Research Article
Uncertainty Analysis of Multiple Hydrologic Models Using the Bayesian Model Averaging Method
Table 1
Results of BMA
and its 3 individual models in the mean prediction as well as 90% uncertainty interval for the whole flow series.
| Models | Mean prediction | 90% uncertainty interval | (%) | DRMS | RE (%) | CR (%) | (m3/s) | D (m3/s) |
| Calibration period: | XAJ | 88.69 | 30.77 | 21.04 | 24.83 | 31.41 | 16.69 | SMAR | 87.69 | 32.11 | 16.21 | 32.83 | 32.80 | 17.21 | SIM | 80.73 | 40.17 | 31.51 | 14.83 | 27.38 | 22.33 | BMA | 90.68 | 27.92 | 27.87 | 40.72 | 43.76 | 16.06 |
| Validation period: | XAJ | 85.77 | 29.22 | 17.79 | 24.28 | 24.66 | 14.09 | SMAR | 85.30 | 29.70 | 14.19 | 31.91 | 25.52 | 14.56 | SIM | 69.81 | 42.56 | 39.48 | 14.33 | 18.40 | 20.07 | BMA | 86.98 | 27.95 | 30.72 | 40.65 | 36.71 | 14.13 |
|
|
Note: bolded values represent the best results.
|