Research Article
A Standardized Approach to Quantitative Analysis of Nicotine in e-Liquids Based on Peak Purity Criteria Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
Table 6
Results of forced degradation of various e-liquid flavors.
| Name of sample | Category | Stressed condition | % control assay | % acid degradation | % base degradation | % oxidation degradation |
| Standard | NA | NA | 7.75 | 8.29 | 7.62 | QC | NA | 99.39 | ND | ND | 3.5 | e-Liquid flavor P | Sweet | 95.98 | ND | ND | 12.2 | e-Liquid flavor Q | Menthol | 100.76 | 1.53 | ND | 4.14 | e-Liquid flavor R | Tobacco | 103.09 | 4.69 | 5.68 | 7.53 | e-Liquid flavor S | Menthol | 100.14 | 2.04 | 3.38 | 10.28 | e-Liquid flavor T | Fruit | 96.18 | 1.03 | ND | 2.06 | e-Liquid flavor U | Coffee | 97.68 | ND | 1.59 | 4.33 | e-Liquid flavor A | Tobacco | 96.19 | 1.94 | 1.00 | 4.75 | e-Liquid flavor C | Vanilla | 97.31 | 1.38 | 0.69 | 4.44 | e-Liquid flavor E | Fruit | 98.13 | ND | 1.44 | 14.13 | e-Liquid flavor G | Fruit | 96.94 | 6.38 | 1.00 | 2.5 |
|
|
Note. % degradation of ±1% is considered as no degradation (ND).
|