directly be applied to the problem of discrete-time domain considered in this paper.
Note that in LMIs (3.1)–(3.3) the system matrices 𝐴 and 𝐵 appear in affine form, thus the stability condition presented in Theorem 3.1 can be readily extended to cope with uncertain systems (2.1). By using Theorem 3.4 and the well-known 𝑆-procedure, we can easily obtain the following theorem, and hence its proof is omitted.

Theorem 3.4. NCS (2.5) is robustly asymptotically if there exist matrices 𝑃>0, 𝑍>0, 𝑄1, 𝑄2, 𝑀, 𝑁, 𝑆 and scalar 𝜀1, 𝜀2, 𝜀3 satisfying (3.4) and the following LMIs: Φ1𝑀𝐷𝜀1Π𝑇∗−𝜀1𝐼0∗∗−𝜀1𝐼Φ<0,3𝑆𝐷𝜀3Π𝑇∗−𝜀3𝐼0∗∗−𝜀3ğ¼îƒ­âŽ¡âŽ¢âŽ¢âŽ¢âŽ¢âŽ£î‚Î¦<0,2𝑁𝑀𝐷𝜀2Π𝑇1∗−𝑚−1𝑍00∗∗−𝜀2𝐼0∗∗∗−𝜀2𝐼⎤⎥⎥⎥⎥⎦<0,(3.22) where Φ1, Φ2, Φ3 are given in (3.5) and Π=0−𝐸1−𝐸2𝐾.

Remark 3.5. Because the LMIs of Theorem 3.1 are affine in the system matrices 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is readily extended to deal with the systems with norm-bounded parameter uncertainty (i.e., Theorem 3.4). With similar reason it can also be easily extended to deal with the systems with polytopic-type uncertainty. The reason why we only consider one of the cases is to avoid the paper being too miscellaneous.

Remark 3.6. It is worth to reiterate that if there is only packet loss, the method of this paper is more suitable than the general time-delay method. However, if there simultaneously exist network-induced delay and packet loss, the method of this paper is not applicable, but the general time-delay method is still valid. For example, Yue et al. [18], Gao and Chen [19], and Huang and Nguang [20] considered the networked control systems with both network-induced delay and packet loss, where Yue et al. [18] and Gao and Chen [19] are the methods of continuous-time domain, Huang and Nguang [20] is the method of discrete-time domain. Yue et al. [18] investigated the ğ»âˆž regulating control for network-based uncertain systems. Gao and Chen [19] studied the ğ»âˆž output tracking control for network-based uncertain systems. For the uncertain networked control system with random time delays, Huang and Nguang [20] analyzed robust disturbance attenuation performance and proposed the corresponding design method for the controllers.

4. Numerical Examples

In this section, three examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness and advantage of the proposed stability results.

Example 4.1. Borrow the system considered by Gao and Chen [10], where Δ𝐴=0, Δ𝐵=0 and 𝐴=1.00780.03010.52021.0078,𝐵=−0.0001−0.0053.(4.1)
Here we are interested in the allowable maximum bound of dropout loss that guarantees the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system. For extensive comparison purpose, we let the controller gain matrices take two different values: 𝐾1=105.204725.3432 and 𝐾2=110.682734.6980. By using different methods, the calculated results are presented in Table 1. From the table, it is easy to see that the method proposed in this paper is more effective than the others. But it is never to say that the proposed method in this paper is more suitable to deal with the time-delay; it is only to show that the proposed method is more suitable to deal with the packet-loss than the general time-delay methods.


Controller gain matrix 𝐾 = 𝐾 1 𝐾 = 𝐾 2

[10, Theorem 1] 7 5
[11, Theorem 1] 6 5
[12, Theorem 1] 6 4
[13, Theorem 1] 7 5
Theorem 3.1 in this paper 1 3 1 0

Example 4.2. Borrow the system considered by Wang et al. [14], where Δ𝐴=0, Δ𝐵=0 and ⎡⎢⎢⎣⎤⎥⎥⎦⎡⎢⎢⎣⎤⎥⎥⎦,.𝐴=10.010001000010.010001,𝐵=000.0100000.01𝐾=−0.0166−0.22480.00060.00160.00040.0016−0.0165−0.2271(4.2)
When lower bound of the equivalent delay is 0, the allowable maximum upper bound of the equivalent delay is 13 as reported in Wang et al. [14]. Therefore, if there is only bounded packet loss, by using the method of Wang et al. [14], the allowable maximum bound of dropout loss is 13. However, by using Theorem 3.1 of this paper, one can obtain that the allowable maximum bound of dropout loss is 190. This example shows again that the proposed method is more suitable to deal with the packet-loss than the general time-delay methods.

Example 4.3. Consider the following uncertain system: 𝑥(𝑘+1)=1.0078+𝛼(𝑘)0.03010.52021.0078𝑥(𝑘)+−0.1−5.3+𝛼(𝑘)𝑢(𝑘),(4.3) where |𝛼(𝑘)|≤𝛼. The system matrices can be written in the form of (2.1) with matrices given by 𝐴=1.00780.03010.52021.0078,𝐵=−0.1−5.3,𝐷=𝐸𝛼,1=1000,𝐸2=01,𝐹(𝑘)=𝛼(𝑘)𝛼.(4.4) Now assume that the controller gain matrix is 𝐾=0.10520.0253, and our purpose is to determine the upper value of 𝛼 such that the closed-loop system is robustly stable. By using Theorem 3.4, the detail calculated result is shown in Table 2.
In the following, we will present some simulation results. Assume the initial condition to be 𝑥(𝑘)=[1−1]𝑇 for 𝑘≤0. Let 𝛼(𝑘) changes randomly between −0.0027 and 0.0027, which is shown in Figure 2(a). In addition, let the upper of dropout loss is 13, which is shown in Figure 2(b). Then, the state response of the close-loop system is given in Figure 2(c). It can be seen from this figure that the system is robustly asymptotically stable, which shows the validity of the method proposed in this paper.


− 𝑚 3 5 7 9 11 13

Upper value of − 𝛼 0 . 0 1 0 5 0 . 0 1 0 4 0 . 0 1 0 1 0 . 0 0 9 6 0 . 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 2 7

5. Conclusions

The problem of robust stability analysis for uncertain systems over network with bounded packet loss has been considered in this paper. A new Lyapunov functional is constructed. This Lyapunov functional not only utilizes the bound of the packet loss but also utilizes the varying rate of the packet-loss-induced delays, which aims at reducing the conservatism of the results. Numerical examples are also presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of the proposed approach.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61104115 and 60904053), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20110072120018), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. G. C. Walsh, H. Ye, and L. G. Bushnell, “Stability analysis of networked control systems,” IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 438–446, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  2. L. Schenato, “To zero or to hold control inputs with lossy links?” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1093–1099, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. O. C. Imer, S. Yüksel, and T. Başar, “Optimal control of LTI systems over unreliable communication links,” Automatica, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1429–1439, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  4. B. Sinopoli, L. Schenato, M. Franceschetti, K. Poolla, M. I. Jordan, and S. S. Sastry, “Kalman filtering with intermittent observations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1453–1464, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Hu and W.-Y. Yan, “Stability robustness of networked control systems with respect to packet loss,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1243–1248, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  6. G.-P. Liu, J. X. Mu, D. Rees, and S. C. Chai, “Design and stability analysis of networked control systems with random communication time delay using the modified MPC,” International Journal of Control, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 288–297, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  7. M. Yu, L. Wang, T. Chu, and G. Xie, “Stabilization of networked control systems with data packet dropout and network delays via switching system approach,” in Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3539–3544, Atlantis, Bahamas, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G.-P. Liu, Y. Xia, J. Chen, D. Rees, and W. Hu, “Networked predictive control of systems with random network delays in both forward and feedback channels,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1282–1297, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. Xiong and J. Lam, “Stabilization of linear systems over networks with bounded packet loss,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  10. H. Gao and T. Chen, “New results on stability of discrete-time systems with time-varying state delay,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 328–334, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. Zhang, S. Xu, and Y. Zou, “Improved stability criterion and its applications in delayed controller design for discrete-time systems,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2963–2967, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  12. J. Xiong and J. Lam, “Stabilization of networked control systems with a logic ZOH,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 358–363, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X. Meng, J. Lam, B. Du, and H. Gao, “A delay-partitioning approach to the stability analysis of discrete-time systems,” Automatica, vol. 46, pp. 610–614, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. Wang, C. Han, and B. Ding, “Stability of discrete-time networked control systems and its extension for robust H control,” International Journal of Systems Science. In press. View at: Publisher Site | H∞%20control&author=P. Wang&author=C. Han&author=&author=B. Ding" target="_blank">Google Scholar
  15. E. Fridman, “A refined input delay approach to sampled-data control,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 421–427, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  16. B. Ding, “Stabilization of linear systems over networks with bounded packet loss and its use in model predictive control,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2526–2533, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  17. K. Gu, “An integral inequality in the stability problem of time-delay systems,” in Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2805–2810, Sydney, Australia, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  18. D. Yue, Q.-L. Han, and J. Lam, “Network-based robust H control of systems with uncertainty,” Automatica, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 999–1007, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | H∞%20control%20of%20systems%20with%20uncertainty&author=D. Yue&author=Q.-L. Han&author=&author=J. Lam&publication_year=2005" target="_blank">Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  19. H. Gao and T. Chen, “Network-based H output tracking control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 655–667, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | H∞%20output%20tracking%20control&author=H. Gao &author=T. Chen&publication_year=2008" target="_blank">Google Scholar
  20. D. Huang and S. K. Nguang, “Robust disturbance attenuation for uncertain networked control systems with random time delays,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1008–1023, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Yafeng Guo and Tianhong Pan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

855 Views | 498 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder