Research Article
Genetic Algorithm for Biobjective Urban Transit Routing Problem
Table 6
Computational results for method 2.
| Case | CPU time (sec) | Generation | Objective | Results | | | | | ATT | |
| I | 23.33 | 116 | Passenger | 88.53 | 11.11 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 10.93 | 126 | Operator | 72.54 | 25.27 | 1.93 | 0.27 | 13.14 | 68 |
| II | 41.71 | 145 | Passenger | 92.92 | 7.00 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 10.48 | 175 | Operator | 66.05 | 31.20 | 2.47 | 0.28 | 13.36 | 69 |
| III | 50.64 | 158 | Passenger | 93.53 | 6.28 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 10.43 | 196 | Operator | 56.81 | 36.13 | 6.31 | 0.75 | 14.29 | 67 |
| IV | 55.56 | 172 | Passenger | 94.68 | 5.29 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 10.32 | 231 | Operator | 60.99 | 27.85 | 8.72 | 2.44 | 14.61 | 66 |
| Average | 42.81 | 148 | Passenger | 92.42 | 7.42 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 10.54 | 182 | Operator | 64.10 | 30.11 | 4.86 | 0.94 | 13.85 | 68 |
|
|