Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2014, Article ID 217174, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/217174
Research Article

Asymptotic Modeling of the Thin Film Flow with a Pressure-Dependent Viscosity

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Bijenička 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Received 15 April 2014; Revised 19 June 2014; Accepted 26 June 2014; Published 16 July 2014

Academic Editor: Weiqing Liu

Copyright © 2014 Eduard Marušić-Paloka and Igor Pažanin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Z. Szeri, Fluid Film Lubrication: Theory and Design, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  2. O. Reynolds, “On the theory of lubrication and its applications to Mr. Beauchamp Towers experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol. 177, pp. 157–234, 1886. View at Google Scholar
  3. W. R. Jones, “Pressure viscosity measurement for several lubricants,” ASLE Transactions, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 249–262, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. C. Jain, R. Sinhasan, and D. V. Singh, “Consideration of viscosity variation in determining the performance characteristics of circular bearings in the laminar and turbulent regimes,” Wear, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 233–245, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. R. Gwynllyw, A. R. Davies, and T. N. Phillips, “On the effects of a piezoviscous lubricant on the dynamics of a journal bearing,” Journal of Rheology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1239–1266, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Goubert, J. Vermant, P. Moldenaers, A. Göttfert, and B. Ernst, “Comparison of measurement techniques for evaluating the pressure dependence of the viscosity,” Applied Rheology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Barus, “Isothermals, isopiestics and isometrics relative to viscosity,” The American Journal of Science, vol. 45, pp. 87–96, 1893. View at Google Scholar
  8. P. A. Kottke, Rheological implications of tension in liquids [Ph.D. thesis], Georgia Institute of Technology, 2004.
  9. M. Renardy, “Some remarks on the Navier-Stokes equations with a pressure-dependent viscosity,” Communications in Partial Differential Equations, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 779–793, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. F. Gazzola, “A note on the evolution Navier-Stokes equations with a pressure-dependent viscosity,” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 760–773, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. J. Málek, J. Nečas, and K. R. Rajagopal, “Global analysis of the flows of fluids with pressure-dependent viscosities,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 243–269, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. E. Marušić-Paloka and S. Marušić, “Analysis of the Reynolds equation for lubrication in case of pressure-dependent viscosity,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 710214, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. E. Marusic-Paloka, “An analysis of the Stokes system with pressure dependent viscosity,” In press.
  14. E. Marušić-Paloka and I. Pažanin, “A note on the pipe flow with a pressure-dependent viscosity,” Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, vol. 197, pp. 5–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. van Dyke, Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics, The Parabolic Press, Stanford, Calif, USA, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  16. G. H. Wannier, “A contribution to the hydrodynamics of lubrication,” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 8, pp. 1–32, 1950. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. R. K. Zeytouninan, Modelisation Asymptotique en Mecanique des Fluides Newtoniens, Collection SMAI, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1994.
  18. D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Springer, 1997.
  19. K. R. Rajagopal and A. Z. Szeri, “On an inconsistency in the derivation of the equations of elastohydrodynamic lubrication,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 459, no. 2039, pp. 2771–2786, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. S. A. Nazarov, “Asymptotic solution of the Navier-Stokes problem on the flow of a thin layer of fluid,” Siberian Mathematical Journal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 296–307, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. A. Duvnjak and E. Marusic-Paloka, “Derivation of the Reynolds equation for lubrication of a rotating shaft,” Archivum Mathematicum, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 239–253, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. J. Wilkening, “Practical error estimates for Reynolds' lubrication approximation and its higher order corrections,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 588–630, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. E. Marušić-Paloka, I. Pažanin, and S. Marušić, “Second order model in fluid film lubrication,” Comptes Rendus: Mecanique, vol. 340, no. 8, pp. 596–601, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Conca, F. Murat, and O. Pironneau, “The Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations with boundary conditions involving the pressure,” Japanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 20, pp. 263–318, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. L. Cattabriga, “Su un problema al contorno relativo al sistema di equazioni di Stokes,” Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, vol. 31, pp. 308–340, 1961. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet