Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2013, Article ID 792507, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/792507
Research Article

Analysis and Control of Epileptiform Spikes in a Class of Neural Mass Models

Key Lab of Industrial Computer Control Engineering of Hebei Province, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China

Received 4 February 2013; Accepted 15 April 2013

Academic Editor: Constantinos Siettos

Copyright © 2013 Xian Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. David and K. J. Friston, “A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics,” NeuroImage, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1743–1755, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. H. Lopes Da Silva, A. Hoeks, H. Smits, and L. H. Zetterberg, “Model of brain rhythmic activity. The alpha rhythm of the thalamus,” Kybernetic, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. H. Jansen, G. Zouridakis, and M. E. Brandt, “A neurophysiologically-based mathematical model of flash visual evoked potentials,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. H. Jansen and V. G. Rit, “Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 357–366, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  5. A. Spiegler, S. J. Kiebel, F. M. Atay, and T. R. Knösche, “Bifurcation analysis of neural mass models: impact of extrinsic inputs and dendritic time constants,” NeuroImage, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1041–1058, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Huang, D. Zhang, J. Meng, and X. Zhu, “Interactions between two neural populations: a mechanism of chaos and oscillation in neural mass model,” Neurocomputing, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1026–1034, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Babajani and H. Soltanian-Zadeh, “Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1794–1801, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. C. Sotero, N. J. Trujillo-Barreto, Y. Iturria-Medina, F. Carbonell, and J. C. Jimenez, “Realistically coupled neural mass models can generate EEG rhythms,” Neural Computation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 478–512, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. F. Cona, M. Zavaglia, M. Massimini, M. Rosanova, and M. Ursino, “A neural mass model of interconnected regions simulates rhythm propagation observed via TMS-EEG,” NeuroImage, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1045–1058, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. O. David, L. Harrison, and K. J. Friston, “Modelling event-related responses in the brain,” NeuroImage, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 756–770, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. J. Friston, “Models of brain function in neuroimaging,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 56, pp. 57–87, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Yvert, M. Perrone-Bertolotti, M. Baciu, and O. David, “Dynamic causal modeling of spatiotemporal integration of phonological and semantic processes: an electroencephalographic study,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 4297–4303, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. J. Kiebel, M. I. Garrido, R. Moran, C. C. Chen, and K. J. Friston, “Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1866–1876, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. J. Kiebel, O. David, and K. J. Friston, “Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization,” NeuroImage, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1273–1284, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. J. Kiebel, M. I. Garrido, and K. J. Friston, “Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses: the role of intrinsic connections,” NeuroImage, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 332–377, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. J. Moran, K. E. Stephan, T. Seidenbecher, H. C. Pape, R. J. Dolan, and K. J. Friston, “Dynamic causal models of steady-state responses,” NeuroImage, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 796–811, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. Wendling, J. J. Bellanger, F. Bartolomei, and P. Chauvel, “Relevance of nonlinear lumped-parameter models in the analysis of depth-EEG epileptic signals,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 367–378, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Goodfellow, K. Schindler, and G. Baier, “Intermittent spike-wave dynamics in a heterogeneous, spatially extended neural mass model,” NeuroImage, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 920–932, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Rosenow and H. Lüders, “Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy,” Brain, vol. 124, no. 9, pp. 1683–1700, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Goodfellow, K. SchindleR, and G. Baier, “Self-organised transients in a neural mass model of epileptogenic tissue dynamics,” Neuroimage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2644–2704, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. L. Velasco, F. Velasco, M. Velasco, D. Trejo, G. Castro, and J. D. Carrillo-Ruiz, “Electrical stimulation of the hippocampal epileptic foci for seizure control: a double-blind, long-term follow-up study,” Epilepsia, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1895–1903, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. T. Sun, M. J. Morrell, and R. E. Wharen, “Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Sunderam, B. Gluckman, D. Reato, and M. Bikson, “Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control,” Epilepsy and Behavior, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6–22, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. J. Schiff, Neural Control Engineering-the Emerging Intersection Between Control theory and Neuroscience, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2012. View at MathSciNet
  25. M. Fliss and H. Sira-Ramirez, “Control via state estimation of some nonlinear systems,” 2004, IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systtems, http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00001096/. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. Mboup, C. Join, and M. Fliss, “A revised look at numerical differentiation with an application to nonlinear feedback control,” in Proceedings of the 15th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, 2007, http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00142588/fr/.
  27. M. Fliess, C. Join, and H. Sira-Ramírez, “Closed-loop fault-tolerant control for uncertain nonlinear systems,” in Control and Observer Design for Nonlinear Finite and Infinite Dimensional Systems, vol. 322 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pp. 217–233, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. M. A. Dichter, “Basic mechanisms of epilepsy: targets for therapeutic intervention,” Epilepsia, vol. 38, supplement 9, pp. S2–S6, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. R. Fish, P. Gloor, F. L. Quesney, and A. Olivier, “Clinical responses to electrical brain stimulation of the temporal and frontal lobes in patients with epilepsy. Pathophysiological implications,” Brain, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 397–414, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. A. Gédouin, E. Delaleau, J. M. Bourgeot, C. Join, S. Arbab Chirani, and S. Calloch, “Experimental comparison of classical PID and model-free control: position control of a shape memory alloy active spring,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 433–441, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus