Research Article
A New Method for Setting Futures Portfolios’ Maintenance Margins: Evidence from Chinese Commodity Futures Markets
Table 5
The results of the Kupiec test for the PSRM method.
| | | The number of the failure days | The failure rate | LR statistics |
| Portfolio A | P
* = 5% | 59 | 0.0502 | 0.0007 (0.9787) | P
* = 2.5% | 26 | 0.0221 | 0.4194 (0.5173) | P
* = 1% | 9 | 0.0077 | 0.7119 (0.3988) |
| Portfolio B | P
* = 5% | 47 | 0.0400 | 2.6477 (0.1037) | P
* = 2.5% | 17 | 0.0145 | 6.2875 (0.0122) | P
* = 1% | 5 | 0.0043 | 4.9949 (0.0254) |
| Portfolio C | P
* = 5% | 54 | 0.0459 | 0.4150 (0.5195) | P
* = 2.5% | 26 | 0.0221 | 0.4134 (0.5202) | P
* = 1% | 7 | 0.0060 | 2.2682 (0.1321) |
| Portfolio D | P
* = 5% | 64 | 0.0545 | 0.4804 (0.4882) | P
* = 2.5% | 38 | 0.0323 | 2.3807 (0.1228) | P
* = 1% | 12 | 0.0102 | 0.0053 (0.9418) |
|
|
Notes: the figures in parenthesis denote the value of the LR statistics.
|