Journal of Applied Mathematics

Journal of Applied Mathematics / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Modeling and Control of Complex Dynamic Systems 2013

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 548375 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/548375

Shi Miao, Li Junmin, "Distributed Adaptive Synchronization for Complex Dynamical Networks with Uncertain Nonlinear Neutral-Type Coupling", Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 548375, 12 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/548375

Distributed Adaptive Synchronization for Complex Dynamical Networks with Uncertain Nonlinear Neutral-Type Coupling

Academic Editor: Zhiwei Gao
Received10 Jul 2013
Revised23 Aug 2013
Accepted28 Aug 2013
Published29 Oct 2013

Abstract

Distributed adaptive synchronization control for complex dynamical networks with nonlinear derivative coupling is proposed. The distributed adaptive strategies are constituted by directed connections among nodes. By means of the parameters separation, the nonlinear functions can be transformed into the linearly form. Then effective distributed adaptive techniques are designed to eliminate the effect of time-varying parameters and made the considered network synchronize a given trajectory in the sense of square error norm. Furthermore, the coupling matrix is not assumed to be symmetric or irreducible. An example shows the applicability and feasibility of the approach.

1. Introduction

A complex network is a large set of interconnected nodes, where the nodes represent individuals in the graph and the edges represent the connections among them, such as climate system [1], biological neural networks [2], human brain system [3]. Many natural and man-made systems can be modeled and characterized by complex networks successfully [4]. Such systems may be characterized by a system with uncertainties, time delays, nonlinearity, neutral properties, hybrid dynamics, distributed dynamics and chaotic dynamics.

Synchronization phenomena has been found in different forms in complex networks, such as fireflies in the forest, description of hearts, and routing messages in the internet. Thus synchronization is one of meaningful issues in dynamical characteristics of the complex dynamical networks. A considerable number of papers on this topic have appeared (see [57] and references therein.)

Recently, various control techniques have been reported to achieve networks synchronization (see [4, 816] and references therein) Some control schemes [813] were based on a solution of the homogenous system, in which it may be difficult to obtain the state information of an isolated node. Consequently, utilizing the information from neighborhood to realize the network synchronization is more reasonable. Paper [17] introduced the concept of control topology to describe the whole controller structure. In [18], based on local information of node dynamics, an effective distributed adaptive strategy was designed to tune the coupling weights of a network. A considerable number of controlled synchronization techniques have been derived for complex dynamic networks based on the assumption which is the coupled nodes of CDN with the same dynamics (see the above papers and the references therein). In reality, complex networks are more likely to have different nodes for different dynamics. For example, in a multi-robot system, the robots can have distinct dynamic structures or different parameters. Recently, special attention has been focused on the synchronization of complex dynamical networks with nonidentical nodes [1922]. Paper [20] investigated the synchronization problem of a complex network with nonidentical nodes via open-loop controllers. The paper [22] considered nonlinearly coupled networks with non-identical nodes and designed pinning control to obtain synchronization criteria. On the other hand, many real-world network systems’ structure will change over time and contain unknown parameters. Very recently, some papers studied complex networks with unknown time-varying coupling strength [2326]. In these results, non-identical nodes were not considered. Only in [21], the time-varying complex network with non-identical nodes was investigated, and a criterion of global bounded synchronization of the maximum state deviation between nodes was developed.

In other aspects, new complex networks models are proposed to reflect the complexity from the network structure. Thus, the problem of neutral-type couplings has also been widely investigated [2731]. However, in the above studies, only linear derivative coupling is considered. More recently, [32] studied the synchronization in a class of dynamical networks with distributed delays and nonlinear derivative coupling. Considering the preceding discussion, non-identical nodes complex dynamic network with nonlinear derivative coupling, and time-varying coupling strength is not concerned yet.

Inspired by the aforementioned results, the problem of adaptive synchronization is studied for complex dynamical networks with non-identical nodes, nonlinearly derivative couplings, and unknown time-varying coupling strength. A prominent feature of this network is that its complexity originates not only from the nonlinear dynamics of the nodes, but also from the complex coupling strength. The difficulty in dealing with the nonlinearly derivative couplings with unknown time-varying parameters is solved by using the parameter separation method. The distributed adaptive learning laws of periodically time-varying and constant parameters and the distributed adaptive controllers are constructed to guarantee that the system is asymptotically stable and that all closed loop signals are bounded.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. The problem statement and preliminaries are given in Section 2. Section 3 gives the main results and proofs. In Section 4, an illustrative example is provided to verify the theoretical results. Finally, conclusion is given.

2. Problem Statement and Preliminaries

The complex dynamical network is described as where is the state vector of the th node, is a vector-valued continuous function, and are unknown continuous nonlinear vector-valued functions, , represent the unknown time-varying functions, the inner-coupling matrix is positive definite. and are the coupling configuration matrices, which satisfying and defined as follows: if there is a connection between node and node , then , , otherwise, .

Remark 1. It should be pointed out that the nonlinear derivative couplings consist of more information in CDN than the linear derivative couplings in [28], the challenge problem in (1) is due to the uncertain nonlinear neutral-type coupling . For the unknown parameter and the nonlinear function , in this paper, we shall overcome the obstacle though the domination technique and the parameters separation principle. Under later assumption, we can “separate” the parameters from the nonlinear function.
Define synchronization error as where is a solution of the dynamics of the isolated node to which all are expected to synchronize.
Then, (1) is said to be asymptotic synchronization in the norm sense if and the system (1) is said to be globally asymptotically synchronized onto state if
To achieve the control objective in (3) and (4), we need an adaptive control strategy to nodes in network (1). Then, the controlled network is given by where , , are the adaptive controllers to be designed. Since the row sum of coupling matrix is zero, it is easily obtained that , which implies the dynamical error equations as
Our objective is to design a distributed adaptive control law so as to obtain the convergence of the synchronization errors.
In order to derive the main results, the following assumptions and lemmas are introduced.

Assumption 2 (Lipschits condition). For the system (1), there exist positive constants such that

Remark 3. For many well-known systems, such as Lorenz’s system, Chen’s system, and Lü’s system, the above condition is satisfied.

Assumption 4 (see [33]). For the unknown continuous functions , the following inequality holds: where is an known nonnegative continuous function is a unknown nonnegative continuous function, or is an unknown nonnegative continuous function matrix.

Remark 5. It is well known that the estimation of unknown nonlinear parameters in the systems is a difficult problem. In this paper, we separate the unknown parameters from the nonlinear function in (8), according to the separation principle in [33]; thus, Assumption 4 is reasonable and easily obtained. By using Assumption 4, we are able to solve the synchronization problem for a class of nonlinearly parameterized systems with nonlinear derivative couplings.

Assumption 6. In the given networks in (1), , are unknown time-varying periodic functions with a known period .

From Assumption 6, it is easy to see that and each element in are periodic functions with the same period . Suppose where is an unknown continuous periodic function with a known period and is an unknown constant parameter.

Assumption 7. In network (1), the inner coupling matrix and satisfies where , are positive constants.

Assumption 8. Assume that the state and the state derivative of system (1) are measurable.

Remark 9. This assumption is necessary to design controller and adaptive laws. Assumption 8 seems to be restrictive. The observer for state derivative will be considered in the near future.

Lemma 10 (Young’s inequality). For vectors , , and any positive constant , the following matrix inequality holds:

Lemma 11. For any vectors , , according to the properties of matrix trace, the following equality holds:

Lemma 12 (Barbalat’s Lemma [34]). If and , then , where and .

Lemma 13. For a positive constant , if , is a continuous function and exists and is bounded with . Then, is bounded.

Proof. In fact, if is unbounded, we can get ,  ,  . As is continuous function, according to the properties of the continuous functions, we have ,  ; then . We can choose ; then ; this is a contradiction with the assumption. The proof is completed.

3. Adaptive Synchronization of the Complex Dynamical Networks

In this section, distributed adaptive controller and distributed adaptive laws are designed to control the given system to synchronize the given trajectory , and the synchronization process is proved.

Considering the controlled networks, we design the controller by where , satisfy condition (10), is the node number, and , and  , are used to estimate , , . .

The constant parameter distributed update law is designed as follows: and the time-varying distributed periodic adaptive learning laws as where , and are positive constants and , are continuous and strictly increasing nonnegative functions satisfying , , and , which ensure that are continuous in , , .

The following theorem will give a sufficient condition for the controlled network in (5) to be asymptotical synchronization.

Theorem 14. Under Assumptions 27, the control law (13) with the adaptive learning laws (14)–(16) guarantees the controlled networks in (5) achieve asymptotic synchronization in the norm sense. All closed-loop signals are bounded. Furthermore, if is bounded function, we can obtain globally asymptotical synchronization.

Proof. Define a Lyapunov-Krasovskii-like function as follows: where , , , and is a sufficiently large positive constant which will be determined later.
It should be noted that we define ,    ; then, from the adaptive laws (15) and (16), we get
Firstly, the finiteness property of for the period is given.
Consider the system (6) and the proposed control laws (14)–(16); it can be seen that the right-hand side of (6) is continuous with respect to all arguments. According to the existence theorem of differential equation, (6) has unique solution in the interval with . This can guarantee the boundedness of over . Therefore, we need only focus in the interval .
The derivative of with respect to time is given by
Let us introduce some notations as
From (6) and (13), the first term on the right hand side of (19) satisfies
According to Assumptions 27 and Lemma 10, from the above equation, we get where , are positive constants. Choosing , , and according to Lemma 11, we have
Applying (14), the third term on the right-hand side of (19) satisfies
Let us focus on the second and fourth terms on the right-hand side of (19). In the interval , since are continuous and strictly increasing functions, , are ensured, we obtain
According to Lemma 11, we can get
Then from (26), the last term on the right-hand side of (19) satisfies
Substituting (23)–(27) into (19) we obtain It is obvious that there exist sufficiently large positive constants such that According to (28) we have
For , since is continuous and periodic and every element in matrix is continuous function, the boundedness of them can be obtained. The boundedness of and leads to the boundedness of . That is, is bounded in . For is bounded, the finiteness of is obvious by using integral technique, .
Next step, the asymptotical convergence of is proved.
According to (17), , we can get
With Newton-Leibniz’s formula, the first two terms on the right-hand side of (31) satisfied
Using the algebraic relation where , , , .
After choosing ,  , , , , , and , we can get
From Lemma 11, we have
According to (34) and (35), the last two terms on the right-hand side of (31) satisfy
The other terms of right-hand side of (31) can be simplified as follows:
Substituting (32) and (36)–(38) into (31), we can attain
Choosing , we can obtain
For any ,  and denoting , we have
Considering and the positive of , according to (41), we obtain
Since is bounded in the interval , according to the convergence theorem of the sum of series and (42), the error converges to zero asymptotically in norm. That is to say, we have
Finally, we prove that all the closed-loop signals are bounded. Considering , the derivative of is
Having the two sides of (44) integration, one can obtain
Choosing , we have
From the boundedness of and (17), we can conclude that , For is constant and are all bounded., it implies the boundedness of . According to Lemma 13 and the continuity of and , the boundedness of and are obviously obtained. As is a continuous periodic function and is continuous periodic matrix, we can get that are bounded. According to (1), the boundedness of the control input is obtained. Since is bounded, the boundedness of is received. The proof is completed.

It is worth mentioning that when is bounded function, the boundedness of can be easy to get. Then, from Lemma 12 we can obtain the error globally asymptotical synchronization.

4. Simulation Example

To demonstrate the theoretical result obtained in Section 3, the following dynamical network with six non-identical nodes is considered: where

Nonlinearly parameterized function satisfies

We choose , and the parameters are selected as follows:

In the following simulations, we choose

The initially estimated values of the unknown parameters are and the initial states are chosen as

According to Theorem 14, the synchronization of the complex dynamical network can be guaranteed by the distributed adaptive controllers in (15) and the distributed adaptive learning laws when (16)–(18). Figure 1 shows the error evolutions under the designed controller. In this example, is bounded function, we clearly see that the states of the network asymptotically synchronizes with the states of the desired orbit. Figure 2 depicts the time evolution of the controller, and Figure 3 shows the evolution of the estimated time-varying parameters. Figures 2 and 3 show that all signals in the network are bounded. Figures 4 and 5 show that the time-varying parameters are periodic and bounded.

Remark 15. It is not difficult to draw the evolution of other elements in parameter . Here, we only take the first row of for example. Compared with existing results [26, 28], the biggest innovation of this paper is the asymptotical synchronization ability for the nonlinear neutral-type coupling complex networks under the designed controller.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, the synchronization problem for a complex dynamical network with nonlinearly derivative couplings is solved via distributed adaptive control method. The adaptive strategies are concerned with the networks topology. By combining inequality techniques and the parameter separation, introducing the composite energy function, the convergence of the tracking error and the boundedness of the system signals are derived. Moreover, the coupling matrix is not assumed to be symmetric or irreducible. Finally, a typical example was simulated to verify the proposed theoretical results.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. J. F. Donges, Y. Zou, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, “The backbone of the climate network,” EPL, vol. 87, no. 4, Article ID 48007, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Pastor-Satorras, E. Smith, and R. V. Solé, “Evolving protein interaction networks through gene duplication,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  3. M. Chavez, M. Valencia, V. Navarro, V. Latora, and J. Martinerie, “Functional modularity of background activities in normal and epileptic brain networks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 11, Article ID 118701, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. W. Gao, D. X. Kong, and C. H. Gao, “Modeling and control of complex dynamic systems: applied mathematical aspects,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2012, Article ID 869792, 5 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Chen, X. Wang, X. Li, and J. Lü, “Some recent advances in complex networks synchronization,” Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 254, pp. 3–16, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. Song, J. H. Park, Z. G. Wu, and Y. Zhang, “Global synchronization of stochastic delayed complex networks,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2389–2399, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  7. Z. G. Wu, J. H. Park, H. Su, B. Song, and J. Chu, “Exponential synchronization for complex dynamical networks with sampled-data,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 349, no. 9, pp. 2735–2749, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  8. K. Yuan, J. D. Cao, and S. M. Fei, “Synchronization of coupled networks with mixed delays by intermittent control,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2012, Article ID 927609, 13 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. H. Lee, J. H. Park, D. H. Ji, O. M. Kwon, and S. M. Lee, “Guaranteed cost synchronization of a complex dynamical network via dynamic feedback control,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 11, pp. 6469–6481, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  10. T. Chen, X. Liu, and W. Lu, “Pinning complex networks by a single controller,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1317–1326, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. J. Zhou, J. A. Lu, and J. Lü, “Pinning adaptive synchronization of a general complex dynamical network,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 996–1003, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  12. M. Porfiri and M. di Bernardo, “Criteria for global pinning-controllability of complex networks,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 3100–3106, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  13. D. H. Ji, S. C. Jeong, J. H. Park, S. M. Lee, and S. C. Won, “Adaptive lag synchronization for uncertain complex dynamical network with delayed coupling,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 9, pp. 4872–4880, 2012. View at: Publisher Site |