Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Automated Methods and Management in Chemistry
Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 498921, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/498921
Research Article

Increasing Efficiency and Quality by Consolidation of Clinical Chemistry and Immunochemistry Systems with MODULAR ANALYTICS SWA

1University Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of Desio, Via Benefattori 2, 20033 Desio Milano, Italy
2Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215-5400, USA
3Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. med. Bernd Schottdorf u.a., 86154 Augsburg, Germany
4Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ziekenhuis Rijnstate Arnhem, 6800 TA Arnhem, The Netherlands
5Department of Clinical Chemistry, Georg-August-University Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
6Hospital de la Plana, Vila Real 1254, Castelló, Spain
7Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Sandhofer Street 116, 68305 Mannheim, Germany
8Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., 9115 Hague Road, P.O. Box 50416, Indianapolis, IN 46250, USA

Received 25 October 2007; Accepted 19 December 2007

Academic Editor: Peter Stockwell

Copyright © 2008 Paolo Mocarelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. W. Forsman, “Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations?” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 813–816, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  2. G. L. Horowitz, Z. Zaman, N. J. C. Blanckaert et al., “MODULAR ANALYTICS: a new approach to automation in the clinical laboratory,” Journal of Automated Methods and Management in Chemistry, vol. 2005, no. 1, pp. 8–25, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Bieglmayer, D. W. Chan, L. Sokoll et al., “Multicentre evaluation of the E170 module for MODULAR ANALYTICS,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1186–1202, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. W. Bablok, R. Barembruch, W. Stockmann et al., “CAEv—a program for computer aided evaluation,” The Journal of Automatic Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 167–179, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. W. Bablok and W. Stockmann, “An alternative approach to a system evaluation in the field,” Quimica Clinica, vol. 14, p. 239, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  6. F. L. Redondo, P. Bermudez, C. Cocco et al., “Evaluation of cobas integra® 800 under simulated routine conditions in six laboratories,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 365–381, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. P. M. G. Broughton, A. H. Gowenlock, J. J. McCormack, and D. W. Neill, “A revised scheme for the evaluation of automatic instruments for use in clinical chemistry,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 207–218, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  8. W. Stockmann, W. Bablok, W. Poppe et al., “Criteria of practicability,” in Evaluation Methods in Laboratory Medicine, R. Haeckel, Ed., pp. 185–201, VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Bonini, F. Ceriotti, F. Keller et al., “Multicentre evaluation of the Boehringer Mannheim/Hitachi 747 analysis system,” European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 881–899, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  10. C. G. Fraser, P. H. Peterson, C. Ricós, and R. Haeckel, “Criteria for imprecision,” in Evaluation Methods in Laboratory Medicine, R. Haeckel, Ed., pp. 87–99, VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. G. Fraser, P. H. Peterson, C. Ricós, and R. Haeckel, “Proposed quality specifications for the imprecision and inaccuracy of analytical systems for clinical chemistry,” European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 311–317, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  12. C. Ricós, V. Alvarez, F. Cava et al., “Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 491–500, 1999. View at Google Scholar