Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Aging Research
Volume 2015, Article ID 185054, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/185054
Research Article

Exploring Innovative Solutions for Quality of Life and Care of Bed-Ridden Nursing Home Residents through Codesign Sessions

1Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Fontys EGT-Centre for Healthcare and Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, Netherlands
2Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Allied Health Professions, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, Netherlands
3Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
4Fontys School of People and Health Studies, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, Netherlands
5Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Rachelsmolen 1, 5612 MA Eindhoven, Netherlands
6Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Human Resource Management and Psychology, Emmasingel 28, 5611 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
7Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Engineering, Rachelsmolen 1, 5612 MA Eindhoven, Netherlands

Received 12 May 2015; Revised 24 August 2015; Accepted 1 September 2015

Academic Editor: F. R. Ferraro

Copyright © 2015 J. van Hoof et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. van Hoof, M. H. Wetzels, A. M. C. Dooremalen et al., “Technological and architectural solutions for Dutch nursing homes: results of a multidisciplinary mind mapping session with professional stakeholders,” Technology in Society, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. van Hoof and E. J. M. Wouters, Het Verpleeghuis van de Toekomst is (een) Thuis, Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten, The Netherlands:, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. de Klerk, Ouderen in instellingen. Landelijk overzicht van de leefsituatie van oudere tehuisbewoners, Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2005.
  4. M. Annemans, C. H. Van Audenhove, H. Vermolen, and A. Heylighen, “Being transported into the unknown: how patients experience the route to the operation room,” in Inclusive Designing: Joining Usability, Accessibility, and Inclusion, P. M. Langdon, J. Lazar, A. Heylighen, and H. Dong, Eds., pp. 131–141, Springer, London, UK, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. van der Geest and G. Mommersteeg, “Beds and culture: introduction,” Medische Antropologie, vol. 18, pp. 7–17, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. van Hoof, M. M. Verhagen, E. J. Wouters, H. R. Marston, M. D. Rijnaard, and B. M. Janssen, “Picture your nursing home: exploring the sense of home of older residents through photography,” Journal of Aging Research, vol. 2015, Article ID 312931, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. N. Strating, R. van Herpen, and W. Zeiler, “Evacuatie van bedgebonden patiënten,” TVVL Magazine, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 46–48, 2015 (Dutch). View at Google Scholar
  8. J. van Hoof and M. J. Verkerk, “Developing an integrated design model incorporating technology philosophy for the design of healthcare environments: a case analysis of facilities for psychogeriatric and psychiatric care in The Netherlands,” Technology in Society, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. van Hoof, P. G. S. Rutten, C. Struck, E. R. C. M. Huisman, and H. S. M. Kort, “The integrated and evidence-based design of healthcare environments,” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, vol. 11, pp. 243–263, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Parker, S. Barnes, K. Mckee, K. Morgan, J. Torrington, and P. Tregenza, “Quality of life and building design in residential and nursing homes for older people,” Ageing and Society, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 941–962, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Xu, R. L. Kane, and T. A. Shamliyan, “Effect of nursing home characteristics on residents' quality of life: a systematic review,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 127–142, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Delhoofen, “Creativiteit en innovatie,” in Handboek Ontwerpen. Innovatie, Communicatie en Analyse bij het Ontwerpen van Producten, chapter 11, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2nd edition, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. Argyris and D. A. Schön, “Participatory action research and action science compared: a commentary,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 612–623, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Bilandzic and J. Venable, “Towards participatory action design research: adapting action research and design science research methods for urban informatics,” The Journal of Community Informatics, vol. 7, no. 3, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Madden, Y. Cadet-James, I. Atkinson, and F. Watkin Lui, “Probes and prototypes: a participatory action research approach to codesign,” CoDesign, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Lahtinen, S. Nenonen, H. Rasila, J. Lehtelä, V. Ruohomäki, and K. Reijula, “Rehabilitation centers in change: participatory methods for managing redesign and renovation,” Health Environments Research & Design Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 57–75, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Howard and M. M. Somerville, “A comparative study of two design charrettes: implications for codesign and participatory action research,” CoDesign, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 46–62, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Malagon-Maldonado, “Qualitative research in health design,” Health Environments Research & Design Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 120–134, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. B.-N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, “Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning,” CoDesign, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Laurel, “Design improvisation. Etnography meets theatre,” in Design Research: Methods and Perspectives, B. Laurel, Ed., pp. 49–54, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  21. G. Triantafyllakos, G. Palaigeorgiou, and I. A. Tsoukalas, “Fictional characters in participatory design sessions: introducing the ‘design alter egos’ technique,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 165–175, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Bate and G. Robert, Bringing User Experience to Healthcare Improvement. The Concepts, Methods and Practices of Experience-Based Design, Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford, UK, 2007.
  23. E. B.-N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design,” CoDesign, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. T. Miaskiewicz and K. A. Kozar, “Personas and user-centered design: how can personas benefit product design processes?” Design Studies, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 417–430, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Ferreira, N. Almeida, A. F. Rosa et al., “Elderly centered design for interaction—the case of the S4S medication assistant,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 27, pp. 398–408, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Turner and S. Turner, “Is stereotyping inevitable when designing with personas?” Design Studies, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 30–44, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. Krippendorff, “Content analysis,” in International Encyclopedia of Communication, E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, and L. Gross, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 403–407, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  29. B. E. Carey-Smith, N. M. Evans, and R. D. Orpwood, “A user-centred design process to develop technology to improve sleep quality in residential care homes,” Technology and Disability, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Martin, J. C. Augusto, P. McCullagh et al., “Participatory research to design a novel telehealth system to support the night-time needs of people with dementia: NOCTURNAL,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 6764–6782, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Shortall, “Participatory action research,” in The A–Z of Social Research, R. L. Miller and J. D. Brewer, Eds., pp. 225–227, Sage Publications, London, UK, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. van Hoof, R. A. Overdiep, C. M. M. Cox, M. L. L. Weymans, and L. J. Peeraer, “Health care and technology: a new approach to education and applied research,” in Everyday Technology for Independence and Care, G. J. Gelderblom, M. Soede, L. Adriaens, and K. Miesenberger, Eds., pp. 222–224, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. van Hoof, E. L. M. Zwerts-Verhelst, M. E. Nieboer, and E. J. M. Wouters, “Innovations in multidisciplinary education in healthcare and technology,” Perspectives on Medical Education, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 146–148, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. J. van Hoof, P. G. S. Rutten, C. Struck, E. R. C. M. Huisman, and H. S. M. Kort, “The integrated and evidence-based design of healthcare environments,” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 243–263, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Marquardt and T. Motzek, “How to rate the quality of a research paper: introducing a helpful algorithm for architects and designers,” Health Environments Research & Design Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 119–127, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus