Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 563650, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/563650
Research Article

Uncertain Linguistic Aggregation Distance Measures and Their Application to Group Decision Making

1College of Mathematics and Statistics, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China
2College of Computer and Information, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, China

Received 3 April 2013; Accepted 10 July 2013

Academic Editor: Luca Formaggia

Copyright © 2013 Wei Li and Shouzhen Zeng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Gil-Aluja, Elements for a Theory of Decision in Uncertainty, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. B. B. Chaudhuri and A. Rosenfeld, “A modified Hausdorff distance between fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 118, no. 1–4, pp. 159–171, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “Induced aggregation operators in the Euclidean distance and its application in financial decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 7603–7608, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 505–518, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. N. B. Karayiannis, “Soft learning vector quantization and clustering algorithms based on ordered weighted aggregation operators,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1093–1105, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Kaufmann, Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  7. M. Izadikhah, “Using the Hamming distance to extend TOPSIS in a fuzzy environment,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 200–207, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. Z. Xu, “Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Xu, “An approach to pure linguistic multiple attribute decision making under uncertainty,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 2128–2138, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. R. W. Hamming, “Error detecting and error correcting codes,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 29, pp. 147–160, 1950. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183–190, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. Z. Xu and J. Chen, “Ordered weighted distance measure,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 432–445, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. R. Yager, “Norms induced from oWA operators,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Merigó and A. M. Gil-Lafuente, “New decision-making techniques and their application in the selection of financial products,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 11, pp. 2085–2094, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. S. Z. Zeng and W. H. Su, “Intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted distance operator,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1224–1232, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. S. Z. Zeng, “Some intuitionistic fuzzy weighted distance measures and their application to group decision making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 281–298, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Z. S. Xu, “Fuzzy ordered distance measures,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 73–97, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “Induced and heavy aggregation operators with distance measures,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 431–439, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “Decision making with distance measures and induced aggregation operators,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 66–76, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “Decision making with distance measures and linguistic aggregation operators,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 190–198, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “A new Minkowski distance based on induced aggregation operators,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  24. F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 144–161, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. G.-W. Wei, “Uncertain linguistic hybrid geometric mean operator and its application to group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 251–267, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. Z. S. Xu, “Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment,” Information Sciences, vol. 168, no. 1–4, pp. 171–184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Xu, “An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 488–499, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Z. Xu, “An interactive approach to multiple attribute group decision making with multigranular uncertain linguistic information,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–145, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. S. Ahn, “Some remarks on the LSOWA approach for obtaining OWA operator weights,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1265–1279, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Y. Chen and L. G. Zhou, “An approach to group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on induced generalized continuous ordered weighted averaging operator,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 13432–13440, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. X. Liu, “A general model of parameterized OWA aggregation with given orness level,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 598–627, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. X. Liu and S. Han, “Orness and parameterized RIM quantifier aggregation with OWA operators: a summary,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 77–97, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “The uncertain induced quasi-arithmetic OWA operator,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. M. Merigó and A. M. Gil-Lafuente, “The induced generalized OWA operator,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 6, pp. 729–741, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. G. W. Wei, “Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 423–431, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G.-W. Wei, “FIOWHM operator and its application to multiple attribute group decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2984–2989, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Z. S. Xu, “An overview of methods for determining OWA weights,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 843–865, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Z. S. Xu, “Dependent uncertain ordered weighted aggregation operators,” Information Fusion, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 310–316, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y. J. Xu and H. M. Wang, “The induced generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application in group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1168–1179, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. J. Xu and H. M. Wang, “Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3988–3997, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. R. Yager, “Centered OWA operators,” Soft Computing, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 631–639, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Zarghami and F. Szidarovszky, “Revising the OWA operator for multi criteria decision making problems under uncertainty,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 259–265, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  43. L.-G. Zhou and H.-Y. Chen, “Generalized ordered weighted logarithm aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 683–707, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L.-G. Zhou and H.-Y. Chen, “Continuous generalized OWA operator and its application to decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 168, pp. 18–34, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  45. F. Herrera and L. Martinez, “An approach for combining linguistic and numerical information based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model in decision-making,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 539–562, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  46. Y.-J. Xu and Q.-L. Da, “Standard and mean deviation methods for linguistic group decision making and their applications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 5905–5912, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus