Research Article
Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticle Potentiometric Detection Strategy versus Classical Potentiometric Strategy for Determination of Chlorpheniramine Maleate and Pseudoephedrine HCl
Table 7
Statistical comparison between the results obtained by the proposed sensors and the reported method for the determination of CPM and PSE in pure form.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
aAverage of six determinations; bfigures between parentheses represent the corresponding tabulated values of t and F at ; creported HPLC method using C18 column, flow rate 1.5 mL·min−1, mobile phase is a gradient elution of acetonitrile:phosphate buffer (15 : 85, v/v) for 5.5 min, (45 : 55, v/v) for 5.5–12 min, and (60 : 40, v/v) for 12–17 min at pH = 3 and UV detection at 220 nm. |