Simultaneous Quantification of 14 Compounds in Achillea millefolium by GC-MS Analysis and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Multivariate Techniques
Table 2
Comparison of the optimized parameters for developing the NIR single-compound regression models (SCM) and the multiple compound regression model (MCM).
Sample preparation1
Model
Compound
n2
Wavenumber (cm−1)
Data pretreatment
Method
Factors
Sair
SCM
C1
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
5
C2
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
6
C3
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
7
C4
52/26
4596–9996
MSC
PLS
6
C5
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
7
C6
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
11
C7
52/26
4008–9996
Smoothing (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points)
PLS
8
C8
52/26
4596–9996
MSC
PLS
6
C9
52/26
4440–9000
First derivative (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points); normalization to unit length
PLS
11
C10
52/26
4440–9000
First derivative (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points); normalization to unit length
PLS
5
C11
52/26
4440–9000
First derivative (BCAP); normalization by closure
PLS
11
C12
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
6
C13
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
6
C14
52/26
4596–9996
Log (1/R); normalization by closure; second derivative (Savitzky–Golay, 9 points)
PLS
12
Sair
MCM
C1–14
52/26
4008–9996
MSC
PLS
8
Soven
C1–14
24/12
4596–9996
First derivative (BCAP); normalization by closure
PLS
5
Sair-and-oven
C1–14
76/38
4008–9996
Normalization by closure
PCR
12
1Sair = air-dried A. millefolium; Soven = oven-dried A. millefolium; Sair-and-oven = mixture of air-dried and oven-dried A. millefolium, 2sample number in the calibration set/sample numbers in the validation set.