Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2014, Article ID 408685, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/408685
Research Article

A Multiperiod Equilibrium Pricing Model

1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4K1
2Department of Finance, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300071, China

Received 7 November 2013; Revised 15 January 2014; Accepted 16 January 2014; Published 5 March 2014

Academic Editor: Pu-yan Nie

Copyright © 2014 Minsuk Kwak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Rubinstein, “The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options,” The Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 407–425, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. M. J. Brennan, “The pricing of contingent claims in discrete time models,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 53–68, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. S. Bhattacharya, “Notes on multiperiod valuation and the pricing of options,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 163–180, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. A. Bizid and E. Jouini, “Incomplete markets and short-sales constraints: an equilibrium approach,” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 211–243, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. A. Câmara, “A generalization of the brennan-rubinstein approach for the pricing of derivatives,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 805–819, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Cao and J. Wei, “Weather derivatives valuation and market price of weather risk,” Journal of Futures Markets, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1065–1089, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Lee and S. S. Oren, “An equilibrium pricing model for weather derivatives in a multi-commodity setting,” Energy Economics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 702–713, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Lee and S. S. Oren, “A multi-period equilibrium pricing model of weather derivatives,” Energy Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–30, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Cheridito, U. Horst, M. Kupper, and T. A. Pirvu, “Equilibrium pricing in incomplete markets under translation invariant preferences,” 2012, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1755610.
  10. R. E. Lucas, Jr., “Asset prices in an exchange economy,” Econometrica, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1429–1445, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. S. Hodges and A. Neuberger, “Optimal replication of contingent claims under transaction costs,” Review of Futures Markets, vol. 8, pp. 222–239, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Musiela, E. Sokolova, and T. Zariphopoulou, “Indifference valuation in incomplete binomial models,” Mathematics in Action, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–36, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. V. Henderson, “Valuation of claims on nontraded assets using utility maximization,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 351–373, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. M. Musiela and T. Zariphopoulou, “A valuation algorithm for indifference prices in incomplete markets,” Finance and Stochastics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 399–414, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. V. Henderson and D. Hobson, “Utility indierence pricing-an overview,” in Volume on Indierence Pricing, R. Carmona, Ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. T. A. Pirvu and H. Zhang, “Utility indierence pricing: a time consistent approach,” Applied Mathematical Finance, vol. 20, pp. 304–326, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Gordon and P. St-Amour, “A preference regime model of bull and bear markets,” American Economic Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1019–1033, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. Barberis and M. Huang, “Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1247–1292, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J.-P. Danthine, J. B. Donaldson, C. Giannikos, and H. Guirguis, “On the consequences of state dependent preferences for the pricing of financial assets,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 143–153, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Gordon and P. St-Amour, “Asset returns and state-dependent risk preferences,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. B. Yuan and K. Chen, “Impact of investor's varying risk aversion on the dynamics of asset price fluctuations,” Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 189–214, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Berrada, J. Detemple, and M. Rindisbacher, “Asset pricing with regime-dependent preferences and learning,” 2013, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2313807.
  23. T. Björk and A. Murgoci, “A general theory of Markovian time inconsistent stochastic control problems,” 2010, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1694759.
  24. H. Wu, “Time-consistent strategies for a multiperiod mean-variance portfolio selection problem,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 841627, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. N. Gârleanu, L. H. Pedersen, and A. M. Poteshman, “Demand-based option pricing,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 4259–4299, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus