Research Article

Simultaneous Quantification of 14 Compounds in Achillea millefolium by GC-MS Analysis and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Multivariate Techniques

Table 2

Comparison of the optimized parameters for developing the NIR single-compound regression models (SCM) and the multiple compound regression model (MCM).

Sample preparation1ModelCompoundn2Wavenumber (cm−1)Data pretreatmentMethodFactors

SairSCMC152/264008–9996MSCPLS5
C252/264008–9996MSCPLS6
C352/264008–9996MSCPLS7
C452/264596–9996MSCPLS6
C552/264008–9996MSCPLS7
C652/264008–9996MSCPLS11
C752/264008–9996Smoothing (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points)PLS8
C852/264596–9996MSCPLS6
C952/264440–9000First derivative (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points); normalization to unit lengthPLS11
C1052/264440–9000First derivative (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points); normalization to unit lengthPLS5
C1152/264440–9000First derivative (BCAP); normalization by closurePLS11
C1252/264008–9996MSCPLS6
C1352/264008–9996MSCPLS6
C1452/264596–9996Log (1/R); normalization by closure; second derivative (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points)PLS12

SairMCMC1–1452/264008–9996MSCPLS8
SovenC1–1424/124596–9996First derivative (BCAP); normalization by closurePLS5
Sair-and-ovenC1–1476/384008–9996Normalization by closurePCR12

1Sair = air-dried A. millefolium; Soven = oven-dried A. millefolium; Sair-and-oven = mixture of air-dried and oven-dried A. millefolium, 2sample number in the calibration set/sample numbers in the validation set.