Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Aging Research
Volume 2016, Article ID 8569602, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8569602
Research Article

Robotic Seals as Therapeutic Tools in an Aged Care Facility: A Qualitative Study

1Nursing, Midwifery, and Nutrition, Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
2Nursing, Midwifery, and Nutrition, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
3Clinical Psychology, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore Campus, Singapore
4Aged Care Services Australia Group, Launceston, TAS, Australia
5Regis Aged Care, Townsville, QLD, Australia

Received 27 August 2016; Accepted 25 October 2016

Academic Editor: F. R. Ferraro

Copyright © 2016 Melanie Birks et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [16 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Eva Wiese, Giorgio Metta, and Agnieszka Wykowska, “Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Dominika Chiberska, “The use of robotic animals in dementia care: challenges and ethical dilemmas,” Mental Health Practice, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Irena Papadopoulos, Christina Koulouglioti, and Sheila Ali, “Views of nurses and other health and social care workers on the use of assistive humanoid and animal-like robots in health and social care: a scoping review,” Contemporary Nurse, pp. 1–18, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Irena Papadopoulos, and Christina Koulouglioti, “The Influence of Culture on Attitudes Towards Humanoid and Animal-like Robots: An Integrative Review,” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Damith C. Herath, Evgenios Vlachos, and Elizabeth Jochum, “An Experimental Study of Embodied Interaction and Human Perception of Social Presence for Interactive Robots in Public Settings,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1096–1105, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jin Hwan Oh, “Prospects of Geriatric Nursing Application Based on Robot Technology,” Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing, vol. 20, no. Suppl1, pp. 127–136, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Natalya A. Aleksandrova, Marina V. Khramova, and Alexander E. Hramov, “Designing, Implementation and Use of Robotic Devices in the Social Sectors in Foreign Studies,” Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference "Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies", IT and QM and IS 2018, pp. 536–541, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Heidrun Becker, “Robotik in der Gesundheitsversorgung: Hoffnungen, Befürchtungen und Akzeptanz aus Sicht der Nutzerinnen und Nutzer,” Pflegeroboter, pp. 229–248, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Michael Früh, and Alina Gasser, “Erfahrungen aus dem Einsatz von Pflegerobotern für Menschen im Alter,” Pflegeroboter, pp. 37–62, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Annette Riedel, “Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention für Menschen mit Demenz – ethische Implikationen und exemplarische Entscheidungskonflikte,” Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention für Menschen mit Demenz, pp. 55–73, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Amara Callistus Nwosu, Bethany Sturgeon, Tamsin McGlinchey, Christian DG Goodwin, Ardhendu Behera, Stephen Mason, Sarah Stanley, and Terry R Payne, “Robotic technology for palliative and supportive care: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats,” Palliative Medicine, pp. 026921631985762, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tobias Krick, Kai Huter, Dominik Domhoff, Annika Schmidt, Heinz Rothgang, and Karin Wolf-Ostermann, “Digital technology and nursing care: a scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 19, no. 1, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nathan Caruana, and Genevieve McArthur, “The mind minds minds: The effect of intentional stance on the neural encoding of joint attention,” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Rebecca Abbott, Noreen Orr, Paige McGill, Rebecca Whear, Alison Bethel, Ruth Garside, Ken Stein, and Jo Thompson‐Coon, “How do “robopets” impact the health and well‐being of residents in care homes? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence,” International Journal of Older People Nursing, pp. e12239, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Margaret Boone Rappaport, and Christopher Corbally, “Program Planning for a Mars Hardship Post: Social, Psychological, and Spiritual Services,” The Human Factor in a Mission to Mars, pp. 35–58, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • C. Melander, M. Olsson, S. Jayousi, A. Martinelli, and L. Mucchi, “Digital Resources Aiding Opportunities for Affiliation and Practical Reasoning Among People with Dementia: A Scoping Review,” Body Area Networks: Smart IoT and Big Data for Intelligent Health Management, vol. 297, pp. 301–314, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar