Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Automated Methods and Management in Chemistry
Volume 2010, Article ID 323509, 7 pages
Research Article

Preparation, Characterization, and Application of Magnetic Fe-SBA-15 Mesoporous Silica Molecular Sieves

1Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2Department of Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received 24 March 2010; Accepted 19 July 2010

Academic Editor: Xiu-Ping Yan

Copyright © 2010 Huayu Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Magnetic Fe-SBA-15 mesoporous silica molecular sieves were prepared, characterized, and used for magnetic separation. Wet impregnation, drying, and calcination steps led to iron inclusion within the mesopores. Iron oxide was reduced to the metal form with hydrogen, and the magnetic Fe-SBA-15 was obtained. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the preparation process from the oxide to metal forms. The structure of magnetic materials was confirmed by Mössbauer spectra. Powder X-ray diffraction data indicated that the structure of Fe-SBA-15 retained the host SBA-15 structure. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analysis revealed a decrease in surface area and pore size, indicating Fe-SBA-15 coating on the inner surfaces. Scanning electron micrographs confirmed the decrease in size for modified SBA-15 particles. From scanning electron micrographs, it was found that the size of the modified SBA-15 particles decreased. Transmission electron micrographs also confirmed that modified SBA-15 retained the structure of the parent SBA-15 silica. Fe-SBA-15 exhibited strong magnetic properties, with a magnetization value of 8.8 emu g-1. The iron content in Fe-SBA-15 was determined by atom adsorption spectroscopy. Fe-SBA-15 was successfully used for the magnetic separation of three aromatic compounds in water. Our results suggest wide applicability of Fe-SBA-15 magnetic materials for the rapid and efficient separation of various compounds.

1. Introduction

Mesoporous SBA-15 silica molecular sieves of large pore diameter (up to 30 nm) and area (up to 1000 m2 g-1) [1] show excellent homogeneity and stability and can be well controlled for adsorption/desorption processes [2]. Mesoporous silica materials, especially mesoporous SBA-15 molecular sieves, have been modified with 3-mercaptopropyl, 3-aminopropyl, octyl, or octadecyl groups for the separation and analysis of inorganic ions, organic compounds, and biological molecules [25]. However, SBA-15 is notoriously difficult to separate from solution. Magnetic separation is a useful tool because of its fast recovery, high efficiency, and low high cost [6]. Inclusion of magnetic components in modified materials allows convenient and economical magnetic separation instead of centrifugation and filtration steps on application of an appropriate magnetic field [79]. Because of their potential applications in this approach, the preparation of Co, Co/Fe, α-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3, and Fe3O4 magnetic SBA-15 materials have been reported [1015].

We propose a convenient and effective procedure for iron doping of mesoporous SBA-15 silica because of its excellent magnetic properties. The product was prepared by wet impregnation, calcinations, and reduction. First, the pores of SBA-15 were doped with iron ions. Then Fe3+ was transformed to the oxide form by calcination in the air. Finally, ferric oxide in SBA-15 was reduced with H2 [7, 15, 16]. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram for preparation of magnetic SBA-15. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Mössbauer spectra (MS), surface area analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques were used to characterize the material. The magnetic behavior was determined using a vibrating sample magnetometer. The iron content in Fe-SBA-15 was determined by atom adsorption spectroscopy (AAS).

Figure 1: Flow diagram for the preparation of magnetic Fe-SBA-15.

With the development of petroleum refining and chemical engineering, the release of harmful organic chemicals into the environment has attracted global attention because of their toxicity and widespread use, especially aromatic compounds considered as carcinogenic [7]. The aim of the present study was to develop a method for preparing magnetic SBA-15 for use as a sorbent to remove benzene and related derivatives from water. The adsorption of benzene, toluene, and ethyl benzene on magnetic SBA-15 particles was determined by gas chromatography (GC).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Mesoporous SBA-15 silica molecular sieves were purchased from Changchun Jilin University High-Tech. Co. Ltd. (Jilin, China). Fe(NO3)3 was purchased from Tianjin Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Benzene, toluene, and ethyl benzene were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Deionized water was prepared using a Millipore unit (Bedford, MA, USA).

2.2. Sample Preparation

SBA-15 was soaked in 0.1 mol L-1 HCl for 24 h, filtered, washed with deionized water, and dried in an oven at 100°C for 8 h.

A sample of 2 g of SBA-15 was dispersed in 1 mol L-1 Fe(NO3)3 solution by ultrasonication for 2 h. The material was filtered under low pressure and dried in an oven at 100°C. Samples were calcined in a muffle furnace at 750°C for 6 h to obtain a red powder, which was then reduced under a H2 flow (35 mL min-1) at 800°C for 6 h. The final product was designated Fe-SBA-15.

2.3. Characterization

FT-IR spectra of SBA-15 particles were recorded before and after modification on a Nicolet (USA) 360 FT-IR instrument.

Powder XRD patterns were measured on a D/max-2400 (Rigaku, Japan) instrument using Cu Kα radiation.

Fe Mössbauer spectra were collected using a conventional constant acceleration spectrometer (Wissel, German) with a 25 m Ci source of 57Co in palladium at room temperature. The percentage of Fe, Fe(II), and Fe(III) were calculated and contributor of magnetic behavior was confirmed.

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption experiments were carried out at 76.53 K on an ASAP 2010 accelerated surface area and porosimetry system (Micromeritics, USA). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area (𝑆BET) was calculated from the linearity of the BET equation. The surface area, volume and pore diameter were calculated from pore size distribution curves using the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) formula.

The surface morphology of powders was observed under a JSM-6380LV scanning electron microscope (Jeol, Japan).

For TEM observation, samples were dispersed in ethanol, deposited on a grid of holey copper and transferred to a JEM-1230 emission electron microscope (Jeol, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.

A Lakeshore (USA) 7304 vibrating sample magnetometer was used to record magnetization curves of the samples.

2.4. Determination of Iron in Fe-SBA-15

A sample of 10 mg of Fe-SBA-15 was heated in a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid to completely dissolve the iron and transferred to a 25-mL volumetric flask and made up to volume with water. The solution was centrifuged at 10000 rpm and the iron concentration was determined on an AA-6800 instrument (Shimadzu, Japan). Standard Fe3+ solutions (0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 10.0 μg mL-1) were measured to generate a standard curve.

2.5. Adsorption of Aromatic Compounds

Benzene, toluene, and ethyl benzene, were dissolved in deionized water at a concentration of 1.0 ppm each. Then 20 mg of Fe-SBA-15 was added to the aqueous solution and sonicated at room temperature (approx. 20°C) for 30 s to form a homogeneous dispersion. After standing for 5 min, Fe-SBA-15 was collected from the dispersion using a magnet and the supernatant was discarded. The absorbed model compounds were eluted in 0.5 mL of methanol. Finally, 1.0 μL of the eluate was analyzed on a Varian (USA) CP-3380 gas chromatograph and the content of the aromatic compounds was calculated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FT-IR

Figure 2 shows FT-IR spectra of Fe(NO3)3, SBA-15, Fe(NO3)3-SBA-15, Fe2O3-SBA-15, and Fe-SBA-15. The IR vibration for the NO3 ion at 1385 cm-1 is evident in curves a and c, but not in b, indicating that Fe(NO3)3-SBA-15 was prepared successfully. Fe2O3-SBA-15 was obtained by transformation from the nitrate to the oxide form, as confirmed by the disappearance of the peak at 1385 cm-1 after calcination (curve d) [16]. The peak at 1385 cm-1 also disappeared after Fe2O3-SBA-15 reduction (curve e). The material was red after Fe(NO3)3-SBA-15 calcination at 750°C, suggesting that iron oxide is mainly in the form of α-Fe2O3 (hematite). Hematite is extremely stable under ambient conditions and is often the end product of the transformation of other iron oxides [17].

Figure 2: FT-IR spectra of (a) Fe(NO3)3, (b) SBA-15, (c) Fe(NO3)3-SBA-15, (d) Fe2O3-SBA-15, and (e) Fe-SBA-15.
3.2. XRD and MS

XRD patterns of the materials are shown in Figure 3. In the narrow-angle range peaks for SBA-15 are evident at 0.8°, 1.4° and 1.7°. For Fe-SBA-15, there is one prominent peak at 0.9° and two peaks at 1.5° and 1.8°. These results indicate that magnetic Fe-SBA-15 still has a high degree of hexagonal symmetry [1, 19] and retains the structure of SBA-15 after calcination at 750°C and reduction at 800°C, indicating that SBA-15 has good hydrothermal stability. Peaks for iron are evident at 44.6° and 65° in the wide-angle XRD pattern for Fe-SBA-15 [20, 21]. Other peaks can be attributed to Fe2O3, Fe3O4 or FeO [2024]. Residual iron oxides may be a result of surface passivation [20], which can be explained by the following equations for reduction of Fe2O3 with hydrogen [25]:3Fe2O3+H22Fe3O4+H2O,Fe3O4+4H23Fe+4H2O(1𝑥)Fe3O4+(14𝑥)H23Fe(1𝑥)O+(14𝑥)H2O,Fe(1𝑥)O+H2(1𝑥)Fe+H2O(1)

Figure 3: Powder XRD spectra for SBA-15 and Fe-SBA-15.

Figure 4 shows Mössbauer spectra of Fe-SBA-15 and Table 1 shows Mössbauer parameters of Fe-SBA-15. From the calculation of Fe Mössbauer spectra, the percentage of Fe, Fe(II), and Fe(III) in the prepared materials were 17.0%, 64.5%, and 18.5%, respectively. The above results could also confirm that the reduction process followed the equations and the reduction was not complete under this condition. Furthermore, it can be seen that the magnetic behavior of Fe-SBA-15 was contributed by Fe3O4.

Table 1: Mössbauer parameters of Fe-SBA-15.
Figure 4: Mössbauer spectra of Fe-SBA-15.
3.3. Nitrogen Adsorption-Desorption Measurements

Figure 5 shows nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms for the materials, which exhibit a typical type IV isotherm with an H1 hysteresis loop as defined by IUPAC [26]. The H1 hysteresis loop indicates that Fe-SBA-15 was still a mesoporous material. However, there was a shift in hysteresis position to lower relative pressure and a decreasing trend. The shift of the sharp inflection from 𝑃/𝑃0 0.60 to 0.80 is characteristic of a diameter in the mesopore range [27, 28]. Pore parameters for the materials are shown in Table 2. The BET surface area changed from 524 to 308 m2 g-1 and the pore diameter decreased from 72.8 to 72.6 Å on modification of SBA-15 with Fe. The decrease in surface area and pore diameter, probably caused by filling of the pores with small iron particles, indicates successful iron doping within the mesoporous channels of SBA-15 [29]. The pore diameter and 𝑑100 data for the two materials indicate that the mesopore uniformity of the parent SBA-15 silica was retained in the modified material [27].

Table 2: Pore parameters for SBA-15 and Fe-SBA-15.
Figure 5: Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms for SBA-15 and Fe-SBA-15.
3.4. SEM

SEM images of SBA-15 before and after modification are shown in Figure 6. Large fibrous structures of 30–80 μm in length and 10–20 μm in diameter are clearly evident in Figure 6. Compared to the parent SBA-15, the size of the modified material decreased on both a microscopic and macroscopic scale, suggesting that the particle size can change on ultrasonication.

Figure 6: SEM images of (a) SBA-15 and (b) Fe-SBA-15.
3.5. TEM

The TEM images in Figure 7 provide direct evidence that the material comprises well-ordered hexagonal arrays of mesopores (1D channel) and a 2D hexagonal structure [30]. The TEM image of Fe-SBA-15 (Figure 6(b)) shows that the structure is the same as in the parent SBA-15 silica. IR and nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements confirmed that iron was doped in SBA-15. TEM and XRD results also confirmed that modification occurred within pores and that the SBA-15 structure did not change. The modified material retained the mesopore uniformity of the original inorganic wall structure of the parent SBA-15 silica [27].

Figure 7: TEM images of (a) SBA-15 and (b) Fe-SBA-15 (circles indicate large iron metal particles).
3.6. Magnetic Behavior of Fe-SBA-15

Figure 8 shows that Fe-SBA-15 exhibited strong magnetic behavior with a magnetization value of 8.8 emu g-1, confirming that Fe-SBA-15 was magnetic with potential as a magnetic adsorbent for removal of aromatic compounds from water.

Figure 8: Magnetization curve for Fe-SBA-15.

Using AAS data, the iron content of Fe-SBA-15 was calculated as 𝐴=0.0794𝐶+0.0249 (𝑅=0.9993), where 𝐴 is the sample absorbance and 𝐶 is the sample concentration. The iron load was thus determined to be 19.1 wt.% in the modified material, in accordance with its strong magnetic behavior.

There are two possible explanations for the strong magnetic behavior of Fe-SBA-15. First, Fe-SBA-15 was prepared with a high content iron. Second, iron may aggregate in SBA-15 channels during calcination and reduction. Large iron metallic particles that formed in Fe-SBA-15 can be observed in Figure 6(b).

3.7. Adsorption of Aromatic Compounds

Figure 9 shows the magnetic separation process for magnetic Fe-SBA-15. Fe-SBA-15 was fully dispersed by reciprocating oscillation. After 5 min, a magnet was fixed to the vessel wall to attract the material. Following the absorption process, Fe-SBA-15 was redispersed in methanol to desorb the aromatic compounds and the efficiency of magnetic separation was assessed by GC.

Figure 9: Photographs of (a) dispersion and (b) magnetic separation of magnetic Fe-SBA-15.

Analytical data for benzene, toluene, and ethyl benzene compared to standards revealed removal of 90.6%, 88.7%, and 85.4%, respectively, demonstrating that Fe-SBA-15 can be used as a sorbent in water. It is worth noting that Fe-SBA-15 can be reused after washing several times with methanol and vacuum drying.

4. Conclusions

Magnetic Fe-SBA-15 was prepared from mesoporous silica molecular sieves via a simple iron ion doping of SBA-15, transformation to Fe2O3 and then reduction to magnetic iron particles using H2. Results confirm that the modified material retained the well-ordered hexagonal mesoporous structure after calcination at 800°C. Mesoporous silica materials may have further application potential, such as in sensing materials, solid supports, and nanobioelectronics, especially as magnetic sorbents allow the reuse of adsorbent materials for several cycles.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 20775029), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-07-0400), and the Central Teacher Plan of Lanzhou University.


  1. D. Zhao, J. Feng, Q. Huo et al., “Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5350, pp. 548–552, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Zhao, F. Gao, Y. Fu, W. Jin, P. Yang, and D. Zhao, “Biomolecule separation using large pore mesoporous SBA-15 as a substrate in high performance liquid chromatography,” Chemical Communications, no. 7, pp. 752–753, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. M. Liu, K. Hidajat, S. Kawi, and D. Y. Zhao, “A new class of hybrid mesaporous materials with functionalized organic monolayers for selective adsorption of heavy metal ions,” Chemical Communications, no. 13, pp. 1145–1146, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Huang, C. Yang, H. Zhang, and M. Liu, “Preparation and characterization of octyl and octadecyl-modified mesoporous SBA-15 silica molecular sieves for adsorption of dimethyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 111, no. 1–3, pp. 254–259, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Tian, J. Sun, H. Zhang et al., “Large-pore mesoporous SBA-15 silica particles with submicrometer size as stationary phases for high-speed CEC separation,” Electrophoresis, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 742–748, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. Zhang, R. Liu, Y. Hu, and G. Li, “Microwave heating in preparation of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer beads for trace triazines analysis in complicated samples,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 967–976, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Jin, R. Li, H. Wang, H. Chen, K. Liang, and J. Ma, “Magnetic Fe nanoparticle functionalized water-soluble multi-walled carbon nanotubules towards the preparation of sorbent for aromatic compounds removal,” Chemical Communications, no. 4, pp. 386–388, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Deng, W. Yang, C. Wang, and S. Fu, “A novel approach for preparation of thermoresponsive polymer magnetic microspheres with core-shell structure,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 1729–1732, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Deng, C. Deng, D. Yang, C. Wang, S. Fu, and X. Zhang, “Preparation, characterization and application of magnetic silica nanoparticle functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes,” Chemical Communications, no. 44, pp. 5548–5550, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. AN. H. Lu, W. Schmidt, N. Matoussevitch et al., “Nanoengineering of a magnetically separable hydrogenation catalyst,” Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, vol. 43, no. 33, pp. 4303–4306, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. AN. H. Lu, W. C. Li, A. Kiefer et al., “Fabrication of magnetically separable mesostructured silica with an open pore system,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 28, pp. 8616–8617, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Du, S. Liu, Y. Ji, Y. Zhang, NI. Xiao, and F. S. Xiao, “Ordered mesoporous silica materials (SBA-15) with good heat-resistant magnetism,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 320, no. 13, pp. 1932–1936, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. X. Jin, L. Li, N. J. Chu et al., “Magnetic properties of nanocomposite Fe-doped SBA-15 magnetic materials,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 112–114, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. S. Jung, K. H. Choi, Y. K. Jung et al., “Preparation and characterization of γ-FeO nanoparticles in SBA15 host material,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 272–276, no. 1, pp. e1157–e1159, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. H. P. Yiu, M. A. Keane, Z. A. D. Lethbridge, M. R. Lees, A. J. El Haj, and J. Dobson, “Synthesis of novel magnetic iron metal-silica (Fe-SBA-15) and magnetite-silica (FeO-SBA-15) nanocomposites with a high iron content using temperature-programed reduction,” Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 25, Article ID 255606, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Huwe and M. Fröba, “Synthesis and characterization of transition metal and metal oxide nanoparticles inside mesoporous carbon CMK-3,” Carbon, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 304–314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. S. Teja and P.-Y. Koh, “Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles,” Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 22–45, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Vradman, L. Titelman, and M. Herskowitz, “Size effect on SBA-15 microporosity,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 93, no. 1–3, pp. 313–317, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Sayari, B. H. Han, and Y. Yang, “Simple synthesis route to monodispersed SBA-15 silica rods,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 44, pp. 14348–14349, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Lv, Y. Xu, D. Wu, and Y. Sun, “Preparation and magnetic properties of spindle porous iron nanoparticles,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 961–965, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Gervasini, C. Messi, P. Carniti, A. Ponti, N. Ravasio, and F. Zaccheria, “Insight into the properties of Fe oxide present in high concentrations on mesoporous silica,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 224–234, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. -S. Chou and S. -J. Lee, “Facile methods to synthesize nanaosized iron oxide colloidal dispersion and its characterization,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 336, no. 1–3, pp. 23–28, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. Wang, C. S. Liu, F. B. Li, C. P. Liu, and J. B. Liang, “Photodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pyrene by iron oxide in solid phase,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 162, no. 2-3, pp. 716–723, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Lv, Y. Xu, D. Wu, and Y. Sun, “Preparation and properties of magnetic iron oxide nanotubes,” Particuology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 334–339, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Pineau, N. Kanari, and I. Gaballah, “Kinetics of reduction of iron oxides by H. Part I: low temperature reduction of hematite,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 447, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. S. W. Sing, D. H. Everett, R. A. W. Haul et al., “Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 603–619, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  27. Z. Luan, J. A. Fournier, J. B. Wooten, and D. E. Miser, “Preparation and characterization of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane-modified mesoporous SBA-15 silica molecular sieves,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 83, no. 1–3, pp. 150–158, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. L. Doadrio, E. M. B. Sousa, J. C. Doadrio, J. Pérez Pariente, I. Izquierdo-Barba, and M. Vallet-Regí, “Mesoporous SBA-15 HPLC evaluation for controlled gentamicin drug delivery,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. A. Mirji, S. B. Halligudi, D. P. Sawant et al., “Adsorption of octadecyltrichlorosilane on mesoporous SBA-15,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 252, no. 12, pp. 4097–4103, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Hoffmann, U. Mayer, and A. Krischanitz, “Structure of alkylsiloxane monolayers on silicon surfaces investigated by external reflection infrared spectroscopy,” Langmuir, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1304–1312, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus