Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry

Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 2030675 |

Patrizia Bocchetta, Carolina Ramírez Sánchez, Antonietta Taurino, Benedetto Bozzini, "Accurate Assessment of the Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalytic Activity of Mn/Polypyrrole Nanocomposites Based on Rotating Disk Electrode Measurements, Complemented with Multitechnique Structural Characterizations", Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, vol. 2016, Article ID 2030675, 16 pages, 2016.

Accurate Assessment of the Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalytic Activity of Mn/Polypyrrole Nanocomposites Based on Rotating Disk Electrode Measurements, Complemented with Multitechnique Structural Characterizations

Academic Editor: Chih-Ching Huang
Received21 Aug 2016
Revised18 Oct 2016
Accepted19 Oct 2016
Published30 Nov 2016


This paper reports on the quantitative assessment of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalytic activity of electrodeposited Mn/polypyrrole (PPy) nanocomposites for alkaline aqueous solutions, based on the Rotating Disk Electrode (RDE) method and accompanied by structural characterizations relevant to the establishment of structure-function relationships. The characterization of Mn/PPy films is addressed to the following: (i) morphology, as assessed by Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM); (ii) local electrical conductivity, as measured by Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM); and (iii) molecular structure, accessed by Raman Spectroscopy; these data provide the background against which the electrocatalytic activity can be rationalised. For comparison, the properties of Mn/PPy are gauged against those of graphite, PPy, and polycrystalline-Pt (poly-Pt). Due to the literature lack of accepted protocols for precise catalytic activity measurement at poly-Pt electrode in alkaline solution using the RDE methodology, we have also worked on the obtainment of an intralaboratory benchmark by evidencing some of the time-consuming parameters which drastically affect the reliability and repeatability of the measurement.

1. Introduction

Notwithstanding the astonishing discrepancies among the ORR activities reported from different laboratories and typically attributed to experimental protocols, electrode conditioning, and current-potential curves corrections [1], the RDE technique—together with the RDDE one—seems to be the method most used by the electrochemists to characterize ORR electrocatalysts. The reasons are simplicity and speed of the measurements as well as commercial availability and low cost of all the required facilities. For this specific electroanalytic application, poly-Pt can be considered as a standard electrode that, notwithstanding the intrinsically poorly defined nature of a polycrystalline surface, exhibits a very robust and reproducible electrochemical response. Moreover, since standardized disks of poly-Pt are commercially available at convenient costs, their use as benchmark electrodes for the ORR electrocatalytic studies seems appropriate. At present, ORR at Pt RDE electrodes of different forms (wires, gauzes, foils, and disks of different areas) has been widely investigated in acid solution [13], due to their relevance in polymer electrolyte fuel cells [4]. On the contrary marginal attention has been paid to pure Pt in alkaline solutions (single crystal Pt [5, 6], poly-Pt particles [7], poly-Pt wire [8], poly-Pt thin film [911], and poly-Pt rod [6, 1214]) despite the fact that ORR plays a key role in the chlor-alkali technology and in metal-air batteries [15, 16]. Due to the absence of an interlaboratory benchmark material in alkaline solution and the discrepancies in the few data available at the moment [6, 1214], we have realized an intralaboratory poly-Pt benchmark against which the data gathered with novel ones can be safely gauged.

Limited interest for Pt as ORR electrocatalyst in alkaline solution is probably justified by high costs, less aggressive chemical conditions, and lower catalytic activity and efficiency due to generation [17]. For these reasons, research in alkaline ORR has been centred on catalysts featuring nonnoble metals [18] such as palladium [19], ruthenium [20], iron [21, 22], nickel and cobalt mainly in the form of spinels [2326], perovskites [27, 28], and manganese oxides [14, 2936]. In particular, are the most studied systems for applications in metal/air batteries [16, 37, 38] owing to their low cost, adequate electrochemical stability, and good catalytic activity towards the decomposition of species produced by the ORR pathway in alkaline solution [30, 31]. One of the main limits of -based ORR electrocatalysts is their poor electrical conductivity: to overcome this problem commercial air cathodes have to be fabricated by combining oxides with conducting materials, mainly carbon nanoparticles [39]. Among other approaches favouring electronic contact to , the dispersion of metal oxide particles in a polypyrrole (PPy) matrix is also appealing for a series of physicochemical reasons, detailed in [4043]. Among Mn/PPy fabrication routes, electrodeposition offers the possibility of forming directly Mn particles into the polymer layer [44, 45] or of entrapping metal complexes that yield metal particles during a subsequent reduction step [46]. The first studies that have demonstrated the possibility of increasing the mixed oxide conductivity by using PPy [40] also showed that the deposition of alternating layers of PPy and MnCu or NiCu oxide spinel particles protects the catalytic sites against dissolution during ORR operation. Recently, an alternative facile synthesis of composite metal oxide/PPy electrocatalysts has been proposed, based on one-pot electrodeposition onto conductive substrates [4752].

In this paper we have focused on the quantitative and reproducible assessment of the ORR activity of electrodeposited Mn/PPy nanocomposites in aqueous alkaline ambient, by using poly-Pt electrodes as intralaboratory benchmark material. The electrocatalytic results are complemented by a morphological and structural characterization of our materials by FE-SEM, AFM, conductivity-probe SPM, and Raman Spectroscopy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Electrodes

The Mn/PPy electrodeposition bath contains the following: 0.1 M pyrrole, 25 mM MnCl2, 0.1 M tetrabutyl-ammonium-perchlorate (TBAP), and 1% v/v H2O dissolved in acetonitrile. Acetonitrile, MnCl2·4H2O, pyrrole, and TBAP were supplied by Aldrich. Before each PPy electrodeposition experiment, the pyrrole monomer was distilled under rotary pump vacuum several times (typically three) until it becomes colourless. All the solutions were prepared with ultrapure water from a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Vimodrone (MI), Italy), exhibiting a resistivity of 18.2 M cm. Polycrystalline-Pt (Poly-Pt) rod was mechanically polished with different grades of grit paper, down to 0.05 m diamond paste, and then accurately rinsed with double-distilled water. To guarantee an initial reproducible surface, the working electrode was held for 5 s at 1.40 V/RHE, a potential which a full coverage of platinum surface by O-containing species is attained to, followed by an electroreduction step to 1.13 V/RHE for 1 min [9]. The surface of the graphite (G) was treated according to the following procedure: (i) polishing to mirror finish; (ii) 10 min ultrasonication (US) in ultrapure H2O; (iii) repolishing to mirror finish; (iv) 10 min US in acetone US; and (v) 10 min US in ultrapure H2O. Electrochemical synthesis was performed using a three-electrode cell with a graphite disk ( mm), as working electrode (WE), a Pt wire as counter electrode (CE), and an aqueous silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl/3 M: 0.209 V/NHE) as reference electrode (RE). All potentials are reported versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale.

2.2. Electrochemical Measurements and Methods

The electrochemical measurements were carried out at room temperature using a ParStat 2273 potentiostat. The Mn/PPy catalysts were synthesized in deaerated electrodeposition baths. Electrodeposition was carried out with the pulsed potential procedure described in previous works [47, 48, 50, 51] optimized in view of growing a composite consisting of two constituents that are formed anodically (PPy and Mn(III, IV) compounds) and cathodically (Mn(0) and/or precipitated Mn(II) containing species). The initial step (0.971 V/RHE) does not lead to faradaic reactions, but it is required to relax the compositional double layer. After this relaxation step, a layer of PPy is electrodeposited during the first anodic pulse (2.17 V). During the subsequent cathodic pulse (0.829 V), reduced Mn(0) or precipitated Mn(II) species can be incorporated into PPy. In the final anodic step of each cycle (2.17 V), another layer of—possibly Mn-doped—PPy is deposited. After electrochemical synthesis, the films were rinsed with pure acetone and dried at room temperature.

2.3. Morphological Characterization

The morphology of Mn/PPy catalyst electrodeposited onto graphite discs was investigated by Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) using an NVISION 40 Zeiss, equipped with a high resolution Gemini Field-Emission Gun and with an Oxford INCA 350 Xact Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) Spectrometer. Details about the morphological features at the nanoscale and quantitative analysis of roughness and surface area were obtained with a Nanoscope III Multimode Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) (Bruker) in air using the ScanAsyst mode and the ScanAsyst probe (Bruker). On each sample 5 different square areas of sizes 1, 5, and 20 m were scanned at rates of 0.7 and 1.5 Hz. The electrical conductivity of the sample was mapped by the PeakForce TUNA Module (Bruker) using a Pt/Ir probe (PF-TUNA 0.4 N/m, Bruker). AFM image analysis was carried out with the Nanoscope Analysis 1.5 program (Bruker).

2.4. Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectra were recorded using a LabRam microprobe confocal system. A 10x long-working distance objective was used and the excitation line at 632.8 nm was provided by a 12 mW He-Ne laser. The slit and pinhole were set at 200 and 400 m, respectively, corresponding to a scattering volume of ~3 pL; Raman spectra were acquired with a 600 grid/mm spectrometer. The recorded Raman intensities are directly proportional to the discharge current of the CCD detector.

2.5. ORR Electrocatalytic Measurements

Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) linear sweep voltammetries (LSV) on Mn-PPy/C electrodes were recorded to evaluate the catalytic activity in an O2-saturated (SIAD 6.0) 0.1 M KOH electrolyte at quasi-steady-state (5 mV s−1) at different Rotating Disk Electrode (RDE) rotation speeds. Graphite disks with Mn/PPy electrodeposit were mounted in a Rotating Disk Electrode System (ParStat Model 2273, Photo Analytical S.R.L., Settala (MI), Italy). The same electrochemical experiments were duplicated with solutions that had been deoxygenated by N2 saturation. The current densities are referred to the electrode geometric area (1.326 cm2). O2 was bubbled for 20 min into the solution before the measurements and an O2 blanket was kept above the electrolyte during the measurement. In order to minimize disturbing effects of bubbles during the experiments, the electrolyte saturation has been performed at open circuit for 20 min and the pipette allowing gas into the solution was raised during the RDE measurement leaving a gas blanket over the solution. Special care was taken to avoid contingent ambient air suction into the analysis compartment caused by the electrode rotation. The ORR Levich slopes were estimated from current-voltage curves which the N2-background had been subtracted from.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The RDE Measurement
3.1.1. Theoretical Aspects

As it is well known from the literature [53], RDE is an electrochemical technique based on controlled electrolyte convection, leading to a well characterized fluid velocity distribution on the working electrode, provided that appropriate boundary conditions are implemented in cell and electrode mounting as well as in the real shaft rotation process. In the RDE method a discoidal electrode (e.g., glassy carbon or platinum), embedded in a rod of an insulating material (e.g., glass or Teflon), connected to a motor, rotates at a certain frequency , where ω is the angular velocity (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The RDE technique operates on the principle of controllable stationary limiting currents, where the diffusion layer at the electrode maintains its thickness constant over time. To this end, the effective electrode surface and the scan rate are kept to values in correspondence of which double-layer charging produces a vanishing current. Under these hypotheses, the mass transfer process can be described with simple equations that allow correlating the experimental parameters to the mass transfer of reactants to the electrode surface. When an electrode is rotated, mass transfer of reactants and products is governed by convective-diffusion mechanisms. At the RDE the hydrodynamic flow pattern results from centrifugal forces that move the liquid horizontally out and away from the centre of the disk (Figure 1(c)) while fresh solution continually replaces it by a flow normal to the electrode surface (Figure 1(a)). Of course, for these condition to hold true, a set of conditions have to be met, the details of which are provided, for example, in [53].

The convective-diffusion equations imply the existence of a diffusion layer of quiescent electrolyte on the electrode surface, within which mass transfer takes place only by diffusion. Outside this layer of thickness , the convection maintains the concentrations of all species uniform and equal to the bulk values (Figure 1(d)). According to this model, by introducing the adjustable parameter , the convection problem is formally treated as a diffusional one [54]. O2 diffusion to the catalyst surface may thus be modelled as illustrated in Figure 1(d): O2 diffuses through the boundary layer () in the electrolyte solution yielding a controlled O2 flux/limiting current. In the relevant geometry the steady-state convective-diffusion equation with mass-transport controlled source term can be solved analytically, yielding the Koutecky–Levich (K–L) equations [54]:where is the kinetic current density; the diffusion–limiting current density; the measured current density; the reciprocal of the slope; the angular velocity of the disk; the Faraday constant; the saturation concentration of O2 in 0.1 M KOH at room temperature (1.2 10−6 mol cm−3); the diffusion coefficient of oxygen in water (1.73 10−5 cm2 s−1); the kinematic viscosity of the solution at room temperature (0.01 cm2 s−1) [55]; and the electron transfer number.

3.1.2. Methodological Aspects

The literature survey on ORR at poly-Pt electrode in alkaline solution using the RDE methodology is limited and not consistent [6, 1214]; therefore a definite comparison between the new developed Mn-PPy material and the state-of-the-art electrocatalysts is not allowed. As a consequence, we have worked to obtain an intralaboratory benchmark (poly-Pt rod) not aiming at proposing a standard RDE curve usable as reference for general activity of poly-Pt (to do that a dedicated work of analysis on the different parameters affecting the ORR activity is necessary, together with interlaboratory testing; this kind of work is actually a challenge especially in alkaline solution) but only at acquiring an internal reference on the basis of which our novel data can be safely evaluated. In Section 3.1.2’s () and () the effects of (i) the distance () between the catalytic surface and the electrolyte-free surface and (ii) the initial features of the catalyst surface on the reliability and reproducibility of the ORR measurements at RDE are discussed. Other experimental issues, such as glassware electrolyte impurity levels and uncompensated electrolyte resistance, slightly affect the results with errors less than the 2%, while dirty sliding electric contact of the rotator is responsible for a strong increase in the signal-to-noise ratio of the LSV curve (Figure 2(a), red curves).

() Electrochemical Cell Design. The electrochemical cell design significantly affects the hydrodynamic conditions of the electrolyte that must satisfy the above mentioned conditions (Section 3.1.1) to allow quantitative analysis according to the Levich equation. The cell and experimental conditions must be therefore designed so that the solution flow within the cell becomes laminar. In this work, we report a detailed cell design (see the scheme reported in Figure 1(a)) associated with the RDE voltammetric curves of ORR at poly-Pt and Mn/PPy catalysts in 0.1 M KOH. In our experiments, we have evidenced that the determination of the distance () between the catalytic surface and the electrolyte-free surface (i.e., the electrolyte volume) radically improves the quality of RDE voltammetries due to achieved laminar flow at the reacting electrode surface. The optimal value was determined by experimental calibration and found to be 30 mm, corresponding to a volume of the electrolyte of 80 mL (Figure 2(a)). In Figure 2(b) it can be observed that the effect of on the LSV curve is to modify (i) the Butler-Volmer behaviour under mixed kinetic control in the intermediate potential region and (ii) the curve repeatability. In Table 1 the scatter of current density values (standard deviation) obtained from repeated measurements at the same rotation rates is shown. Low values find out a low reproducibility because, due to the turbulence effects, the diffusion limited conditions are neither constant nor controllable during the potential scan. As a consequence, the limiting current determination is not possible without making fundamental errors.

Applied potential, V/RHECurrent density, mA cm−2
 mm mm
Average valueStandard deviationAverage valueStandard deviation


() Initial Electrode Conditions. It is well known that the state and coverage of oxygen-containing species on platinum are a crucial factor in determining the electrocatalytic activity of platinum surfaces towards O2 reduction [9]. For this reason, the reproducibility of the initial surface of poly-Pt was assured by holding the electrode for 5 s at 1.40 V/RHE, a potential which a full coverage of platinum surface by O-containing species is attained at, followed by an electroreduction step at 1.13 V/RHE for 1 min [9]. The effect of this pretreatment reported in Figure 2(a) (blue curves) is to shift the onset and half-wave potential to more positive values. At low overpotentials the surface of untreated Pt is covered of oxygen intermediates strongly bonded with Pt that affect the activation energy of the ORR process, hindering the proton and electron transfer, while at high overpotentials their influence becomes negligible because the stability of the oxygen bond decreases and the ORR may proceed (the two curves overlap).

The surface initial conditions of Mn/PPy electrocatalyst are strictly related to the morphochemical goodness of the electrodeposit; this aspect is thoroughly discussed in Section 3.3 where the morphological and molecular structure of Mn/PPy materials has been characterized by FE-SEM, AFM, conductivity-probe SPM, and Raman Spectroscopy in view of ORR performance evaluation.

3.2. The RDE Experiment at Poly-Pt Electrode in 0.1 M KOH

Poly-Pt rod has been used as intralaboratory benchmark material in alkaline solution for the study of ORR at Mn-PPy/G catalyst. The electrode (Figure 1(b)) has been pretreated using the protocol described in Section 3.1.2.(). In Figure 3(a) we report ORR quasi-steady-state voltammograms of poly-Pt rod at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 in O2-saturated 0.1 KOH aqueous solutions at different RDE rotation speeds. Stable and reproducible voltammograms were obtained following the experimental details discussed in Section 3.1. At low overpotentials (0–0.2 V/RHE) the curves are independent of the rotation speed, , being the electrode kinetics governed by the charge transfer. At higher overpotentials instead, the increase of current density with potential becomes slower, as expected for an electrochemical reaction under mixed control, until the mass-transport kinetic contributions become significant and determine the appearance of a current plateau, which thus strongly depends on . Sometimes a slight hump at 0.20 V is observed and presumably attributed to H-adatom adsorption on platinum [13]. In agreement with the Levich equation (see (2)) the height of this plateau increases linearly with the square root of as shown in Figure 3(b). The slopes of the linear fit lines to the experimental Levich plots were used to estimate according to (1) in a range of electrode potentials that are representative of practical electrocatalytic operation and reported in Figure 3(c). values, averaged in the potential range , were found to be , suggesting the prevalence of ORR four-electron mechanism typical of platinum.

The charge-transfer kinetic is shown in the Tafel plots of Figure 3(d), where ORR kinetic current is estimated according to (: limiting current density). The Tafel slope is approximately 60 mV dec−1 in agreement with literature for Pt under alkaline conditions (0.1–6.0 M KOH) in the low overpotential region [1013, 56]. This value, close to  mV/dec (where is the molar gas constant, the absolute temperature, the transfer coefficient, and the Faraday constant) at room temperature [57, 58], indicates that the transfer of the first electron catalysed by Pt is probably the rate-determining step.

3.3. Characterization of Mn-PPy/G ORR Catalyst
3.3.1. Morphological and Structural Characterization

The morphological, compositional, and chemical-state distribution of the as-deposited Mn/PPy material, using the same electrodeposition procedure employed for this investigation, has been studied in detail by soft X-ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping and microabsorption spectroscopy (micro-XAS) in a previous paper of ours [51]. This analysis disclosed a rather homogeneous Mn spatial distribution that is consistent in a rather wide range of current densities, while micro-XAS has revealed that the potentiostatic pulsed codeposition process—alternating anodic and cathodic polarization intervals—leads to a PPy deposit containing manganese (II, III, IV) oxyhydroxides and traces of Mn(0). A granular morphology was found in all the analyzed regions, with colocation of Mn, N, and O, denoting the fact that and polypyrrole act as nucleation centres for material electrodeposited in both the anodic and cathodic pulses. This is in agreement with the classical nucleation and growth mechanism for electrodeposition by pulse-plating [59]. In this paper, we have assessed the morphological structure of the G substrate, of a pure PPy deposit after 60 electrodeposition cycles (PPy60/G), Mn/PPy after 60 cycles (Mn-PPy60/G), and Mn/PPy after 240 cycles (Mn-PPy240/G).

() FE-SEM and EDX Analyses. FE-SEM analysis has been used to assess the distribution of the deposit over the whole electrode area. Figure 4 reports the in-plane morphology at low magnification of the G, PPy/G, and Mn-PPy240/G samples. The G substrate, treated as specified in Section 2.1, shows a highly structured morphology with a high surface area (Figure 4(a)); the electropolymerization of PPy leads to a film covering uniformly the G electrode (Figure 4(b)) while a uniform distribution of Mn-containing nanoparticles is disclosed after electrodeposition of Mn/PPy (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). The presence of Mn has been positively assessed by EDX analysis, a typical spectrum is shown in Figure 4(e).

() AFM and PF-TUNA Analysis. AFM analysis has been used to obtain quantitative morphological information on the surface: average grains size (), average roughness (), and the real surface area (data summarized in Table 1). PF-TUNA analysis has been also performed to map the electrical conductivity.

Figure 5 reports AFM height images of G substrate and of the following electrodeposits: PPy60/G, Mn-PPy60/G, and Mn-PPy240/G. The AFM images of graphite substrate confirm the presence of a highly structured morphology and provide quantitative information on the roughness and surface area (Table 2). The electrodeposition of PPy for 60 cycles to cover the graphite surface with a closely packed population of globules having a mean diameter of  nm: a concomitant reduction of the surface area by ca. 25% is recorded after the electropolymerization process (Table 2). The PPy globular structure shown in Figure 5(a) is typical for PPy thicknesses below 1 m [60], such as in our sample, the mean thickness of which () has been estimated to be 0.9 m (in good agreement with literature [61]) from the electrical charge () associated with pyrrole oxidation by application of Faraday’s law and assuming 100% current efficiency for polypyrrole formation according to , where is the molar mass of the repetitive unit (67.09 g mol−1), the Faraday constant (96,500 C mol−1), the electrical charge, the working electrode area (1.326 cm2), the density of the polymer (1.5 g cm−3), and the electron loss (2.25) [62, 63]. By adding Mn2+ ions to the pyrrole-containing electrolyte and using the same number of electrodeposition cycles (60), the electrodeposition process is no longer able to produce a polymer film covering homogeneously the whole electrode surface. The AFM height images of the Mn-PPy60/G show that the surface is irregular with some uncovered areas and a roughness value that is intermediate between those of G and PPy60/G (Table 2). Of course, the morphology and metal distribution of Mn/PPy composites are affected by a wide range of parameters in a complex way, such as the electronic conductivity of PPy, doping degree, polymer porosity, metal ion transport within the PPy network structure, and chemical interactions between metal ions and their complexes with the polymer. This is chiefly instanced by the spread in values shown in Table 2, since this parameter is the most sensitive to the presence of peaks and valleys among the selected morphology indicators [64]. The morphology of electrodeposited Mn/PPy films improves by increasing the number of cycles to 240: in fact sample Mn-Py240/G is notably more compact and uniform coherently with SEM analysis (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). In the AFM height images of Figure 4(c) the comparison between the samples Mn-PPy60/G and Mn-PPy240/G can be better appreciated at low magnification (20 × 20 m2). The thicker sample shows the presence of particles with diameters of  nm, uniformly distributed over the whole surface. It is worth noting that the surface area of Mn-PPy240/G and that of the film-covered areas of Mn-PPy60/G are similar. The quality of the Mn-PPy240/G deposit is coherent with the superior ORR performance, discussed in Section 3.4.

SampleIdeally flatGraphite (G)PPy on graphite (PPy/G)Mn/PPy on graphite (Mn-PPy60/G)Mn/PPy on graphite (Mn-PPy240/G)

Particle size/nm//
Surface area/m2100

= average roughness.
= root mean square roughness.

Figure 6 shows typical topography (a) and current (b) images obtained simultaneously from the surface of the Mn-PPy240/G film. The current image clearly shows that the nanocomposite exhibits heterogeneous surface conductivity. By comparing Figures 6(a) and 6(b) one can straightforwardly conclude that the top regions of the particles are not conductive while current preferentially flows at the border of the particles. This finding suggests that the grain can be composed of poorly conductive manganese oxides, with PPy in the reduced state, coherently with XRF mapping and micro-XAS analysis [51] as well as Raman Spectroscopy (see next section). Moreover, our results are in keeping with a previous study, showing that the top of PPy globules is preferentially reduced during electrodeposition [60].

() Raman Spectroscopy. Micro-Raman Spectroscopy has been employed to characterize the PPy60/G, Mn-PPy60/G, and Mn-PPy240/G samples. In Figure 7(a) the Raman spectra of all PPy-containing samples display the typical prominent PPy bands [48]. Two of the three characteristic bands associated with the reduced/undoped (994, 1052 cm−1) and to the oxidized/doped form (938, 1090 cm−1) of PPy can also be appreciated. The other bands at 1564 cm−1 (reduced) and 1612 cm−1 (oxidized) are overwhelmed by the graphite signal. As is well documented in literature, the oxidation/reduction processes of PPy involve the fully reduced state (PP0), the oxidized state bipolaron (PP2+) and the intermediate oxidized state polaron (PPy+•) according to . The bands located at about 994 and 938 cm−1 belong to ring deformations associated with bipolaron (dication) and polaron (radical cation), respectively [65, 66], while the two peaks revealed at about 1090 and 1052 cm−1 can be attributed to the N–H in-plane deformation of oxidized and reduced polypyrrole state [67]. In the composite Mn/PPy samples some peaks appear in the range 100–800 cm−1 and become more intense in the thicker sample, where the Raman signal increases presumably due to the SERS effect discussed in [49]. According to the literature, the bands in the range 200–500 cm−1(see also Figure 7(b)) can be attributed to the Mn–O–Mn bending mode in the MnO2 lattice and those in the range 500–700 cm−1 to the Mn–O stretching of octahedral MnO6 groups [6871]. The main band at 692 cm−1 is typically attributed to Mn2O3 [71], while the 625 cm−1 feature is reported as the main band of -MnO2 [71] and the one at 143 cm−1 is reported to be the B1g mode of rutile-type -MnO2 [71]. The concomitant presence of the four features at 315, 368, 499, and 656 cm−1 is usually ascribed to Mn3O4 [71, 72], but some of these bands can also appear in MnO2 [71, 73], Mn2O3 [72], or MnO [72, 74]. Even though the positions of Raman bands alone are not enough to support a conclusive speciation of Mn oxides not only owing to the intrinsic complexity of these vibrational spectra [68] but also owing to inconsistent literature in the field [75, 76], our Raman results, in combination with previous micro-XAS data [51], definitively prove that the electrodeposition process yields a mixture of Mn(II, III, IV) oxides.

3.4. The RDE Experiment at G, G/PPy, and Mn-PPy/G Electrodes in 0.1 M KOH

The ORR electrocatalytic activity of the G substrate and that of electrodeposited PPy/G and Mn-PPy/G films have been evaluated through RDE measurements at different rotation speeds in 0.1 M KOH solution (Figures 8 and 9). The RDE steady-state voltammograms shown in Figures 8(a)8(c) and 9(a) have been replicated three times at every rotation speed to check the electrode stability. In order to evaluate the catalytic efficiency comprehensively, electrocatalytic figures of merit have been estimated from RDE polarization curves obtained at 1600 rpm. The G substrate shows the two typical ORR waves reported for graphite in alkaline conditions [77]. In particular, the RDE polarization curve reported in [78] for bare graphite in an O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution at 1600 rpm fits very well with our curve reported in Figure 8(a). The Koutecky–Levich plots (Figure 8(d)) at different electrode potentials display good linearity and the slopes are constant over the potential range from 0 to 0.9 V/RHE, providing an electron transfer number around 2.3, independent of potential. This finding suggests that ORR on graphite in alkaline solution proceeds principally by the two-electron transfer to give peroxide ions and that no further reduction of occurs, as generally accepted in literature [77, 79]. The current density in the LSV curves shown in Figure 8(a) has been calculated considering the geometric area of the graphite electrode; we have not considered the effective surface area estimated by AFM (Table 2) because for ORR electrocatalysts the impact of pore diameter can be more important than that of surface area [80] since micropores can be inactive [81].

The RDE curves recorded with PPy60/G and Mn-PPy60/G electrodes show a double wave structure that is less pronounced than the one observed with the bare graphite electrode (Figures 8(b), 8(c), and 9(a)). With the increasing of the rotation speed, the diffusion limited current plateau becomes inclined and this slope increases. This behaviour is quite common in the literature for carbon-based catalysts (pyrolyzed Mn, Co, Fe/PPy [47], Ag–MnO2 [82], pyrolyzed Fe(III)-tetramethoxyphenyl porphyrin [21], pyrolyzed cobalt [83] and iron phthalocyanine [84], and N-doped carbon nanotubes [85]) and has been attributed to the a heterogeneous distribution of the active sites on the surface catalyst [86, 87]. The ORR performance of our PPy60/G film is superior to that of PPy prepared by a polymerization process via chemical oxidation with FeCl3 [88]: both the onset () and half-wave () potentials shift to more positive values, from 0.72 to 0.85 V/RHE and from 0.34 to 0.69 V/RHE, respectively. Moreover, the current density at 0.5 V/RHE increases from 1.8 to 2.2 mA cm−2. The K–L results (, Table 2) suggest that the O2 reduction at PPy60/G follows a combination of (reduction of O2 to ) and (O2 is directly reduced to OH) reactions. Coherently with the rather heterogeneous morphology observed by AFM (Section 3.3.1’s ()), the ORR performance of the Mn-PPy60/G catalyst is not significantly improved with respect to that of the Mn-free PPy60/G sample and the number of exchanged electron returns to a value of 2.25, similar to that of graphite, while the current density decreases notably (Table 2). The RDE analyses conducted on the Mn-PPy240/G sample, exhibiting the best morphology, are reported in Figure 9. The Koutecky–Levich plots and the correspondent values at selected potentials (Figures 9(b) and 9(c)) indicate that oxygen reduction process is favoured similarly to poly-Pt electrode in the same ambient. In addition, and potentials increase with respect to all the other samples reaching values very similar to poly-Pt (Table 3) and carbon/PPy materials [89]. On the contrary, the current density of the Mn-PPy240/G sample in the whole potential range analyzed is lower with respect to the benchmark poly-Pt. The expected lower catalytic activity of Mn/PPy with respect to poly-Pt is also evidenced in the Tafel plots of Figures 3(d) (poly-Pt) and 8(d) (Mn-PPy240/G). The Tafel slope for the Mn-PPy240/G is ca. 122 mV dec−1, notably higher than that found for ploy-Pt: ca. 50 mV dec−1, and suggests an electron transfer mechanism with adsorption molecular oxygen as the rate-determining step [47]. These values are in agreement with the literature, reporting values close to 120 mV dec−1 for Mn oxides (114 mV dec−1 for -MnO2/C [90], 120 mV dec−1 for high load/C [91]).

WE , V/RHE , V/RHE at  V/RHE/mA cm−2 at 0.8 V

PPy on graphite (PPy/G)0.850.692.16
Mn-PPy on graphite (Mn-PPy60/G)0.8460.651
Mn-PPy on graphite (Mn-PPy240/G)0.90.7141.65

4. Conclusions

Poly-Pt has been characterized as intralaboratory benchmark material for the assessment of the ORR electrocatalytic activity of Mn/polypyrrole nanocomposites based on RDE measurements. Accurate electrocatalytic data of Mn/PPy film—complemented with structural and morphological characterizations (FE-SEM, AFM, and Raman)—have been used to disentangle intrinsic electroactivity factors from surface coverage effects and have allowed optimizing the electrodeposition process parameters in view of global electrocatalytic activity. In particular, Mn/PPy grown with 240 electrodeposition cycles leads to the formation of continuous film catalytic particles ca. 120 nm in diameter. AFM PF-TUNA current imaging shows that the top region of these particles—probably consisting of and reduced PPy—are poorly conductive and that the current preferentially flows at their border, where—owing to the prevailing current density distribution—polypyrrole is mainly in the oxidized state. These results are coherent with previous XRF mapping and micro-XAS analysis and with Raman Spectroscopy results reported in this paper that confirm the presence of the characteristic bands associated with the reduced/undoped and with the oxidized/doped form of PPy and of . High-quality Mn/PPy electrodeposits exhibit a superior electrocatalytic activity due to higher four-electron-transfer selectivity for the ORR in alkaline solution, with respect to materials of the same chemistry grown suboptimal electrodeposition parameters. Moreover, optimized Mn/PPy exhibits electrocatalytic figures of merit such as and potentials that are similar to those of poly-Pt, even though at lower nominal current densities.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors are grateful to Professor Giovanna Giacalone for her accurate English revision throughout the manuscript.


  1. K. Shinozaki, J. W. Zack, R. M. Richards, B. S. Pivovar, and S. S. Kocha, “Oxygen reduction reaction measurements on platinum electrocatalysts utilizing rotating disk electrode technique. I. Impact of impurities, measurement protocols and applied corrections,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 162, no. 10, pp. F1144–F1158, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. J. Roethlein and H. J. R. Maget, “The electrochemical reduction of oxygen on electrodes partially immersed in phosphoric acid,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 581–585, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. D. Fritts, D. Gervasio, R. L. Zeller, and R. F. Savinell, “Investigation of H2 gas transport in recast Nafion films coated on platinum in hydrogen saturated 85% phosphoric acid,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, no. 11, pp. 3345–3349, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. A. Gewirth and M. S. Thorum, “Electroreduction of dioxygen for fuel-cell applications: materials and challenges,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 3557–3566, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. H. B. Lima, J. Zhang, M. H. Shao et al., “Catalytic activity-d-Band center correlation for the O2 reduction reaction on platinum in alkaline solutions,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 404–410, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. M. Trunov, “On the mechanism of oxygen reduction on single-crystal and polycrystalline Pt electrodes in alkaline media,” Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 332–338, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Devivaraprasad, R. Ramesh, N. Naresh, T. Kar, R. Kumar Singh, and M. Neergat, “Oxygen reduction reaction and peroxide generation on shape-controlled and polycrystalline platinum nanoparticles in acidic and alkaline electrolytes,” Langmuir, vol. 30, no. 29, pp. 8995–9006, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. Jin, H. Du, S. Zheng, H. Xu, and Y. Zhang, “Comparison of the oxygen reduction reaction between NaOH and KOH solutions on a Pt electrode: the electrolyte-dependent effect,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 114, no. 19, pp. 6542–6548, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Tammeveski, T. Tenno, J. Claret, and C. Ferrater, “Electrochemical reduction of oxygen on thin-film Pt electrodes in 0.1 M KOH,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 893–897, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Tammeveski, M. Arulepp, T. Tenno, C. Ferrater, and J. Claret, “Oxygen electroreduction on titanium-supported thin Pt films in alkaline solution,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 42, no. 19, pp. 2961–2967, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Couturier, D. W. Kirk, P. J. Hyde, and S. Srinivasan, “Electrocatalysis of the hydrogen oxidation and of the oxygen reduction reactions of Pt and some alloys in alkaline medium,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 995–1005, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S.-M. Park, S. Ho, S. Aruliah et al., “Electrochemical reduction of oxygen at platinum electrodes in KOH solutions—temperature and concentration effects,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 133, no. 8, pp. 1641–1649, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. F. Zinola, A. M. C. Luna, W. E. Triaca, and A. J. Arvia, “Kinetics and mechanism of the electrochemical reduction of molecular oxygen on platinum in KOH: influence of preferred crystallographic orientation,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 531–541, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. S. Ryabova, F. S. Napolskiy, T. Poux et al., “Rationalizing the influence of the Mn(IV)/Mn(III) red-ox transition on the electrocatalytic activity of manganese oxides in the oxygen reduction reaction,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 187, pp. 161–172, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Srinivasan, “Fuel cells for extraterrestrial and terrestrial applications,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 41C–48C, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  16. C. Chakkaravarthy, A. K. A. Waheed, and H. V. K. Udupa, “Zinc—air alkaline batteries—a review,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 203–228, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Geniès, R. Faure, and R. Durand, “Electrochemical reduction of oxygen on platinum nanoparticles in alkaline media,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 44, no. 8-9, pp. 1317–1327, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. X. Ge, A. Sumboja, D. Wuu et al., “Oxygen reduction in alkaline media: from mechanisms to recent advances of catalysts,” ACS Catalysis, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 4643–4667, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y.-F. Yang, Y.-H. Zhou, and C.-S. Cha, “Electrochemical reduction of oxygen on small palladium particles supported on carbon in alkaline solution,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 40, no. 16, pp. 2579–2586, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Prakash and H. Joachin, “Electrocatalytic activity of ruthenium for oxygen reduction in alkaline solution,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 2289–2296, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. L. Gojković, S. Gupta, and R. F. Savinell, “Heat-treated iron(III) tetramethoxyphenyl porphyrin chloride supported on high-area carbon as an electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction: part II. Kinetics of oxygen reduction,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 462, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. L. Gojković, S. Gupta, and R. F. Savinell, “Heat-treated iron(III) tetramethoxyphenyl porphyrin chloride supported on high-area carbon as an electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction: part III. Detection of hydrogen-peroxide during oxygen reduction,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 889–897, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. Heller-Ling, M. Prestat, J.-L. Gautier, J.-F. Koenig, G. Poillerat, and P. Chartier, “Oxygen electroreduction mechanism at thin NixCo3−xO4 spinel films in a double channel electrode flow cell (DCEFC),” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Hu, Y. V. Tolmachev, and D. A. Scherson, “Rotating ring-disk studies of oxidized nickel hydrous oxide: oxygen evolution and pseudocapacitance,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 468, no. 1, pp. 64–69, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. V. Rashkova, S. Kitova, I. Konstantinov, and T. Vitanov, “Vacuum evaporated thin films of mixed cobalt and nickel oxides as electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution and reduction,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1555–1560, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Ponce, J.-L. Rehspringer, G. Poillerat, and J. L. Gautier, “Electrochemical study of nickel-aluminium-manganese spinel NixAl1−xMn2O4. Electrocatalytical properties for the oxygen evolution reaction and oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 46, no. 22, pp. 3373–3380, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Poux, F. S. Napolskiy, T. Dintzer et al., “Dual role of carbon in the catalytic layers of perovskite/carbon composites for the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction,” Catalysis Today, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. Poux, A. Bonnefont, G. Kéranguéven, G. A. Tsirlina, and E. R. Savinova, “Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction on perovskite oxides: series versus direct pathway,” ChemPhysChem, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2108–2120, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. X. Cui, Z. Hua, L. Chen, X. Zhang, H. Chen, and J. Shi, “Manganese oxide nanorod-decorated mesoporous ZSM-5 composite as a precious-metal-free electrode catalyst for oxygen reduction,” ChemSusChem, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1010–1019, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Mao, D. Zhang, T. Sotomura, K. Nakatsu, N. Koshiba, and T. Ohsaka, “Mechanistic study of the reduction of oxygen in air electrode with manganese oxides as electrocatalysts,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1015–1021, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. B. Klápště, J. Vondrák, and J. Velická, “MnOx/C composites as electrode materials II. Reduction of oxygen on bifunctional catalysts based on manganese oxides,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 2365–2369, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Flegler, S. Hartmann, H. Weinrich et al., “Manganese oxide coated carbon materials as hybrid catalysts for the application in primary aqueous metal-air batteries,” Journal of Carbon Research C, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 4–17, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Gorlin and T. F. Jaramillo, “A bifunctional nonprecious metal catalyst for oxygen reduction and water oxidation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 39, pp. 13612–13614, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. L. Pickrahn, S. W. Park, Y. Gorlin, H.-B. Lee, T. F. Jaramillo, and S. F. Bent, “Active MnOx electrocatalysts prepared by atomic layer deposition for oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1269–1277, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. T. Ohsaka, L. Mao, K. Arihara, and T. Sotomura, “Bifunctional catalytic activity of manganese oxide toward O2 reduction: novel insight into the mechanism of alkaline air electrode,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 273–277, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Jiao and H. Frei, “Nanostructured manganese oxide clusters supported on mesoporous silica as efficient oxygen-evolving catalysts,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 17, pp. 2920–2922, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P.-C. Li, C.-C. Hu, H. Noda, and H. Habazaki, “Synthesis and characterization of carbon black/manganese oxide air cathodes for zinc–air batteries: effects of the crystalline structure of manganese oxides,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 298, pp. 102–113, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Cheng and J. Chen, “Metal-air batteries: from oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2172–2192, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Electric Fuel Air Electrodes,
  40. H. Nguyen Cong, K. El Abbassi, J. L. Gautier, and P. Chartier, “Oxygen reduction on oxide/polypyrrole composite electrodes: effect of doping anions,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1369–1376, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Deronzier and J.-C. Moutet, “Polypyrrole films containing metal complexes: syntheses and applications,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 147, pp. 339–371, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. Simon, E. Sablé, H. Handel, and M. L'Her, “Electrodes modified by conducting polymers bearing redox sites: Ni- and Co-cyclam complexes on polypyrrole,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 855–863, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. H. An, K. K. Jeon, J. K. Heo, S. C. Lim, D. J. Bae, and Y. H. Lee, “High-capacitance supercapacitor using a nanocomposite electrode of single-walled carbon nanotube and polypyrrole,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 149, no. 8, pp. A1058–A1068, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Sadki, P. Schottland, N. Brodie, and G. Sabouraud, “The mechanisms of pyrrole electropolymerization,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 283–293, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Rapecki, M. Donten, and Z. Stojek, “Electrodeposition of polypyrrole-Au nanoparticles composite from one solution containing gold salt and monomer,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 624–627, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. Bocchetta, B. Alemán, M. Amati et al., “ORR stability of Mn-Co/polypyrrole nanocomposite electrocatalysts studied by quasi in-situ identical-location photoelectron microspectroscopy,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 69, pp. 50–54, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Masa, T. Schilling, M. Bron, and W. Schuhmann, “Electrochemical synthesis of metal–polypyrrole composites and their activation for electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen by thermal treatment,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 60, pp. 410–418, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. P. Bocchetta, A. Gianoncelli, M. K. Abyaneh et al., “Electrosynthesis of Co/PPy nanocomposites for ORR electrocatalysis: a study based on quasi-in situ X-ray absorption, fluorescence and in situ Raman spectroscopy,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 137, pp. 535–545, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Bocchetta, M. Amati, L. Gregoratti et al., “Morphochemical evolution during ageing of pyrolysed Mn/polypyrrole nanocomposite oxygen reduction electrocatalysts: a study based on quasi-in situ photoelectron spectromicroscopy,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 758, pp. 191–200, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. B. Bozzini, A. Gianoncelli, P. Bocchetta, S. Dal Zilio, and G. Kourousias, “Fabrication of a sealed electrochemical microcell for in situ soft X-ray microspectroscopy and testing with in situ co-polypyrrole composite electrodeposition for Pt-free oxygen electrocatalysis,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 664–670, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. B. Bozzini, P. Bocchetta, B. Alemán et al., “Electrodeposition and pyrolysis of Mn/polypyrrole nanocomposites: a study based on soft X-ray absorption, fluorescence and photoelectron microspectroscopies,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 3, no. 37, pp. 19155–19167, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. B. Bozzini, P. Bocchetta, A. Gianoncelli, C. Mele, and M. Kiskinova, “Electrodeposition and ageing of Mn-based binary composite oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts,” ChemElectroChem, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1541–1550, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Y. U. Pleskov and V. Y. Filinovski, The Rotating Disc Electrode, Consultants Bureau, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
  54. A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, 1980.
  55. R. E. Davis, G. L. Horvath, and C. W. Tobias, “The solubility and diffusion coefficient of oxygen in potassium hydroxide solutions,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 287–297, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. Y. Li, W. Zhou, H. Wang et al., “An oxygen reduction electrocatalyst based on carbon nanotube-graphene complexes,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 394–400, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. B. Anderson and R. A. Sidik, “Oxygen electroreduction on FeII and FeIII coordinated to N4 chelates. Reversible potentials for the intermediate steps from quantum theory,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 16, pp. 5031–5035, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. Médard, M. Lefèvre, J. P. Dodelet, F. Jaouen, and G. Lindbergh, “Oxygen reduction by Fe-based catalysts in PEM fuel cell conditions: activity and selectivity of the catalysts obtained with two Fe precursors and various carbon supports,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 16, pp. 3202–3213, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. I. Popov, S. S. Djokic, and B. N. Grgur, Fundamental Aspects of Electrometallurgy, chapter 5, Kluwer, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  60. H. J. Lee and S.-M. Park, “Electrochemistry of conductive polymers. 30. Nanoscale measurements of doping distributions and current-voltage characteristics of electrochemically deposited polypyrrole films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1590–1595, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. R. M. Penner, L. S. Van Dyke, and C. R. Martin, “Electrochemical evaluation of charge-transport rates in polypyrrole,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 92, no. 18, pp. 5274–5282, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. F. Diaz, J. I. Castillo, J. A. Logan, and W.-Y. Lee, “Electrochemistry of conducting polypyrrole films,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 115–132, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. F. A. Harraz, “Electrochemical polymerization of pyrrole into nanostructured p-type porous silicon,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 153, no. 5, pp. C349–C356, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. R. R. L. De Oliveira, D. A. C. Albuquerque, T. G. S. Cruz, F. M. Yamaji, and F. L. Leite, Atomic Force Microscopy—Imaging, Measuring and Manipulating Surfaces at the Atomic Scale, Measurement of the Nanoscale Roughness by Atomic Force Microscopy: Basic Principles and Applications, Edited by V. Bellitto, InTech, 2012.
  65. J. Duchet, R. Legras, and S. Demoustier-Champagne, “Chemical synthesis of polypyrrole: structure-properties relationship,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. B. Gonçalves, A. S. Mangrich, and A. J. G. Zarbin, “Polymerization of pyrrole between the layers of α-Tin(IV) Bis(hydrogenphosphate),” Synthetic Metals, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 119–124, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. C. J. Zhong, Z. Q. Tian, and Z. W. Tian, “In situ ESR and Raman spectroscopic studies of the electrochemical process of conducting polypyrrole films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 2171–2175, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. M. Julien, M. Massot, and C. Poinsignon, “Lattice vibrations of manganese oxides: part I. Periodic structures,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 689–700, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Q. Feng, H. Kanoh, and K. Ooi, “Manganese oxide porous crystals,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 319–333, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. T. Gao, M. Glerup, F. Krumeich, R. Nesper, H. Fjellvåg, and P. Norby, “Microstructures and spectroscopic properties of cryptomelane-type manganese dioxide nanofibers,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 34, pp. 13134–13140, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. T. Gao, H. Fjellvág, and P. Norby, “Structural and morphological evolution of β-MnO2 nanorods during hydrothermal synthesis,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 055610–055616, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Jiang and A. Kucernak, “Electrochemical supercapacitor material based on manganese oxide: preparation and characterization,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 2381–2386, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. Sun, B. Lan, L. Yu et al., “Manganese oxides with different crystalline structures: facile hydrothermal synthesis and catalytic activities,” Materials Letters, vol. 86, pp. 18–20, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. B. Liu, X. Hu, H. Xu, W. Luo, Y. Sun, and Y. Huang, “Encapsulation of MnO nanocrystals in electrospun carbon nanofibers as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, article 4229, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. R. Baddour-Hadjean and J.-P. Pereira-Ramos, “Raman microspectrometry applied to the study of electrode materials for lithium batteries,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 1278–1319, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. T. Gao, H. Fjellvåg, and P. Norby, “A comparison study on Raman scattering properties of α- and β-MnO2,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 648, no. 2, pp. 235–239, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. Song and J. Zhang, “Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction,” in PEM Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts and Catalyst Layers: Fundamentals and Applications, pp. 89–134, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Z.-W. Liu, F. Peng, H.-J. Wang, H. Yu, W.-X. Zheng, and J. Yang, “Phosphorus-doped graphite layers with high electrocatalytic activity for the O2 reduction in an alkaline medium,” Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, vol. 50, no. 14, pp. 3257–3261, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. D. Qu, “Investigation of oxygen reduction on activated carbon electrodes in alkaline solution,” Carbon, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1296–1301, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. Maruyama, K.-I. Sumino, M. Kawaguchi, and I. Abe, “Influence of activated carbon pore structure on oxygen reduction at catalyst layers supported on rotating disk electrodes,” Carbon, vol. 42, no. 15, pp. 3115–3121, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. J. Appleby and J. Marie, “Kinetics of oxygen reduction on carbon materials in alkaline solution,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. F.-P. Hu, X.-G. Zhang, F. Xiao, and J.-L. Zhang, “Oxygen reduction on Ag-MnO2/SWNT and Ag-MnO2/AB electrodes,” Carbon, vol. 43, no. 14, pp. 2931–2936, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. G. Tamizhmani, J. P. Dodelet, D. Guay, G. Lalande, and G. A. Capuano, “Electrocatalytic activity of Nafion‐impregnated pyrolyzed cobalt phthalocyanine: a correlative study between rotating disk and solid polymer electrolyte fuel‐cell electrodes,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. G. Lalande, G. Faubert, R. Côté et al., “Catalytic activity and stability of heat-treated iron phthalocyanines for the electroreduction of oxygen in polymer electrolyte fuel cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 227–237, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. R. Bresciani, S. Marzorati, A. Lascialfari, B. Sacchi, N. Santo, and M. Longhi, “Effects of catalyst aging on the growth morphology and oxygen reduction activity of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 51, pp. 27–32, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. R. Jiang and F. C. Anson, “The origin of inclined plateau currents in steady-state voltammograms for electrode processes involving electrocatalysis,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, vol. 305, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. R. A. Bull, F. R. Fan, and A. J. Bard, “Polymer films on electrodes. 13. Incorporation of catalysts into electronically conductive polymers: iron phthalocyanine in polypyrrole,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 687–689, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S. Jiang, C. Zhu, and S. Dong, “Cobalt and nitrogen-cofunctionalized graphene as a durable non-precious metal catalyst with enhanced ORR activity,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 3593–3599, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. X. Yuan, L. Li, Z. Ma et al., “Novel nanowire-structured polypyrrole-cobalt composite as efficient catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, article 20005, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. S. Chao, Z. Lu, Z. Bai et al., “Tuning synthesis of highly active nitrogen-doped graphite and determining the optimal structure from first-principles calculations,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 8786–8799, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  91. M. L. Calegaro, F. H. B. Lima, and E. A. Ticianelli, “Oxygen reduction reaction on nanosized manganese oxide particles dispersed on carbon in alkaline solutions,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 735–739, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Patrizia Bocchetta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.