Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Volume 2018, Article ID 1720375, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1720375
Research Article

A Standardized Approach to Quantitative Analysis of Nicotine in e-Liquids Based on Peak Purity Criteria Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

1Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
2Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Matthew S. Halquist; ude.ucv@smtsiuqlah

Received 2 May 2018; Accepted 8 July 2018; Published 9 August 2018

Academic Editor: Josep Esteve-Romero

Copyright © 2018 Vinit V. Gholap et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. H. Zhu, J. Y Sun, E. Bonnevie et al., “Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation,” Tobacco Control, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. iii3–iii9, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. K. Noel, V. W. Rees, and G. N. Connolly, “Electronic cigarettes: a new “tobacco” industry?” Tobacco Control, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 81, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Bhatnagar, L. P. Whitsel, K. M. Ribisl et al., “Electronic cigarettes: a policy statement from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 130, no. 16, pp. 1418–1436, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Blanding, The E-Cig Quandary|Harvard Public Health Magazine|Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 2016, https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/magazine/magazine_article/the-e-cig-quandary/.
  5. Food And Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry Listing of Ingredients in Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2017.
  6. P. Callahan-Lyon, “Electronic cigarettes: human health effects,” Tobacco Control, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. ii36–ii40, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Manzoli, C. La Vecchia, M. E. Flacco et al., “Multicentric cohort study on the long-term efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes: study design and methodology,” BMC Public Health, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 883, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. B. Drummond and D. Upson, “Electronic cigarettes: potential harms and benefits,” Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 236–242, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. A. Kaisar, S. Prasad, T. Liles, and L. Cucullo, “A decade of e-cigarettes: limited research & unresolved safety concerns,” Toxicology, vol. 365, pp. 67–75, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.
  11. B. Davis, M. Dang, J. Kim, and P. Talbot, “Nicotine concentrations in electronic cigarette refill and do-it-yourself fluids,” Nicotine & Tobacco Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 134–141, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. L. Trehy, W. Ye, M. E. Hadwiger et al., “Analysis of electronic cigarette cartridges, refill solutions, and smoke for nicotine and nicotine related impurities,” Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 1442–1458, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. W. Flora, C. T. Wilkinson, K. M. Sink, D. L. McKinney, and J. H. Miller, “Nicotine-related impurities in e-cigarette cartridges and refill e-liquids,” Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, vol. 39, no. 17-18, pp. 821–829, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Liu, P. Joza, and B. Rickert, “Analysis of nicotine and nicotine-related compounds in electronic cigarette liquids and aerosols by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International/Contributions to Tobacco Research, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 154–167, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Aszyk, P. Kubica, A. Kot-Wasik, J. Namieśnik, and A. Wasik, “Comprehensive determination of flavouring additives and nicotine in e-cigarette refill solutions. Part I: liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1519, pp. 45–54, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. J. S. Herrington, C. Myers, and A. Rigdon, Analysis of Nicotine and Impurities in Electronic Cigarette Solutions and Vapor, Restek, State College, PA, USA, 2015.
  17. J. F. Etter, E. Zäther, and S. Svensson, “Analysis of refill liquids for electronic cigarettes,” Addiction, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 1671–1679, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. K. Meruva, M. E. Benvenuti, G. E. Cleland, and J. A. Burgess, Simultaneous Determination of Nicotine and Related Impurities in E-Liquids and E-Cigarettes Using UPLC-UV-MS, Waters, UK, 2016.
  19. Waters Corporation, Waters 996 Photodiode Detector: Peak Purity I What is Peak Purity Analysis? Peak Purity Analysis, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA, 1998.
  20. International Conference on Harmonization, ICH Topic Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Waters, UK, 2005.
  21. A. Bose, “HPLC calibration process parameters in terms of system suitability test,” Austin Chromatography, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  22. The United States Pharmacopeia, “General chapter, <621> chromatography,” in USP40-NF35, pp. 424–434, USP, Rockville, MD, USA, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  23. The United States Pharmacopeia, “1225 validation of compendial procedures,” in USP34-NF29, pp. 778–782, USP, Rockville, MD, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  24. K. M. Alsante, A. Ando, R. Brown et al., “The role of degradant profiling in active pharmaceutical ingredients and drug products,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. K. Sharma and M. Murugesan, “Forced degradation study an essential approach to develop stability indicating method,” Journal of Chromatography and Separation Techniques, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 8–10, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar