Research Article
Further Validation of a Rapid Screening Semiquantitative Thin-Layer Chromatographic Method for Marketed Antimalarial Medicines for Adoption in Malawi
Table 5
An estimated comparison of the cost drivers for HPLC and SQ-TLC analyses.
| Cost factor | HPLC ($) | SQ-TLC ($) |
| Acquisition | ≈100,000.00 | Scanner/phone: 50.00 | Stationery phase cost | ≈490/100 injections = 4.9/sample. 4.9 × 6 = 29.4 per sample for 6 replicates | 77/25 plates = 3.08/sample for 6 replicates | Solvent’s cost | High (HPLC grade; highest purity) | Low (any grade) | Degassing | 0.08/sample | Nil | Sample cleanup cost | 0.78–15.51/sample | Nil | Annual maintenance | ≈465–1485 | Nil | Standby equipment and service technician | Yes | No | Precolumn | ≈10–50 | Nil | Validation | Needed frequently | Rarely needed | Wear and tear | High (due to high pressure) | Nil | Speed of analysis | Low | High | Cost per sample analysis | ≈0.47–1.17 | 0.12–0.16 | Parallel analysis | No, 1 at a time | Yes | Time per sample | 2–60 minutes | 5–10 minutes | Analyst skills needed | High to very high | Low to high | Analysis | Machine | Machine + eyes + software |
|
|