Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2015, Article ID 315340, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/315340
Research Article

Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis Based on Choquet Integral

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received 16 December 2014; Revised 23 March 2015; Accepted 30 March 2015

Academic Editor: Mustafa Inc

Copyright © 2015 Meimei Xia. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Chen, G. Kou, and J. Shang, “An analytic decision making framework to evaluate multiple marketing channels,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1420–1434, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Kou, D. Ergu, and Y. Shi, “An integrated expert system for fast disaster assessment,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 42, pp. 95–107, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Lahdelma, J. Hokkanen, and P. Salminen, “SMAA—stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 137–143, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, “SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making,” Operations Research, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 444–454, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, “The shape of the utility or value function in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis,” OR Spectrum, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 785–802, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. G. Choquet, “Theory of capacities,” Annales de l'Institut Fourier, vol. 54, pp. 131–295, 1953. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. S. Angilella, S. Corrente, and S. Greco, “SMAA-Choquet: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 300, no. 4, pp. 248–257, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Angilella, S. Corrente, and S. Greco, “Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 240, no. 1, pp. 172–182, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. B. S. Ahn, “A priori identification of preferred alternatives of OWA operators by relational analysis of arguments,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 23, pp. 4572–4581, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F.-M. Ma, Y.-J. Guo, and X. Shan, “Analysis of the impact of attitudinal character on the multicriteria decision making with OWA operators,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 502–518, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183–190, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. J.-L. Marichal, “An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 800–807, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Sugeno, Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications [Ph.D. thesis], Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 1974.
  14. M. Grabisch, “k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 167–189, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. G.-C. Rota, “On the foundations of combinatorial theory. I. Theory of Möbius functions,” Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, vol. 2, pp. 340–368, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. K. Fujimoto and T. Murofushi, “Some characterizations of the systems represented by Choquet and multi-linear functionals through the use of Möbius inversion,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 547–561, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. O. Despic and S. P. Simonovic, “Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 11–33, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  18. A. Kolesàrovà and J. Mordelovà, “1-lipschitz and kernel aggregation operators,” in Proceedings of the International Summer School on Aggregation Operators and Their Applications (AGOP '01), Oviedo, Spain, 2001.
  19. E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, and E. Pap, Triangular Norms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, The Netherlands, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. J.-L. Marichal, “Tolerant or intolerant character of interacting criteria in aggregation by the Choquet integral,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 771–791, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. J. C. Harsanyi, “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 309–321, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Weber, “Decision making with incomplete information,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Anandalingam and C. E. Olsson, “A multi-stage multi-attribute decision model for project selection,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 271–283, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. S. Eum, K. S. Park, and S. H. Kim, “Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and value,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 397–409, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. S. Park, “Mathematical programming models for characterizing dominance and potential optimality when multicriteria alternative values and weights are simultaneously incomplete,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 601–614, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus