Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 275425, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/275425
Research Article

Simple and High-Accurate Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

LMIB and School of Mathematics and Systems Science, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

Received 1 May 2013; Revised 4 January 2014; Accepted 6 January 2014; Published 2 March 2014

Academic Editor: Vit Dolejsi

Copyright © 2014 Renzhong Feng and Zheng Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. K. Godunov, “A difference method for numerical calculation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of hydrodynamics,” Matematicheskii Sbornik, vol. 47–89, no. 3, pp. 271–306, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. S. Balsara and C. W. Shu, “Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 405–452, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  3. G. S. Jiang and C. W. Shu, “Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 202–228, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  4. A. Harten, B. Engquist, S. Osher, and S. R. Chakravarthy, “Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 231–303, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  5. C. Canuto and A. Quarteroni, Eds., Spectral and Higher Order Methods for Partial Differential Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990.
  6. A. I. Tolstykh, High Accuracy Non-Centered Compact Difference Schemes for Fluid Dynamics Applications, World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, USA, 1994.
  7. B. Cockburn and C. W. Shu, “The runge-kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws V: multidimensional systems,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 199–224, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. F. Toro and V. A. Titarev, “TVD fluxes for the high-order ADER schemes,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 285–309, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  9. B. van Leer, “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 263–275, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. B. van Leer, “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 276–299, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. B. van Leer, “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 101–136, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. L. Roe, “Numerical algorithms for the linear wave equation,” Tech. Rep. 81047, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Bedford, UK, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Harten, “High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 357–393, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. E. F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  15. P. L. Roe, “Some contributions to the modelling of discontinuous flows,” in Proceedings of the SIAM/AMS Seminar, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1983.
  16. B. van Leer, “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 361–370, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  17. G. D. van Albada, B. van Leer, and W. W. Roberts, “A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics, astron,” Astrophysics, vol. 108, pp. 76–84, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  18. G. A. Sod, “A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  19. B. Thornber, D. Drikakis, R. J. R. Williams, and D. Youngs, “On entropy generation and dissipation of kinetic energy in high-resolution shock-capturing schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 227, no. 10, pp. 4853–4872, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  20. E. F. Toro, M. Spruce, and W. Speares, “Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver,” Shock Waves, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  21. B. van Leer, “On the relation between the upwind-differencing schems of Godunov, Enguist-Osher and Roe,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  22. X. D. Liu, “Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 200–212, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  23. G.-S. Jiang and C. W. Shu, “Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 202–228, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  24. B. Cockburn and C. W. Shu, “TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: general frame-work,” Mathematics of Compution, vol. 52, pp. 411–435, 1989. View at Google Scholar