• Views 614
• Citations 2
• ePub 31
• PDF 417
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2014, Article ID 193749, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/193749
Research Article

## New Mixed Equilibrium Problems and Iterative Algorithms for Fixed Point Problems in Banach Spaces

1School of Mathematics and Sciences, Shijiazhuang University of Economics, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
2Department of Mathematics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China

Received 30 October 2013; Accepted 16 December 2013; Published 9 January 2014

Copyright © 2014 Minjiang Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We first introduce a new mixed equilibrium problem with a relaxed monotone mapping in Banach spaces and prove the existence of solutions of the equilibrium problem. Then we introduce a new iterative algorithm for finding a common element of the set of solutions of the equilibrium problem and the set of fixed points of a quasi--nonexpansive mapping and prove some strong convergence theorems of the iteration. Our results extend and improve the corresponding ones given by Wang et al., Takahashi and Zembayashi, and some others.

#### 1. Introduction

Let be a Banach space with the dual space and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be a bifunction from to , where denotes the set of numbers. The equilibrium problem is to find such that

The set of solutions of the above equilibrium problem is denoted by .

In order to solve the equilibrium problem, the bifunction is usually to be assumed that following conditions are satisfied:(A1) for all ;(A2) is monotone; that is, for all ;(A3)for all , (A4)for all , is convex and lower semicontinuous.

Recently, Takahashi and Zembayashi [1] extended the equilibrium problems and fixed point problems from Hilbert spaces to Banach spaces. More precisely, they gave the following iterative scheme: where is a relatively nonexpansive mapping from into itself such that , is the duality mapping on , and satisfies and for some . They proved that the sequence generated by (3) converges strongly to , where is the generalized projection of onto .

Very recently, Qin et al. [2] introduced the following hybrid algorithm to solve the equilibrium problems and fixed point problems for quasi--nonexpansive mappings in a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space with a nonempty closed convex subset of : where and are two quasi--nonexpansive mappings from into itself such that , , , and are three sequences in satisfying some certain conditions. They proved that the sequence generated by (4) converges strongly to , where is the generalized projection of onto .

In [3], Fang and Huang introduced a concept called a relaxed --monotone mapping.

A mapping is said to be relaxed  --monotone  if there exist a mapping and a function with for all and , where is a constant, such that

Especially, if for all and , where and are two constants, then is said to be -monotone (see, e.g., [46]). They proved that, under some suitable assumptions, the following variational inequality is solvable: find such that where is a function from to . They also proved that the variational inequality (6) is equivalent to the following: find such that

In this paper, let us denote the set of solutions of the variational inequality (6) or (7) by .

It is worthy to notice that it is possible that is a singleton set, includes the finite elements or infinite elements. To show this, we see the following example.

Example 1. Let and . Define the mappings by for all , by for all , and by for all . Then the mapping is a relaxed --monotone mapping. In fact, for all , , we have
Hence, is a relaxed --monotone mapping. Now by defining the different function we find the solution set of (6). First we compute, for , , (i)Let the function for all . It is easy to see that the solution set . That is, only when , (6) holds for all .(ii)Let the function and for all . By (9), it is not hard to see that the solution set .(iii)Let the function for all where and for all . Then by (9) we see that . In this case, includes the unfinite elements.

Recently, Wang et al. [7] proposed the following equilibrium problem in a Hilbert space with a nonempty closed convex bounded subset : find such that where is a relaxed --monotone mapping. They introduced a new algorithm for solving the equilibrium problem in Hilbert spaces.

In [3], Fang and Huang did not give the algorithm to solve the variational inequality (6) or (7). In this paper, motivated and inspired by the above results, we introduced a new mixed equilibrium problem with the relaxed monotone mapping and prove the existence of solutions of the mixed equilibrium problem. Then we propose an iterative scheme to find the common element of the set of solutions of the mixed equilibrium problem and the set of fixed points of a quasi--nonexpansive mapping in Banach spaces. In particular, the variational inequality (6) or (7) may be solved by the algorithm proposed in this paper. Our results extend and improve the corresponding ones given by Takahashi and Zembayashi [1], Fang and Huang [3], and Wang et al. [7].

#### 2. Preliminaries

A Banach space is said to be strictly convex if for all with and . It is said to be uniformly convex if for any two sequences and in such that and .

Let be the unit sphere of . A Banach space is said to be smooth provided exists for each . It is said to be uniformly smooth if the limit is attained uniformly for .

Let be the topological dual space of and be the normalized duality mapping from into given by

It is well known that if is uniformly convex, then is uniformly continuous on bounded subsets of and if is uniformly smooth, then is uniformly convex.

Recently, Alber [8] introduced a generalized projection operator in a Banach space with a nonempty closed convex subset , which is an analogue of the metric projection in Hilbert spaces:

let be a function defined by

The generalized projection   is a mapping that assigns to an arbitrary point the minimum point of the functional ; that is, , where is a solution to the minimization problem

The existence and uniqueness of follows from the properties of the function and the strict monotonicity of the mapping (see, e.g., [812]).

Let be a smooth, strictly convex, and reflexive Banach space . Then, for all , we have the following [8, 9, 11]:

Let be a mapping from into itself. A point is said to be an asymptotic fixed point of [13] if contains a sequence which converges weakly to such that

The set of asymptotic fixed points of is denoted by . The mapping is said to be relatively nonexpansive [1416] if

We recall that a mapping is said to be nonexpansive if for all , is said to be -nonexpansive if for all , and is said to be quasi--nonexpansive if

Notice that the class of quasi--nonexpansive mappings is more general than the class of relatively nonexpansive mappings [1416] which requires the strong restriction that . Some examples of quasi--nonexpansive mappings may be found in [2].

A mapping is said to be closed if for any sequence such that and , then .

The following lemmas are needed for the proof of our main results in next section.

Lemma 2 (see [10]). Let be a uniformly convex and smooth Banach space and let , be two sequences of . If and either or is bounded, then .

Lemma 3 (see [8]). Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a smooth Banach space and . Then if and only if

Lemma 4 (see [8]). Let be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space, let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Then

The following lemma is contained implicitly in Step 1 of Theorem 3.1 of [17].

Lemma 5 (see [17]). Let be a uniformly convex and smooth Banach space, let be a nonempty closed convex subset of , and let be a closed quasi--nonexpansive mapping from into itself. Then is a closed convex subset of .

Lemma 6 (see [18]). Let be a uniformly convex Banach space and let be a closed ball of . Then there exists a continuous strictly increasing convex function with such that for all and with .

#### 3. Main Results

For our main results, we introduce some definitions and lemmas as follows.

Definition 7 (see [3]). Let be a Banach space with the dual space and let be a nonempty subset of . Let and be two mappings. The mapping is said to be -hemicontinuous if, for any fixed , the function defined by is continuous at .

Definition 8. Let be a Banach space with the dual space and let be a nonempty subset of . A mapping is called a KKM mapping if, for any , where denotes the family of all the nonempty subsets of .

Lemma 9 (see [19]). Let be a nonempty subset of a Hausdorff topological vector space and let be a KKM mapping. If is closed in for all in and compact for some , then .

Lemma 10. Let be a reflexive Banach space with the dual space and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be an -hemicontinuous and relaxed --monotone mapping. Let be a bifunction from to satisfying and and let be a proper convex function from to . Let and . Assume that (i) for all ;(ii)for any fixed , the mapping is convex.
Then the following problems (23) and (24) are equivalent:(I)find such that (II)find such that

Proof. Let be a solution of the problem (23). Since is relaxed - monotone, we have Thus, is a solution of the problem (24).
Conversely, let be a solution of the problem (24) and let be any point with . From (24), it follows that . Letting we have . Since is a solution of the problem (24), it follows that
The convexity of and conditions (i), (ii), (A1), and (A4) imply that
Thus, it follows from (27)-(28) that
Since is -hemicontinuous and , letting in (29), we get for all with . When , the relation is trivial. Therefore, is also a solution of the problem (23). This completes the proof.

Lemma 11. Let be a reflexive Banach space with the dual space and let be a nonempty closed convex bounded subset of . Let be an -hemicontinuous and relaxed --monotone mapping, let be a bifunction from to satisfying and , and let be a proper convex function from to . Let and . Assume that (i) for all ;(ii)for any fixed , the mapping is convex and lower semicontinuous;(iii) is weakly lower semicontinuous; that is, for any net , converges to in implying that . Then the problem (23) is solvable.

Proof. Define two set-valued mappings as follows: respectively.
Now, we claim that is a KKM mapping. If is not a KKM mapping, then there exist and , , such that
By the definition of , we have
It follows that which is a contradiction. This implies that is a KKM mapping.
Now, we prove that
For any given , letting , then
Since is relaxed --monotone, we have which implies that and so
As in the proof of Theorem  2.2 in [3], also, we can obtain
Hence, there exists such that This completes the proof.

Next, let us denote the set of solutions of the following mixed equilibrium problem by : find such that

It is easy to see that if for all , then the above mixed equilibrium problem reduces to the variational inequality problem (6) or (7).

Lemma 12. Let be a uniformly smooth, strictly convex Banach space with the dual space and let be a nonempty closed convex bounded subset of . Let be an -hemicontinuous and relaxed --monotone mapping, let be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1), (A2), and (A4), and let be a proper convex function from to . Let and define a mapping as follows: for all . Assume that
(i)  , for all ;
(ii) for any fixed , the mapping is convex and lower semicontinuous;
(iii)   is weakly lower semicontinuous; that is, for any net , converges to in implying that ;
(iv) for any , ;
(v)  , for any and .
Then the following hold:(1) is single-valued;(2) is a firmly nonexpansive-type mapping; that is, for all , (3);(4) is quasi--nonexpansive satisfying for all and ;(5) is closed and convex.

Proof. We claim that is single-valued. Indeed, for any and , let . Then we have
Adding the two inequalities, it follows from (i) that
Thus, from (A2), we have that is,
Since is relaxed --monotone and , one has
In (48), exchanging to , we get that is,
Thus, it follows from (49), (51), and (iv) that Since is strictly convex, we have .
Next, we claim that is a firmly nonexpansive-type mapping. Indeed, for any , we have
Adding the above two inequalities, by (i) and (A2), we get that is,
Repeating the process from (48) to (52), we can obtain
Therefore, we have which shows that is firmly nonexpansive.
Next, we claim that . Indeed, we have the following:
Finally, we prove (4) and (5). Indeed, we can obtain (4) directly from Lemma 2.8 and Lemma 2.9 of [1]. Moreover, since is quasi--nonexpansive, one sees that is closed and convex from Lemma 5. Therefore, is also closed and convex. This completes the proof.

Remark 13. In (42), if for all , then the equilibrium problem (42) is reduced to the equilibrium problem in [20] and if for all , then then the equilibrium problem (42) is reduced to the equilibrium problem in [21].

In the following, we give the main result of this paper.

Theorem 14. Let be a nonempty closed convex bounded subset of a uniformly convex, uniformly smooth Banach space with the dual space . Let be an -hemicontinuous and relaxed - monotone mapping, let be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)–(A4), and let be a proper convex and lower semicontinuous function from to . Let be a closed quasi--nonexpansive mapping such that . Assume that the conditions (i)–(v), Lemma 12, and the following condition hold:
(vi) for all ,
Let be a sequence in generated by the following manner: where is the duality mapping on , with , and with . Then the sequence generated by (52) converges strongly to .

Proof. First, since the inequality is equivalent to the following: is closed and convex for all . It follows from the definition of that is also closed and convex for all .
On the other hand, since every is quasi--nonexpansive, according to Lemma 12 (4), we have, for any , which shows that for all . This implies that for all . The definition of shows that for all . Hence, the sequence generated by the algorithm (60) is well defined.
Note that for all . Hence, by and , we have
Therefore, is nondecreasing. Since , is bounded. It follows that the limit of exists.
Let with . Since , from Lemma 4 it follows that
Letting in (64), it follows that . It follows from Lemma 2 that as . Hence is a Cauchy sequence. There exists a point such that as .
Next, we show that . By taking in (64), one arrives at
From Lemma 2, it follows that
Noticing that for all , we obtain
Thus, it follows from (65) that
It follows from Lemma 2 that
Combining (66) with (69), one has
Since as , we have
On the other hand, since is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded sets, one has
Since is a uniformly smooth Banach space, one knows that is a uniformly convex Banach space. Let . It follows from Lemma 6 that, for any ,
It follows that
On the other hand, one has
Thus, it follows from (70) and (72) that
Noting that and using (74) and (76), we get
It follows from the continuousness of that
Since is also uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded sets, one gets From the closeness of , we can conclude that .
Next, we show that . From (62), we arrived at
From and Lemma 12 (4), one has
Thus, it follows from (76) that
From Lemma 2, we get
Noting that , one obtains
From (A4) and (i), it follows that
Since is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded sets, one has
Noticing that for all , it follows from (A4), (ii), (85), and (86) that
For all and , define . Noticing that , one obtains , which yields that
It follows from (A1), (A4), (i), (ii), the convexity of , and (88) that that is,
Letting , it follows from (A3), (vi), and the lower semicontinuity of that This implies that .
Finally, we prove . From , we see that
Since for each , we have
By taking the limit in (93), one has At this point, in view of Lemma 3, one sees that . This completes the proof.

If in Theorem 14, then we have the following result.

Corollary 15. Let be a nonempty closed convex bounded subset of a uniformly convex, uniformly smooth Banach space with the dual space . Let be an -hemicontinuous and relaxed --monotone mapping and let be a proper convex and lower semicontinuous function from to . Let be a closed quasi--nonexpansive mapping such that . Assume that the conditions (i)–(v), Lemma 12, and the following condition hold:
(vi) for all ,
Let be a sequence in generated by the following manner: where is the duality mapping on , with , and with . Then the sequence generated by (96) converges strongly to .

If and in Theorem 14, then we have following.

Corollary 16. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex, uniformly smooth Banach space with the dual space . Let be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)–(A4) and let be a closed quasi--nonexpansive mapping such that . Let be a sequence generated by the following manner: where is the duality mapping on , with and with . Then the sequence generated by (97) converges strongly to .

Remark 17. Theorem 14 improves the corresponding ones of Wang et al. [7] from Hilbert spaces to Banach spaces and those of Takahashi and Zembayashi [1] from relative nonexpansive mapping to quasi--nonexpansive mapping.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

#### Authors’ Contribution

The authors read and approved the final paper.

#### Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Hebei Provincial Education Department (Grant no.: Z2013110), the Society Program Fund of Hebei Provincial Education Department (Grant no.: GH132068), and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (Grant no.: 13MS109).

#### References

1. W. Takahashi and K. Zembayashi, “Strong and weak convergence theorems for equilibrium problems and relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2009.
2. X. L. Qin, Y. J. Cho, and S. M. Kang, “Convergence theorems of common elements for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2009.
3. Y. P. Fang and N. J. Huang, “Variational-like inequalities with generalized monotone mappings in Banach spaces,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 327–338, 2003.
4. D. Goeleven and D. Motreanu, “Eigenvalue and dynamic problems for variational and hemivariational inequalities,” Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 3, pp. 1–21, 1996.
5. A. H. Saddqi, Q. H. Ansari, and K. R. Kazmi, “On nonlinear variational inequalities,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 25, pp. 969–973, 1994.
6. R. U. Verma, “Nonlinear variational inequalities on convex subsets of banach spaces,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 25–27, 1997.
7. S. H. Wang, G. Marino, and F. H. Wang, “Strong convergence theorems for a generalized equilibrium problem with a relaxed monotone mapping and a countable family of nonexpansive mappings in a Hilbert space,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 230304, 22 pages, 2010.
8. Y. L. Alber, “Metric and generalized projection operators in Banach spaces: properties and applications,” in Theorem and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type, A. G. Kartsatos, Ed., pp. 15–50, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
9. I. Cioranescu, Geometry of Banach Spaces, Duaity Mappings and Nonlinear Problems, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
10. S. Kamimura and W. Takahashi, “Strong convergence of a proximal-type algorithm in a Banach space,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 938–945, 2003.
11. W. Takahashi, Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, 2000.
12. Y. L. Alber and S. Guerre-Delabriere, “On the projection methods for fixed point problems,” Analysis, vol. 21, pp. 17–39, 2001.
13. S. Reich, “A weak convergence theorem for the alternating method with Bregman distance,” in Theory and Applications of NonlInear Operators of Accretive and Montone Type, A. G. Kartsatos, Ed., pp. 313–318, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
14. D. Butnariu, S. Reich, and A. J. Zaslavski, “Asymptotic behavior of relatively nonexpansiv operators in Banach spaces,” Journal of Applied Analysis, vol. 7, pp. 151–174, 2001.
15. D. Butnariu, S. Reich, and A. J. Zaslavski, “Weak convergence of orbits of nonlinear operators in reflexive Banach spaces,” Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, vol. 24, no. 5-6, pp. 489–508, 2003.
16. Y. Censor and S. Reich, “Iterations of paracontractions and firmly nonexpansive operators with applications to feasibility and optimization,” Optimization, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 323–339, 1996.
17. H. Y. Zhou and X. H. Gao, “A strong convergence theorem for a family of quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings in a banach space,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2009, Article ID 351265, 12 pages, 2009.
18. Y. J. Cho, H. Zhou, and G. Guo, “Weak and strong convergence theorems for three-step iterations with errors for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 47, no. 4-5, pp. 707–717, 2004.
19. K. Fan, “Some properties of convex sets related to fixed point theorems,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 266, no. 4, pp. 519–537, 1984.
20. R. Wangkeeree and R. Wangkeeree, “A general iterative method for variational inequality problems, mixed equilibrium problems, and fixed point problems of strictly pseudocontractive mappings in Hilbert spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2009, Article ID 519065, 32 pages, 2009.
21. S. Zhang, “Generalized mixed equilibrium problem in Banach spaces,” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1105–1112, 2009.